Courts Not Justified in Blocking Trump’s Immigration Order

robart






It appears likely that the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals will maintain a block on President Trump’s temporary immigration ban, but the decision will have less to do with the law than it does with politics. Because frankly, there’s no reason on earth that the judiciary should strike down this executive order.

First of all, there’s a major question as to whether Washington and Minnesota, the states that filed suit against the order, even have the proper standing to sue. This isn’t like Obama’s DAPA order, which was challenged successfully by the state of Texas and others. There, the states proved that Obama’s order would have an enormous financial impact on their states. They had every reason to oppose the administration.

Here, the question is much more murky. Judge James Robart determined that the states would face “irreparable injury” due to the 90-day pause, but that’s laughable.

But even if we look past that, this decision is not based on sound legal precedent. The courts have made it clear that the president of the United States has broad authority when it comes to deciding who gets into the country and who doesn’t. In many ways, the security of the nation is the ultimate responsibility of the chief executive, and it’s where he enjoys his greatest power. It’s not up to the courts to challenge this authority whenever they disagree with the steps the president has taken – especially when those steps are as mild as the ones Trump as taken so far.

For all the talk about the Constitution, there’s one thing the liberal media – and Judge Robart – fail to mention. And that’s the fact that people outside the United States do not have constitutional rights. PERIOD, as Mr. Spicer might say. The U.S. has always had the right to say who comes and who does not.

For eight years, Barack Obama steadily tried to steal power away from the other branches of government. Now, within the first weeks of Donald Trump’s presidency, the courts are trying to steal rightful power away from the White House.

If Trump had never mentioned a “Muslim ban” on the campaign trail, would Judge Robart have blocked this order? If not, then there’s everything you need to know about the grounding of this ruling. We need judges who will decide cases based on the text in evidence, and not on a candidate’s campaign-trail bluster.


  • randi amundsen

    They is all in SOROS and OBama’s pocket. We really have to drain the swamp inDC do not trust any of them

    • are_we_nuts

      This is why we MUST have the Obamaville Trials and put those traitors criminals where they belong, that is, life term jail without parole.

      • MEC

        After a fair trial, if found guilty a 9 cent bullet is much cheaper.

        • Mathew Molk

          Where you buying your bang? – I’ll take all the .38 S&W and .357 you can get me at that price.

          • MEC

            Not the gun. Just the bullet. Placed correctly the housing issue is solved.

      • Gary

        The penalty for Treason sir, is “death”, not life in prison. Death by firing squad, or hanging! I am partial to hanging.

        • Just1Saddletramp

          To be truly effective the executions, either form, should be publicly televised

          • Dennis B Anderson

            I got to watch Saddam Hussein get his neck snapped and then they took it off the air. I think ts time to bring back the guillotine. How would you like to see Obama / Hillary / Eric the Hair Lipped Holders head pulled up out of the basket still trying to mouth his innocence. So much for fast and furious there buddy you dont want to go there!

          • Millie Karnop

            I tell you what, those rioting for money should have their necks snapped too.

          • Uzoozy

            Everything will stop when snap yr mundi is gone

          • Carolyn Burton

            If we chop off any heads we’re being like the terrorists

          • Sharon Bauerle

            You can wait until some Muzzie decides it’s time for you to die. If my interpretation is correct, God says Pray for deliverance, then act against the jihadists.

          • obamasucks

            I’ll pray, “Dear God, where IS that rotten POS?”

          • Millie Karnop

            It is the message it would send to others that are pulling the crap for money.

          • Fuzzface

            Finally someone with some common sense and the right comparison to speak against this type of lunacy.

          • GODBlessRealAmerica!
          • obamasucks

            Sue him? I’d rather shoot him!

          • GODBlessRealAmerica!
          • obamasucks

            Yet the libs cry their crocodile tears over the putrid scum!

          • obamasucks

            That is all they will understand. If you saw your buddy’s head chopped off (and on TV no less!) it might make you change your ways.

          • Dennis B Anderson

            Hey you warm and fuzzy people where in the hell do you live? These people did the crime, and the only way you stop people like this is to finally take them serious. They have said they want to kill us what dont you get. Yeah talk nice to them Carolyn while youre being raped and brutalized. Its way past turning the other cheek. If you had been trapped in the towers before it went down and killed those innocent people! Your after thoughts would be different. It always happens to someone else until its to late. Standing up for myself and my country does not make me a racist you whack job. I cant wait till they take your food stamps, and housing away worry about that! HA-HA-HA

          • Carolyn Burton

            I live in TEXAS! I’m not the bleeding heart that thinks we should let these terrorists in. I’m all behind Trump on this and he’s getting stumped by bleeding heart judges. Send them all back and bomb the terrorists countries. I think that would be better, and more efficient, than acting like the evil people they are.
            Calling me a whack job based on my one sentence is overkill and I never accused you of being racist. Not wanting terrorist killlers in our country is Not racist. As far as food and housing, we have the biggest border to mexico. It’s real frustrating for Americans to have to jump through hoops to get anything we need and these ILLEGAL people get everything handed to them for free. Odumbo opened that border wide to let in his muslim brotherhood goons. Fortunately Trumps got things going for our southern borders, immigration department is busy busting them

          • Fuzzface

            You’re an idiot. If this punishment were used on you due to a false accusation which got you falsely sentenced to death you’d be crying like a baby.

          • GODBlessRealAmerica!
          • obamasucks

            Only till your head hit the basket!

          • Dennis B Anderson

            You also have a fuzz brain as well. Globally there are war crimes against Obama & Bush. Bush no longer leaves the United States. Obama & Hillary started their own private little war in Lybia. They sold weapons to both sides. Let people out of Gitmo and funded them? Have another hit in your troppers neck, and go back to your nod.
            Theres no intelegence here.

          • ABO

            We’re not discussing false accusations here. Where did you get that??? Just make things up as you go along?

          • obamasucks

            I will bring the popcorn!

          • Uzoozy

            Racist bigot

          • obamasucks

            I would contribute $100 to see that! I bet it would out-draw the Super Bowl.

        • panchoVilladeltren

          Nothing prettier than a ‘Muslim hanging around!’. Jake, git the rope.

        • Michael

          Bring back the hangings in the town square, that should get some of these idiots to really think about what they’re doing.

        • Michael Dennewitz

          I’ll supply the rope!! 😣

          • Borninbrooklyn

            I’ll supply my HANDS!

          • Millie Karnop

            And I will read from the Bible what God allows for the unrighteous and if Muslim, then the KOran

          • John

            Kansas has lots of pigs!! I know I can get that part of it!!

        • Craig Vandertie

          Those pansies will not allow the people decide who has committed the treason and should be charged, jailed, tried, and found guilty.

          The sad fact is we voted them in, but rarely do they ever do the bidding of the Common Good, which explains why they disapprove of every bill and EO the Potus has enacted so far.

          All the Demoncrats, RINOs, and tyrannical Federal court judges all agree to disagree with the POTUS, primarily because he wants to get rid of government of life long politicians, and bring a halt to Federal judges always siding with the Demoncommiecrats.

          • maggie in florida

            why did they NEVER protest obamas EO’s?

          • Never_a_Snowflake

            .
            Because the Rinos are just as guilty as the D’genrats. And when the swamp is drained BOTH D’genrats and Rinos go down the drain
            .

          • Mathew Molk

            Because they are NWO Marxists , just like him.

          • http://batman-news.com Jeffrey Cahoon

            Because he is black!

          • Craig Vandertie

            Because the Demoncommiecrats, and Federal judges, and RINOs owe everything to George Soros without his money they would not remained in power as long as they have.

          • Uzoozy

            Because the EO’s were fair and not bigoted.

          • GODBlessRealAmerica!
          • Carolyn Burton

            Because he’s one of them

          • Carolyn Burton

            Which is Exactly why we hired him, to drain the swamp

        • William Thompson

          How about real justice, turn them over to some of the families that have lost members of violence. Hanging or firing squad too easy and quick.

          • Gary

            William, if you turn them over to the families that have lost members to violence caused, or condoned by these people, you force the families to live with the actions that may or may not coincide with their morals or values. It may feed their anger, emotions, and revenge, but they would suffer far more than they already have. They should not be put in that position. Just Hang them where all can see what happens to people who commit Treason.

        • fishinjunki

          Death would be the easy way out. Make them suffer in prison for life, at HARD labor.

          • Gary

            Fishinjunki, the thought of them suffering hard labor in prison for life is a great fantasy. However, in the REAL WORLD prisoners in State penitentiarys have far more privileges then they deserve, and Federal Prisons are like country clubs, and they Would be in Federal prison. Besides, we have to pay for their existence in prison through taxes. I say Hang them.

          • pineapple

            While in prison, if they wanted a sex change, we would have to pay for that too!

          • Carolyn Burton

            If we wanted a facelift or boob job, better have some heavy pockets because they call that stuff Elective – reverse discrimination would be having to pay for a change

          • Millie Karnop

            And, they eat better than most of do; have medical, dental and vision

          • Millie Karnop

            Gitmo!

        • gerald Hughes

          Only if I get to pull the lever

        • Mathew Molk

          Firing squads are for brave and honorable men like enemy soldiers.

          Hanging is for traitors

        • tinker1

          yes it is true! How many would come in line if a few were hung in public for their treasonous act? That’s how it was handled when our government started! this continues because they have gotten by for years with no consequences.

          • Craig Vandertie

            I think death by guillotine would be the most appropriate means of execution, for every head that is separated from their shoulders the more dull the blade becomes and the more times the blade needs to be raised and dropped.

        • Millie Karnop

          Yeah, then we can stone them while they hang

        • http://batman-news.com Jeffrey Cahoon

          And televise it!!!

        • MARY MCCLURE

          I’d like to help.

        • Uzoozy

          Lets see what the present group of traitors will do, and get caught , will see when justice is done like you want.

      • country boy

        I say hang them and then shoot them, just too make sure…….

      • Millie Karnop

        I truly favor bread and water in GITMO!

      • GODBlessRealAmerica!
      • Alan Rhoads

        I sent this Open Letter directly to former AG Lynch; got no reply. I’ll now send it with revisions, to new AG Jeff Sessions.
        An Open Letter to Attorney General Loretta Lynch

        Dear Madam Attorney General:
        Just as Zika Virus has entered the Continental USA, so has corruption seeped into, what used to be, an above reproach Federal Agency, the Department of Justice. AG Lynch. You and FBI Dir. Comey, both Appointees of President Obama, have apparently become the President’s pawns to protect a guilty felon, Hillary Rodham Clinton. It’s time to take remedial action, admit that you are under President Obama’s thumb, and indict Ms. Clinton on all charges.

        Neither Dir. Comey, nor yourself, are willing to indict Ms. Clinton, and yet Dir. Comey admits to The House of Representatives that Ms. Clinton is guilty of theft, perjury, treason, and other felony charges. The Statutes do not rely on “intent” for authority to prosecute.

        You have chosen to allow corruption of the Rule of Law, by allowing Ms. Clinton to be above the Rule of Law; a two-tier system, if you will. Dir. Comey even stated that if anyone did the same crimes, they would be sent to prison (my paraphrasing). This is tantamount to Obstruction of Justice. You, Madam AG, did not recuse yourself so that you could remain in total control. Had you recused yourself, the Asst. Attorney General would be in control, and the outcome might have been different.

        Is it possible that “Pay to Play” is happening in your own House? I’m not speaking of a monetary exchange (although that’s still to be determined), but rather, a new career advancement. From my perspective, that appears plausible. If Ms. Clinton is not indicted, she remains a possible candidate for POTUS. If she becomes the POTUS, there is a distinct possibility that you, Loretta Lynch, would be appointed by Ms. Clinton, to a Seat on the Supreme Court. If Ms. Clinton is indicted, the Supreme Court offering goes away.

        Now. What about James Comey, your Subordinate? How does he benefit? For starters, he gets to keep his career, under Ms. Clinton’s POTUS watch if she’s elected. Beyond that benefit, your guess is as good as mine. But we do know that Dir. Comey is a Director of a large bank, HSBC Holdings, that has donated to the Clinton Foundation. Hmmmm. And then???? We learn that Bleachbit was used to wipe clean Hillary’s private servers. Isn’t that the “Intent” that you, for some reason, couldn’t find to indict her? You now need to indict her, or you and James B. Comey, are as corrupt as she is, and must resign or be impeached.

        PLEASE SHARE THIS OPEN LETTER FAR AND WIDE. I SENT IT DIRECTLY TO COMEY’S AND LYNCH’S OFFICES AT THE DOJ IN SEPTEMBER; NO RESPONSE; NONE EXPECTED.

        AG Loretta Lynch
        U.S. Department of Justice
        950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
        Washington, DC 20530-0001

        FBI Dir. James B. Comey
        FBI Headquarters
        935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
        Washington, D.C. 20535-0001

      • Uzoozy

        Racist bum

    • http://FREE-BUSINESSES.com/ FREE-STREAM-TV.com

      The swamp is actually a cesspool, far worse than anyone thought, so thank God it is all being exposed. WAKE UP AMERICA

      • Millie Karnop

        These rings, worldwide of pedophilia being spread faster than a fire storm is most concerning..HRC involved clear across the ponds..when will they clean their cess pools up..bet it will start if we imprison HRC and her minions

    • SouthernPatriot

      This will raise the number of cases that the 9th Circus has reversed. The plantiffs have no standing because they have not been injured. The court does not have jurisdiction to ask the questions it did, since it is a clear Constitutional issue.

    • Millie Karnop

      I agree and this judge, whatever it will take, needs to be dethroned..he is way off base..precedent has been set and should be kept as same..plus there are 4 laws that give the President the right to do this.

    • Uzoozy

      Hope when drawing the the pond, Donald Duck gets caught in the Rapids

    • Millie Karnop

      Exactly! Obama and Clinton set Precedence when they did the videos of their immigration policies and actually banning certain immigrants, mostly Christians for Obama, from this country; I would think that all Trump has to do is show the precedence of most of our past Presidents, from Hoover to Carter to I think Truman and Eisenhower – inclusive of the video that is now making the rounds on the internet.

  • Justin Seine

    I invite anyone who doubts the resolve of terrorists to what this short video clip of a soldier currently deployed in Iraq who has discussed this immigration order with the locals. I provides much food for thought.

    https://youtu.be/XglXSE3iOUg

    • Glenda Jordan

      Thought provoking and he’s spot on with the statement-he can’t walk ’round their country why should they be allowed to walk ’round his/ours!? Thanks for posting.

  • kate777

    Then when we have another Terrorists attack then it will be on the Judge(s) who made a wrong judgement as to President Trump’s constitutional right to ban any country immigrants who have posed a threat or could pose a threat, for who is to say all the people immigrating from that country are citizens of that country as well as do not have ISIS leanings. Vetting is a problem which it seems the Progressive, Lefts, Liberals wish to overlook. I can understand the immigrants situation, however the ban was not to be forever but for several months (90 days I believe) to give our government time to find some solution that would benefit all.
    Since 9/11/2001, the News Media have been like scavengers, hoping that the U.S. would have more terrorists attacks because then they would have something to speak of in their news casts. Before then, the News Media had limited their news to an hour or half hour (TV) and limited. Now it is all day long therefore they have to have something to report on, mischief makers they have become/ busybodies to the extent of making “fake” news. This is the way I see it.

    • contrary1

      First of all, you’re assuming that if a terrorist attack occurs, it will be from one of the countries upon which the travel ban was enforced. Lest you forget, the 9/11 attackers were from Saudi Arabia, one of the countries that was, for some reason about which I can hypothesize, but I wont, left off of the countries which were included in the ban. In addition, there are other countries which, if we’re so concerned about terrorism, should have been included, but were not. Somethings kinda fishy here.

      • MEC

        Most were from Saudi Arabia, but not all. Also you forget that, Saudi Arabia also helped us in the 2 Iraq wars. The Saudi’s are banning immigrants from some of the same countries that Trump us trying to ban. Trump named the countries based on our intelligence as to where the most likely threat is coming from.

        I don’t care if they were Christian countries, if they have vowed to destroy us, vet all immigrants from that county. It only makes common sense.

      • kate777

        Read again what I wrote, perhaps I did not make myself clear, but how does anyone know who the immigrants (refugees) are coming from as they, terrorists, can slip from one country into another as easily as I am writing this note. As to 9/11/2001 terrorists from Saudi Arabia, you are absolutely right as perhaps they should be included. I do not know why but even then that does not mean the others should not be too. Assuming we will have another attack? you bet I am assuming as it will happen as the Aim is to Conquer and they can’t just conquer a part of the World but need to conquer all of the World. They are doing their best with Europe now, France, Belgium, etc., and even Brittan is having problems. And if you think it is only violence, no, it also has to do with Laws. Sharia Law is not good. The U.S. can not and should not have Two Sets of Laws as that would not only be confusing but bad, therefore Only one must be the Law of the Land, and at present that is the U.S. Constitution which many would like to see done away with. So if you think that Terrorism is the only thing to be concerned about, you are wrong as many would like to see this country become some other government than our Republic U. S. Constitution.

        • Elliott Hankin

          If immigrants wNt Sharia law thats fine. They can go back to where they were able TO have it

        • Deplorable wizard

          How about,

          ALL incoming “refugees”, you folks talk about the 9-11 terrorists coming from saudi, bin laden was saudi, which means that al qeda was originally saudi, so what.

          How many of you remember that 4 of the 9-11 terrorists entered the U.S. via mexico?

          The question of “discrimination” can easily be overcome by requiring ALL immigrants to be subject to the indepth vetting process. Illegals caught but seeking refugee status should be housed in holding camps until properly processed.

          The whole reason there is refugees is because they don’t want to stay home and fight for their own country. Don’t anyone claim different, because it would be a lie. The terrorists slip in with the afraid knowing that governments allow wimps to run all over the world. It’s time to stop that practice.

        • Mathew Molk

          Who need to vet beyond being a moslem. – they ALL vow to eithher convert us and impose sheria law or kill us.

          It’s simple,,,moslem = terrorist.

      • jandjnesbitt@aol.com

        Those seven countries were Obysmal’s order….Trumps just following it through. Obysmal is all talk, no action…didn’t have the Balls, and is spineless… There is a new sheriff in town in case you haven’t heard. Trump will win…there will be a ban and a wall…and sanctuary cities are on their way out. What else do you need to know?…Get used Law and Order …Snowflake

        • Linda

          He doesn’t give a shit about Obamas orders! haven’t you heard??? So WHY, do you say he was “just following Obama”…NO.. HE DIDN’T HAVE THE BALLS TO DO IT RIGHT!!!

          • jandjnesbitt@aol.com

            It was Obysmals order for these same seven country’s…Do some research before you look stupid again… Libtard Snowflake…Go back to whining and crying yourself to sleep.

        • contrary1

          Well, mr or ms smartass, that still doesn’t explain to me why saudi arabia was not included. obama is out of office, regardless of who was on his list and since the 9/11 attackers were from saudi arabia, seems to me that country should have been first on the list

          • Peatro Giorgio

            Seems rather clear to us those whom are sufficiently capable of utilizing well reasoned logic. Saudi Arabias Government is fully functional. An completely capable of providing sufficient Identification of those persons who reside with in there nations borders.
            Unlike the seven nations which the President placed a temporary
            Travel ban . Those seven nation have neither a formal or world recognized Government . Get it now ? Trump hater.

          • mrpoohead

            Try again poop for brains!!!!!!!!!!!

          • Peatro Giorgio

            Hey Ass clown stalker if you wanted my dick You should have taken me up on my offer an met me in Italy. I definitely would have throat F### U after shattering your jaw.

          • mrpoohead

            Ahh – and here finally we have the coming out. It was only time Pea-brain. Are you wearing pink?

          • mrpoohead

            PS Italy – what was it, a week? Ten days – can’t have seen much. I once took a year to go from Cairo to Cape Town. I should stay at home in future – obviously anywhere else is way to scary. Sissy – an’ that’ll bring us nicely back to your bottom fixation. Oh, dear Pea-brain!

          • mrpoohead

            “us those whom are sufficiently capable of utilizing well reasoned logic. Saudi Arabias Government is fully functional.” Obviously you do not include yourself in the list of “capable”.

            Saudi Arabia is an absolute monarchy – fully functional government; well hardly. Most oppressive regime in the area; just about!

            “Populist” would imply a good percentage of the electorates vote – 25%; not really very close is it? “Police force” of the world – well over the last century we’ve done a good job of funding despots and dictators, stuck our noses into other’s business (Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan and Iraq – can’t “finish” either, tail between legs scenario)and single-handedly created today’s problems in the Middle East. Obviously history and politics not your strong point, suggest you stick to what you know best – suspect masturbation is your forte.

          • jandjnesbitt@aol.com

            Doesn’t matter. We have bigger fish to fry… When you allow a lowly Libtard Biased district court judge from podunk Libtard washington state to block a completely lawful and Constitutional Executive Order From The President of the United States…we have serious judicial problems that need to be immediately corrected.

          • bohicasis

            That Judge was Republican appointee. He truly believes in the application of the Constitution and that due process and the Establishment Clause mean what they say. If DT and the WH atty had worded the restriction properly and presented evidence , it would have been upheld. On the other hand, DT and his staff did not route his EO thru the OMB, then the DOJ as required . Filing paperwork, proper routing and wording is required. He is not surrounding himself with very bright people. Billionaires yes, but not those who know the process of law. Saw that clearly with DeVos. Absolutely no knowledge of federal law or that any existed pertaining to education.

          • jandjnesbitt@aol.com

            This court is libtard biased. That’s why the libtards used this court. Regardless of appointment. The order will pass and Trump will prevail.

          • bohicasis

            That simply makes no sense.The court to have the least turnover rate is the 10th district court. You just stated in another comment that the 9th “are overturned 85 to 90% of the time.” (which comes from Hannitys statements and he is incorrect.) How is the 9th “libtard” when they were appointed and nominated by the Republicans. So Republicans are “libtards” now? Another EO may pass but not until it is rewritten and then submits to the rules of process. It would suit the “so called President” to either surround himself with people who know the rules and correct paperwork procedures as well as how to present evidence or enough weight to a case to make it stand. I believe It only came before the courts as it did not follow proper procedure and was not based on fact. That left him wide him open. There were already restrictions in place and heavy vetting for folks trying to newly enter and we already have immigration laws in place. Those are and were being followed. Obama deported the highest number of illegal persons here during his term. Perhaps Trump was simply attempting to up his street cred via new EO displayed proudly in front of the cameras. Now,are you ready for your medicare, social security (all earned by each of us when we pay into the system )and tax dollars to be spent on a a massive wall. Or , are you going to pitch in and do the labor yourself ? This will cost you, your grand children and great grandchildren (should you have any) . Already we are in debt for the wars and munitions for generations to come from bombing countries into rubble for oil and back door deals

          • jandjnesbitt@aol.com

            LOL…dimwit libtard…The 9th circus court is undoubtedly the most liberal court in the country and has an average 80% reversal rate. In 2010 alone this court was reversed a startling 19 times or 79%…three times as many reversals as most circuits had cases before the Supreme Court…In 2011 71% and 2012 86%. The LA Times wrote: “This courts reputation for leftist judicial activism is Legendary”. “The American Bar Association has rated the 9th circus very poorly with the second lowest grade of any Federal Court”….This is the court that handed down decisions striking “under God” from the Pledge of Allegiance and finding Megan’s Law to be unconstitutional. Washington State is a Libtard nest of judicial activism which Clinton won and hasn’t had a republican governor in over 32 years. Perfect spot for this circus court to set up it’s Libtard activist business. Trump will prevail as the law is on his side…Libtards will lose again. Now get ready to go protest and cry yourself to sleep.

          • bohicasis

            Note: 9th Circuit extends from the Grand Canyon in Arizona, to the
            far reaches of Alaska, to the remote Northern Mariana Islands in the
            central Pacific, and represents a diverse legal and social ecosystem more
            likely to generate controversy warranting Supreme Court attention.

            If you look at the organization of the circuits, the geographic area
            covered by the 9th Circuit represents a lot of complex economic and
            social arrangements. Relative to other courts of appeal, it
            is very heterogeneous, in terms of the laws, policies, and population.
            So part of it is volume, but part of it does reflect the geographic
            area. Now compare the 9th to a district that covers far less territory.

            And still, the 10th had the highest rate of overturn

          • jandjnesbitt@aol.com

            You subscribe to, and are so gullible to Libtard Fake News that you actually believe this line of BS…You probably worship Soros… It’s a disease and you should get treatment ASAP. What I have stated is FACT. You’re a libtard Troll…and I will waste no more time on you. Just like with most Libtards…talking to you is like talking to a bucket of hammers. Have someone explain these facts and write them down for you, as you clearly don’t have the ability to comprehend. Democrooks have been crooked for so long…you don’t even know right from wrong.

      • Elliott Hankin

        Saudi Arabia should have been included. Also our safety needs to be enforced for EVERYONE which it is. Its not the courts decision to make. They shouldnt even have the authority to be involved

        • Linda

          BUT, he has “dealings” with the Saudi Prince…So, he doesn’t really care about us, now does he?, because, 16 of the 19 hijackers came from that country, and he “didn’t” put it on the list!! WONDER WHY!. That would have been a first choice, if you are doing what you said you were!

        • contrary1

          Have to disagree with you on your last point. We may agree that the decision made was not a correct one, but last time I checked, we had three branches of government, and the function of the courts is to review and determine legality and constitutionality of decisions and actions made by both the executive and legislative branches.

    • Linda

      Well, you are BLIND!

  • molson

    Did I miss the part where the ninth circuit court suddenly got interested in the law?

    • Lillyhammer Lip

      When it started to nip them in the butt.

    • jandjnesbitt@aol.com

      All this moron can do at most is delay the inevitable. He can file and delay but will be over ruled as per the laws of the land. Trump will prevail !!!

    • ourzoo10

      That is the ninth Circus court…lol

  • Vivi

    Everyone knows who is behind all this (soros) when his plug is pulled then the swamp willed finally be drained.

    • Gloria D.

      President Trump must incarcerate him…give him lethal injection so he can never do damage again.

      • Mt Native

        They just need to be sure they take his sons with him or they will just step in and take over what the old man has started. In fact I think one of them already has stepped in.

        • ourzoo10

          Yes, his name is Alexander..even nastier (if that’s possible) than his daddy.

          • Mt Native

            That figures and I suppose he is a US citizen. Damn, will we ever be rid of these people???

      • Michael Dennewitz

        He’d have to nail soros’ son too Gloria. His son is far worse than geo.. 😣😠

        • Gloria D.

          GOD HELP US….

  • Mark Shaw

    I’m so sick and tired of this crap the judge ishh a sore looser and this is his hissy fit period. Anyone that is smart enough to read needs to put thier faces in the constitution and read it and they hopefully will then see the truth. We all also need to wake up to the fact that Islam is not a religion it it an archaic culture of suppression and death it in itself is comparable with what Hitler believed in a master race. Um so do they if your not under the umbrella of Islam you should be killed. Let be real a call a spade a spade and not a heart. People are saying we are in a constitutional crisis I agree because if we get enugh of this cancer in our country they will push sharia law and our bill of rights and constitution go down the drain. We fought to be free and the more Islam comes into this great nation the more it will look like the 7 countries that are banned. They are invading not immigrating.

    • jobird

      Excellent post!Cicero gave a speech about the “Enemy inside the Gate”These are our enemy who
      are already inside and growing daily.If this influx is not stopped America will be just like Europe and
      then the game is over.

      • Mark Shaw

        Thanks I appreciate your kind words usually I just get hate and name calling. We seem to live in a world where there is anything but normal civil discussion on a subject. You are absolutely right about Europe but there is still time for them to turn this around but it is important that they act right now.

        • searcher98

          Amen, brother

    • searcher98

      Anyone wishing to read the Constitution should contact Hillsdale College for a FREE copy.
      Signed: A Hillsdale supporter

  • Julia

    Liberal American’s need to step back as the rest of us endured the torture of Obama for 8 long years and watched as he destroyed so much. I can imagine the even liberals would not like the guarantee of safety in this country. Obama pretty much brain-washed our young people and as a parent I will take back that control as GOD is what made this country good and the Obama Administration shunned him. I guess they forgot the verse that says if you deny me; I will deny you.

    • destiny

      Osambo is going to fry in hell. He is a gay muslim lliving with a tranny.

    • Mathew Molk

      No prob. – All “refugees go to Seattle or Duluth and of they are cought outside the city limits they are subject to immediate deportation. They want ‘um, they can have ‘um. Want to bet inside of a month they will be screaming for mercy.

  • Shira Levin

    I am outraged that a Judge showed such blatant disregard for President Trump’s rightful authority! President Trump is right in wanting to protect US citizens from terrorists attacks. SHAME on Judge Robart risking the safety and security of US citizens for the sake of politics!

    • jandjnesbitt@aol.com

      His Libtard principles far out weigh the safety and security of the American people. It’s the way all libtards are…Very creepy, sick and disgusting individuals. However this judge has over stepped his bounds…Trump will be victorious.

      • Shira Levin

        I agree. Another problem with the people you mentioned is that they are globalists.

        • 094870

          Then maybe it should be televised all over the WORLD so veryone will see it,what do you think?

          • Shira Levin

            That reads like an idea worth considering.

      • John

        That so called judge should step down or be impeached!!

        • Millie Karnop

          AMEN

    • Elliott Hankin

      Robsrt is a piece of shit and has been obviously living in another world. Hes a corrupt asshole that doesnt want to see whats going on in the world. Right here in Dearborn there were confrontations between Muslims and Christians as well as whats happened in France and Germany. What kind of incompetant shit is he anyway? Tell him to fk off

    • destiny

      Does this judge have bodyguards?

      • Shira Levin

        I don’t know if Judge Robart has bodyguards.

      • 094870

        I don’t think that will help him any.

  • Mojo

    When my friend and neighbor became a Judge, we were with him at their house for dinner.
    After dinner, the Judge’s wife finished the dishes and asked he husband to “take out the garbage.”
    The Judge smartly replied, “BUT I’M A JUDGE NOW.’
    Whereupon his wife quickly replied:
    ok, “GO PUT ON YOUR ROBES AND THEN TAKE OUT THE GARBAGE.”

    • Mary Muennig

      Thank you.

      • Mojo

        Your Welcome Mary,
        I wasn’t sure that some of the folks who post would understand/
        Another Tid Bit you might enjoy:
        When my son was studying Law, he often had fellow students study with him at our home. One very clever & smart young lady was particularly enjoyable to have around.
        A few years later, this young gal became a Judge. After her election, a local newspaper asked her at a news conference the following snarky question;
        “What will you do when TWO opposing Attorneys come before you and you realize BOTH contributed to your campaign?
        She was quick to reply:
        “I GUESS I’LL HAVE TO DECIDE THAT CASE BY APPLYING THE LAW.”

    • John

      At least he knew how to deal with “garbage” unlike this liberal knothead that halted President Trump’s Executive order!!

      • Mathew Molk

        Could see these cupcakes pulling anything like this during WW II? They would have been lynched.

  • Eric Pearson

    This is all so much bullshit. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about. Judges are put on the bench for a reason. It’s called checks and balances. Read the Judge’s opinion. It makes perfect sense. Trump’s executive order is nothing more than theater. That’s what he does. It’s all for show. Not a single terrorist from any of the banned countries has ever perpetrated a terrorist act on American soil. If this was really about keeping America safe, Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia would’ve been included on the banned list. Trump’s business interests in those countries kept them off the list. When you become a judge, you can be a yes man for Donald. Until then your right wing lies and propaganda are nothing more than a display of your own ignorance and unparalleled stupidity.

    • Mojo

      I guess Eric would approve of getting rid of both The Executive & The Legislative branches of government. He’d find a way to say roar makes sense.
      Of course he means NONSENSE

    • randy jackson

      Have you seen the short video (directly above) from a Marine deployed in Iraq?

    • MEC

      You obviously don’t understand what the Judges part in the checks and balances. Immigration, is not within their constitutional boundaries for review. Immigration is one of those areas where the president has sole discretion on which countries from which we will accept immigrants.

      Was obama’s EO order theater,, or Bushes or Clintons. Where were these concerned groups and judges then. The judges behavior is where the theater and stage are set up. Pelosi and Waters are auditioning for star roles as well.

    • marinemike

      The seven countries listed were determined by the Obama State Department to be the highest concentration of terrorist activity and legislation was passed that named these countries as such an indicated that better vetting of immigrants form these countries was necessary. Furthermore, the President’s travel ban is also authorized by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952.

      What is strange is that in 2011 Mr. Obama placed a six month travel ban on person from Iraq, without Congressional approval per se and with out objection by liberals. Mr. Obama acted under the authority of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which you will note is the same authority that Mr. Trump issued in executive order of January 27, 2017. Judge Robart erred in his opinion as the executive branch has always had great deal of latitude in immigration policy and is charged with determining quotas etc. from each country or geographical region.

      • Mike W

        Obama also ordered that Haitian refugees be turned back at sea and the wet foot dry foot law for Cuban’s etc was revoked by Obama. The last I looked neither the Cuban’s or Haitian’s have been involved in any type of terrorist activity – they just made the mistake of crossing Obama/Clinton. I hope Obama/Clinton will be held accountable soon

      • Eric Pearson

        The 7 countries in question were listed by The Obama Administration as places that were dangerous to travel to, not from. This order by an unhinged, thin skinned, narcissistic, bully is exactly what R. Giuliani said it was, a Muslim ban, and it’s unconstitutional. To say the more vetting is needed is just not true.
        I know Trump supporters will support him no matter what. He said it himself. He could murder someone in Times Square and his supporters would still support him. So, this is exactly what I expect. You’ll defend any and all actions by this group of pecans until they do something that has a direct adverse affect on you. That will probably come to pass eventually.

  • Tome

    Minnesota is about 50% Muslim! I can’t understand Why a two bit judge could knock a presidentual order! Washington is on a one way trip down the tube like Oregon And Califonication The whole West coast is down the tube!

    • Mary Muennig

      Wow, thank you for the information regarding Minnesota. Regarding your second statement, I can’t understand why a “two bit judge” could knock down a presidential order either. President Trump, and his administration, know very well that he is very right and he is going to be just fine when he gets finished with what he’s doing because he is going to be so happy in heaven with everybody like me and you who are going to be up there with him. And that’s all I have to say about that. I hope you have a very nice rest of your day.

    • destiny

      Colorado is fast tracking to be like California. Hickenlooper is a delusional puppet and the mayor is also a leftist. We need a Republican governor. Get rid of the dems like Michael Bennett and Degette.

  • Billy Williams

    If they look deep enough they will probably find that he took a bribe from Obama & Hillary. He sure isn’t looking out for the American people and should be removed from being a Supreme Court Judge.

    • Jeffrey A Douglass Sr.

      Rich people can do what the rest of can’t. He probably slipped past the vetting process. He should be exported. He has money, he can buy anything. He has a weakness, the arrogance that comes from wealth almost assure there is illegal activity. And others know what it is..

    • Stargeezer

      They’ve already done that. That judge was appointed by Bush, but he’s a old time Demwit, gave big money to Hillbilly and supports BLM (I don’t understand that at all). He was just another of Bush’s bad choices. I liked George Bush as a person, thought he might have more backbone than his Dad did, he didn’t. Which gave us the past 8 years with the Islamic dope smoking pinhead community agitator intentionally screwing up everything he could get his hands into.

  • jimdarnall

    These court Justices are actually in violation of the president’s power when it comes to blocking non American immigrants that preasent a threat to our security. This Judge needs to be impeached. The president has every right to block these people from entering our nation. The constituion does not even protect them as they are not citizens of the U.S. in the first place. God help us when we allow any of the Juducial branch making our security decisions.

    • Elliott Hankin

      The judges are corrupt bastards who need to be fed to radicals here then maybe that will help them understand what they are capable of

      • Mike W

        I’d give him an all expenses paid vacation to Baghdad

    • theseer

      ENFORCE PUBLIC LAW 414, PAGE 2, SECTION 212 THAT BANS ALL MUSLIMS FROM THIS COUNTRY.

      JEFFERSON 200 YEARS AGO FOUGHT A WAR AGAINST ISLAM AND WE ARE STILL AT WAR WITH THEM.

      • Bill

        In 1492, while Columbus was discovering America, Ferdinand and Isabella were driving the Moors out of Granada after 781 years of Moslem occupation of Spain by force, and the city of Vienna, Austria, was attempting to repel the Turks that were bombarding its city walls. Now, only 500-odd years later, how does Europe forget all of this and think that it needs to overwhelm its cultures and political institutions with massive Moslem immigration? This is a dream come true for Islamists, and their socialist “progressive” leaders just bend over for it!

        Here, in America, where not very many people seem to know much history AT ALL, this suicidal deception from the traitors among us could easily get past a lot of “goodhearted” people, but thanks be to God (not murderous Allah) that at least some people are waking up! The West has been in a 1,300 year war against Islamic aggression, and Americans don’t even know about it, except for those “evil” Crusaders who tried to hold them back. At least Jefferson knew about this continuing war. “Liberal” doctrine is suicidal as well as treasonous. A nation that would be free is inherently tolerant, but to stay free it cannot afford any longer to be tolerant of the leftist agenda. This is no longer a question of being “fair to everyone”; it is now a question of whether we will protect our way of life, or we will make a final surrender and permanently accept tyranny and the silencing of the voice of the people. “Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure.” So far, the war is relatively civil and a debate of words and policies. May America re-establish its principles before it comes to anything worse.

        • John

          Wow…outstanding post Bill!

        • Mathew Molk

          Right on my friend….Peaceful coexistence with moslems is like peaceful coexistence with cancer. – You kill it or it kills you. It’s just that simple.

          I don’t care what they do “over there” – It’s none of my business, Just don’t bring it “over here” or I will fight to destroy the moslem invaders, and I don’t care what country or race they are, even if they were born here. Since their filthy koran say i have to convert and submit to their twisted sheria law or they will kill me and my family they can leave my country or die here.

      • Kyser Roksen
      • Progressive Republican

        Wrong twice!

      • randi amundsen

        I also read the same thing

    • John

      Impeached or hung!!

    • jimmy midnight

      President CAN issue this sort of order, but probably CAN’T include a religious test in it. Now, the courts R gonna settle it.

      For better or worser, we all know it’s the American way.

      • Mathew Molk

        No mention of any religion at all in the order including moslem (which is a philosophy and not a religion)

        • jimmy midnight

          Yeah, but “religious minorities” R mentioned and preferred, so both intent and effect R anti-Islamic discriminatory, And it’s quite obvious.

          As for being, “A political ideology, not a religion,” there’s not a faith tradition on planet Earth, about which that couldn’t B said–with some justification, and a glaring lack of human respect. Unless it’s tribal religions.

        • Eric Hartman

          Not a religion. Tell the 1.6 Billion Muslims in the world that. Maybe that is one reason they are so pissed off.

    • Eric Hartman

      Really! How long has it been since you took a civics class? Or perhaps I should ask if you have ever taken a civics class. Oh, it was an alternate civics class…I get it now.

  • Joseph Kiesznoski

    You got that right.

    • Mary Muennig

      I’ll tell you what, there are a whole lot of people that really need to receive some sort of disciplinary action for high treason–and I am not joking either.

  • Mario Ruffino

    The McCarran-Walter Act gives the president the authority to do what he did, it is the judge that broke the law.The judge should be impeached.

    • Mary Muennig

      Thank you very much.

    • Mark Shaw

      Absolutely he should his ego and ideals have clouded his ability to do the job.

  • CrustyOldGeezer

    It’s PAST TIME to REMOVE CORRUPT ‘judges’ that rule AGAINST the Constitution!

    Remove their citizenship and deport them immediately.

    That’s ‘deport’ as in Send them to GUANTANAMO for a few Q&A sessions.

  • panchoVilladeltren

    One thing ALL Americans should be united on is:
    GIT RID of ALL Muslim trash. ISLAM = Terrorist scum. They are as much as religion as the drug cartels.
    The closest thing they have to a religion is praying for our destruction, in our own country, at that.
    Time to sweep the trash out, and keep it out.

  • Michael Mcraven

    We need to come together and March and riot against this judges Rodart ruling,,,just like the assholes did in Washington,,,protest this kind of bullshit from these judges and have this halfwitt barred from the bench,,,

  • panchoVilladeltren

    If you have a bowl of candy, and only three are poisoned, would you eat any?
    By the same reasoning, NO Muslim should ever step foot here, unless he is under guard, and is coming to stand trial.

  • meangreenMarine

    The 9th Circuit Ciurt has long been known as the most liberal Federal Court in the Country!
    Remember, they are all appointees based on politically generated recommendations!
    Their ruling is NOT a review of the LAW but the release of their progressive philosophy!
    The President has the authority to do what he did, since he has the legal responsibility to ensure the safety of American Citizens, not some Judges in California!

  • Ken Thomas

    One of the main reasons the time has come to abolish lifetime tenure for ALL judges and for the Senate to make null and void the power of judicial revue which was stolen by John Marshall in 1804.

  • Allan Zaug

    More liberal judge decisions, controlled by democrats, who have lost over a thousand seats to republicans over the last eight years of Obama. With the loss of presidency they are desperate to control everything or anything. Im afraid at this point the only thing they’ll control is the loss of more seats.

  • Bill Smith

    I don’t think the Judge knows the law!He should be a Justice of the peace !George Soros and Obama are still trying to destroy America!Why in the Hell can’t something be done about their Bullshit!

  • destiny

    Get rid of most agencies by cutting funding.

  • destiny

    Whenever I mark my ballot, I vote no on retaining incumbent judges. Never keep them in office. Now I do the same with house of reps and senators. It keeps them on their toes.

    • Deplorable Lanie

      I do the same thing, incumbents get too comfortable and quit working FOR the PEOPLE!

  • Michael

    This judge was put in by President Bush and who is that family in cahoots with, Obama and Clinton.

  • fullclarity

    America has an independent judiciary, for good reason. Let’s see how the court process proceeds. Those who want to drain the swamp need only look to the current Cabinet. That’s the swamp, along with much of Congress.

  • Shawn Sapp

    When we get attacked again on our own soil all of the nut jobs are going to blame Trump. That may even be their plan. They certainly are not above something like that. WHEN it happens we should drag all of those smug idiots to the same spot and show them what they have done. And then kill them in the same manner. They will never learn, they can’t be taught any other way. So let THEM die.

    • fisherman

      It is my sincere hope that IF another attack happens because this and other liberals are conspiring to undermine President Trump, That it is their homes and their families that are directly affected. Watching them caused such great pain would bring me such great joy. Wake up America, this is not a matter of Democrat or Republican, left or right, liberal or conservative. This is a matter of life or death, OURS, wake the hell up.

  • dog lover

    KEEP AMERICA SAFE
    KEEP AMERICAN CITIZENS SAFE

  • Michael Dennewitz

    Maybe the judge is a damned mooseslime, or worse yet, QUEER! Then again, perhaps soros has him on his payroll?? 😣😕😯

  • Carey

    You guys need to go to http://www.snopes.com/islam-banned-u-s-1952/
    to learn more about the law banning Muslims.

  • Natalie

    I hope leftist Judges who rule based on feelings and their personal political leanings are on the list of ‘insane liberal nonsense garbage Obama left behind’ that must go now that the rational adults are back in the drivers seat.
    Cannot wait until all the Frootloops are weeded out, so this country can grow strong and prosper again.

  • Deplorable Lanie

    Is he kidding? The States will face “irreparable injury” if the ban doesn’t STAY IN PLACE! Can these idiots not see that President Trump is trying to SAVE AMERICAN LIVES! It is Obama who didn’t care about us. Did everyone read the article where the former refugee worker said the President Obama did NO VETTING of the refugees and they were not allowed to even ask questions. They were told to BELIEVE EVERYTHING the refugees said?????? If this ban does not stay in place and these individuals are not properly vetted then American lives are at stake. So that Judge needs to wake the hell up and get on board with saving AMERICAN lives!

  • Borninbrooklyn

    Seems that the “Trend”, which started on ovomits watch, to only enforce the laws that are beneficial to “them”, is continuing.
    That SOB Judge, he just made MY life, and the life of my FAMILY less safer with his assinine “ruling”!

  • silverbackV

    Recall efforts should be underway NOW to remove activist judges from the bench, they are NOT a benefit to society. We have back bone now, let’s move.

  • Bruce in AZ

    Anybody ever hear of the cornerstone of our government “Separation of Powers”? No way a single judge can overrule a president in exercising his statutory powers. Anti-American. Trump was very restrained in his response.

    • Papa Bear

      For President Trump, that was VERY restrained. He was clear and concise in his response addressing the exact point that needed to be addressed. Perhaps if he had just said that the Judge “acted stupidly” without properly backing up his claim, the main stream media and everyone else who has their panties in a wad now, would have fallen in line as they did when Mr. Obama stated that a public official in the capacity of a LEO “acted stupidly” … just saying :-)

  • jandjnesbitt@aol.com

    There are serious issues when a liberal biased state district court judge from a liberal biased Washington State can block a legal and Constitutional Presidential order. They just entered the SWAMP….NOW DRAIN IT !!!!!…Dissolve this 9th district court !!!!!

    • Papa Bear

      Arizona is already considering asking to leave the 9th District so what does that tell you?

    • bohicasis

      He was a GOP appointee. The vote to select and appoint him was 99-0. He was appointed during Bushs term. Not a libtard_simply adhering to law, proper wording pertaining to filing . The WH had a chance to refute and as i listened to the WH atty_the case was lacking. No evidence presented. NADA. And when it was re-presented …they had nothing new> No evidence, no new arguments . The WH atty then said they needed more time to prepare. WTH! Preparation is key for any case and for any filing.

      • jandjnesbitt@aol.com

        LOL…there is no law behind this biased ruling. The law is clearly with Trump and his order is constitutionally protected. All this biased judge and 9th district libtard court can do is delay the inevitable…they have a history of this biased action and are overturned 85 to 90% of the time…which is all any of these tactics being used by democrooks and their biased court tactics can do… Trump will prevail !!!

        • bohicasis

          You must have been watching Hannity on Fox. He was the one who stated the 9th district had that turnover rate_which is incorrect. Do a little research first. The EO also missed routing thru the OMB which is required. So the Republicans didn’t quite do their research either on how to file and and have upheld an EO. Just like basic court paperwork…if it isn’t filed properly, it can not be executed or upheld. Refile, resubmit. When it came before the 9th, the Republican or WH atty did not have any weight or base the EO to be upheld. It went back before the courts, 3 more judges Again no evidence for the EO cited. Either there is none or the WH atty is not qualified. The WH Atty stated he was unprepared in the end. Well, if one is unprepared to cite evidence or have enough weight to the case for a decision to be made in their favor than they dont win. Simple as that. Note: Under these guidelines, a proposed executive order must have a title and must reference the legislative or constitution authority that governs it.They require submission of the order, with seven copies, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). If the OMB approves it, it then goes to the Attorney General.Once the legal review is complete, the executive order proceeds to a review of physical form and format.Once cleared, the order makes its way back to the President for his signature.If the staff and the President dont know the rules of the game, then they are not qualified to play a winning hand. The President is free to ignore the procedure but in doing so it can come before the courts. Perhaps the “so called President” should pay attention and read a bit more rather than relying on his cable network binging and appointee to feed him information. I find it ludicrous that he had not idea of a paper he was signing that itincluded Bannon . Bannon simply put paperwork in front of him and Trump signed it. Trump may feel as if he is the head player but he is going to get played. He is not choosing appointees wisely. Bannon is out for more power to inflict his ideologies and agendas and Pence is on the sidelines. Watch and see .

          • jandjnesbitt@aol.com

            You’ve made it very clear that Libtard Bias has you by the throat and choking the sense out of you. This has nothing to do with Hannity…It’s Fact. Get your facts straight and stop looking like the libtard cockroach you are. You Libtards are done. The only thing you have left is the whining and crying… Get over it snowflake and get used to Law and Order…. God Bless America and God Bless President Donald J.Trump and his Beautiful Family.

          • bohicasis

            It was Hannity who stated the 9th has the most overturned. Look it up. In attempting to discern where that information came from. It is not fact that that the 9th has the highest over turn rates. One judge during the last hearing was trying to help prove Trumps case for the EO but the WH did not have their case based on the 4 corners of the text . I have no issues with Hannity but it was his statement. I cited the laws and procedures for. I am far from liberal. If one can not follow the procedures than it is their downfall. Trump is not the only republican president to issue EOs. Each followed procedures and had weight to their case as well as factual evidence. Law and Order did happen in this instance . Bless America. Happy to have been born here and am able to travel freely at my discretion. Your bias is showing simply by the words you choose to describe those who do not run full head into loving the current POTUS. If he wants to succeed than it would best suit him to have knowledgeable staff in place. He has already been back stabbed once by Bannon. I suggest you read the procedures for EOs along with Bannons ideology and the history on the remainder of Trumps cabinet choices. All of their statements over decades can be researched thru the positions they previously held on any government websites , submitting of laws and archived discussions. When you can cite those, come on back. Using phrases coined by chanters does not make your case. Simple phrases such as “Libtard’ and “Snowflake” does not deflect from law. The coined party lines do nothing

          • bohicasis

            I had an extended reply but decided you are not worth responding to. All i read is you towing the party line and newly coined words. Learn a few more as they arent cutting it.

            https://media.giphy.com/media/HtHQEafAxGP4Y/giphy.gif

  • Mike Thomas

    President Trump now needs to tell the states that want these refugees can take them, no, if, and or buts about it. No tax payers money from the rest of U.S. to fund their stay here, they want them then they can support them. These idiots do not understand the mentality nor the concept of Islam, control of the world through Sharia Law.
    Should any American Citizen ,from now on, be killed by a Muslim, we need to sue the pants off these judges and hold all accountable for allowing it to happen.

  • Monica

    At my 21 years old I registered to vote from that time I am Republican because I like my country;but I am analyses that Democrats are more corrupt but all the time get was they want; My personal opinion some Rep. cover them self at Rep but have their feeling like Dem. My point it they do not work with the people of USA what they doing in the W.H ; they prefer to help the outsider. McCain, Lindsey, chuck, Jack reed; what they doing in the W.H they don’t do anything an they don let Trump to perform his job; we the people have to change those people; they are being to long in the W.H.

  • Mario Ruffino

    Is there any wonder why our country is in dire straights. Last night Maxine Walters referred to the “Russian War with Korea” and Pelosi said the Democrats are unable to work with President Bush. These people are in the US Congress, how the hell do they get elected, they are total retards.

  • davegrille

    The courts were not even justified in giving the cases hearings .

    • Papa Bear

      Never forget that MOST lawyers are MASTERS at making mountains out of mole hills and very cunningly wording their motions before the Courts to manipulate the truth into falsehoods and falsehoods to appear to be the truth. There is NO SUCH THING as justice in our Civil legal system, period. It is all about who tells the best story and damn the consequences to everyone else in the process.

      • davegrille

        I understand your point of view .

  • Patriot47

    THIS BS MUST BE STOPPED. Liberals need to be stopped from doing whatever they want regardless of laws prohibiting their actions.

  • http://WWW.SPIRITOFAMERICAPARTYRADIOSHOW.COM TOM P O’DONNELL

    BY 2018 TRUMP WILL HAVE 15 MORE SENATORS AND 50 MORE CONGRESSMEN. THE BEAT GOES ON. VIVA EL TRUMPO, VIVA CHRISTO REY.

  • Lindacphipps

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours & have longer with friends and family! !sc360c:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    !sc360c:
    ➽➽
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialCashJobs650WebCommunityGetPaid$97/Hour ★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫★★★✫::::::!sc360c:….,……

  • Joseph

    The ruling only hold weight IF the president decides to follow it. Fore, a courts ruling only has sway IF one voluntarily abides BT it. The court has NO enforcement power. The only reason they’re followed is do to the rule of law. If court, or series of courts, rule not on law but on feelings. Not on precedent but on what’s popular at the time, then any such ruling should be ignored. There is history of a court being ignored. Right or wrong it show how delicate the balance is. If the 9th rules in any way other than for the office of president then it should be ignored, marginalized, refunded, and its judges removed. All which are within the scope and power of the president!

  • CrustyOldGeezer

    The Administration has the Authority to arrest the judges and turn them over to the Military for a Tribunal hearing because their actions were a direct assault on the Constitution.

    The judicial system is for LEGISLATED trials,

    Attacks against the Constitution are acts of War against the PEOPLE.

    • Bachelor With Sense

      VERY nicely stated!

  • David Stewart

    Judges are NOT to legislate; different function entirely!

  • CrustyOldGeezer

    Since the Supreme Court Justices are appointed FOR LIFE as created by the Constitution, and the district circuit courts are created by the legislature…

    WHERE IS IT WRITTEN that those POLITICAL APPOINTEES are for life?

    And why are there more than 20 ‘justus’ on the court when some have done nothing for years?

    THAT needs to be looked at by TRUMP as well.

  • country boy

    President Trump was correct when he said, ” so called judge “. judges do not make laws or interpret them too mean something other than what they really are. A judge is supposed too follow the law. PERIOD

  • James Bryson

    The 9th Circuit bench asked the attorney representing President Trump “Did they have any evidence” that terrorist were coming from the 7 war/terrorism ravaged, Middle Eastern/Southwest Asian counties affected by the 90-day delay.

    I want to acknowledge the restraint shown in his response.

    I was expecting something like… Does Smokey Bear defecate in the woods?

    • del

      Lolol

    • Papa Bear

      That Judge probably doesn’t even know who Smokey the Bear was :-) lol

    • bttrap

      and where did they come from before these countrys

  • Norman Fox

    More typical snowflakes and leftist trying to have it their way or the highway. What a bunch of losers. The president will prevail. The snowflakes well they will melt away.

    • Morton99

      It looks more like the so called president is trying to tail gate the judiciary. They have not even ruled and he is trying to force them off the highway.

  • susmart3

    That “so-called judge” that you so hate is a Bush administration appointee. And no president is above the rule of law. (In our country at least.) So he may have to go through appeals before he gets his way. Why the rush?

    • Kenny Albert

      He is only enforcing a law that is already on the books.

    • bttrap

      we don’t want more cells in the u.s. this is the only way to keep them out thats the rush to pass this ban

      • susmart3

        Well then, why not just but a ban on *ANYONE* coming in, while his team has time to review/improve the vetting process?

    • Bachelor With Sense

      That “so-called judge” was a Liberal appointed by Bush because he was being “inclusive” instead of eliminating DemonRats!

      • susmart3

        Right! Keep telling yourself that!

  • Karen

    DRAIN THE SWAMP!!

  • del

    What a boondoggle from the 9th Circus court as Rush calls it!

    • Papa Bear

      Heard him make that comment and laughed my ass off but then thought about it and realized that it really was true, the 9th is nothing BUT a circus and boy do they have the clowns!! :-) lol

  • Karen

    Trump should EXTEND his EO to 6 months instead of 90 days just to show the liberals(shove the knife deeper) while at the same time he will extend the safety of our country! GO TRUMP!!

    • Kenny Albert

      Don’t stop there. Put an 8 year ban in them.

  • Tiger

    Ban is the same as Temporary “Hold” it is the same thing. Plus according to the law Trump does have the right to “Ban” any group of people he wants to that is detrimental to our security and he was right there were 78 crimes committed by refugee that were not reported. I can a few off the top of my head.

    Five year old mentally challenged girl raped and mush more by 3 savage refugee boys, boys imagine what they will be when grown and Lynch went and told the people of that area you say anything bad and start problems for these refugees I will prosecute you.
    Woman raped by savage Somali at a gas station where she worked and hollering Allah Akbar.
    Somalian man went to Walmart in Texas and had a shootout.

    Too boot anyone who has to ask the question, has any refugee from the countries named been a problem only has to look to Europe, suffering a rape crisis and crime that American news including FOX won’t show you.

    This kind of ignorance is unacceptable and puts us all in danger and I have said it, along with millions of others for years, what people don’t know about Islam will kill us all.

    • Morton99

      The ‘so called’ president does NOT have any more than one third of the nation;s political power. He must respect the judiciary and the wisdom of the Founders in making the so called president accountable for his whims.

      • bttrap

        one third does not win an election you babies have to stop crying It’s over you will have to put up with it we didn’t cry and protest when obambie got in you are not going to change anything the people have finally spoken we are tired of political democrats not doing their job

        • Morton99

          No matter how hard you try to ignore it, a president only ever has 1/3 of the political power. I wish he would over-step. We could then impeach him and get on with the business of running this nation with a legitimate president.

          • bttrap

            like obambie did when he gave up three isis for a deserter, this presidenr should of been impeached; your idea of a legitmate president is wrong maybe you should visit some of these countries and watch them how they treat their prisoners before they set them on fire in a cage or chop off their heads on t.v.

          • Libs R Loons

            You’re a bit late, O law school school flunker.
            Obama’s out of the WH, so it’s too little-too late on your part.

      • Papa Bear

        Why is it ONLY NOW that you all of a sudden what to hold the President accountable for his actions? I can only guess that your head was so far up your ass for the last eight years that you never noticed what was going on in the real world. Get a life!! :-) lol

      • Tiger

        The President is the Executive Branch and the Judiciary is to interpret the law not be political and if they went by that standard there would have been no discussion. You don’t know he has the right by the Constitution and other laws to do this? You don’t know that other presidents have done this?

        NO the judiciary does not call political and moral judgements they are only there to make sure everything is within the law.

        • Morton99

          They are there to interpret the law yes. And that includes holding the Executive accountable to both the law of the land and the Constitution.He has broad ability to deal with foreign affairs but that power has been limited by both statute and by the Constitution. Mr Trump has already lost the confidence of a huge number of Americans that he is willing to observe the law – particularly in his many ethics violations – and also his intent to circumvent judicial and Constitutional oversight. That is why his many utterances of his intention to ban Muslims during the long election season is still pertinent. Yes intent is a part of the oversight that the judiciary may use to rein him in.

          • Tiger

            You are full of shit and make no mistake about that it needs no other interpretation you are full of shit.

            He has done nothing you say and you will have to get used to law and order again and not emotional hogwash.

      • Tiger

        The President of this United(Divided between the Real people and the Lunatics) is Donald J. Trump and nothing he has done has been whimsical. Like Obama did. Trump knows the law and he is doing exactly what he told us he would do and he told us how he was going to do it. If you people would have taken the time to LISTEN to his rallies so you would know what he said, instead of listening to FAKE news you would understand what is going on.

        For Immediate Release Contact: Robert Romano

        Jan. 30, 2017 Phone: 703-383-0880 ext. 106

        Obama is wrong, Trump executive order on travel does not discriminate on the basis of religion

        Jan.
        30, 2017, Fairfax, Va.—Americans for Limited Government President Rick
        Manning today issued the following statement blasting former President Barack Obama’s statement via spokesperson Kevin Lewis that President Donald Trump’s executive order temporarily blocking travel from countries invoked by the 2015 exceptions to the visa waiver program stipulated under 8 U.S.C. Section 1187(a)(12),
        which include Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Libya, Yemen and Somalia,
        “discriminat[es] against individuals because of their faith or
        religion”:

        “The
        Trump executive order barring travel for 90 days from terror hotspots
        does not discriminate on the basis of religion, as Obama well knows. In
        2011 the State Department stopped processing refugees from Iraq for six
        months, not because of religion, but after the FBI caught al Qaeda terrorists in Kentucky who had snuck into the country posing as refugees.
        It is a fact that Obama himself as president issued three so-called
        212(f) travels bans, as presidents have broad authority to do so under 8 U.S.C. Section 1182(f), which
        was never repealed by the 1965 Immigration Act and therefore can only
        be read as a presidential exception in order for the two statutes to be
        read consistently. That is out 16 such travel active bans that were issued by presidents over the years prior to Trump’s inauguration.

        “The
        law states explicitly the president may ‘suspend the entry of all
        aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose
        on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate,’
        the same broad authority Trump is now relying upon in addition to his
        grant of executive power under Article II of the Constitution.

        “There
        are about 50 majority Muslim countries throughout the world. The Trump
        travel ban affects seven, which are known terror hotspots. In
        confronting radical Islam, focusing on those regions most affected by
        the conflict is a common-sense place to start. In Nov. 2015, before then-candidate Trump issued his own statement on this issue, Americans for Limited Government urged an even broader travel ban
        than what Trump has issued in light of the Paris terrorist attacks.
        Addressing this issue is long overdue, and will grant the U.S. the time
        it needs to reevaluate its broken immigration system and refugee
        programs, and if necessary, to expand these efforts in order to best
        protect the American people.”

        To view online: http://getliberty.org/2017/01/obama-is-wrong-trump-executive-order-on-travel-does-not-discriminate-on-the-basis-of-religion/

        Attachments:

        “Trump’s Exclusion of Aliens from Specific Countries Is Legal, by Andrew McCarthy,” National Review, Jan. 30, 2017 at http://www.nationalreview.com/article/444371/donald-trump-executive-order-ban-entry-seven-muslim-majority-countries-legal

        Interview Availability: Please contact Americans for Limited Government at 703-383-0880 ext. 106 or at media@limitgov.org to arrange an interview with ALG experts including ALG President Rick Manning.

        • Morton99

          There is little point in discussing this with you not only because you quote the opinions of ultra right wing radicals with many incorrect facts. The legality of Trump’s actions must be subjected to some complex legal argument and speculating on the rights and wrongs of his actions using propaganda is a complete waste of time and effort. Suffice it to say that Trump is probably about to get more law suits now related to ethics violations – as if he were not named in enough already – nearly 50 at last count.
          Trumps own history of more than 4,500 law suits itself indicates that his knowledge of right and wrong appears to be at a minimum very hazy – he lost the last one when sued for fraud over the Trump University scam and was forced to settle with $ 25 millions in reparations to those he ripped off.

          • Tiger

            You wouldn’t know a fact if it socked you in the face and sat on your chest. Absolutely wrong, Trump had the legal authority and no moral questions or arguments came into play please read the law and then read the Constitution. Why were you not this concerned when Obama stomped all over the Constitution, bypassed Congress, rewrote law using EO and it went to the courts and still there, let go Gitmo schmucks and in the end criminals and Manning and others?

            Trump can have all the suits they want the facts are ethnic rights of any kind are being violated. It is our right to choose who comes into this country and the presidents responsibility to protect us and our Constitutional rights and all those in our documents apply only to American citizens not people of the world.

            You are a wooden noggin and right no use giving you facts.

          • Morton99

            You are really ignorant. Trump does not have the power to interpret the law. He must obey it. Who are you to claim that he has that legal authority ? The law is far too complex to understand by political shills which is exactly why we have an independent judiciary.

          • Tiger

            Keep talking digging a really big hole yo are. The president has advisors who know the laws of the land and like General Kelly said at the news conference these teams looked over the EO before Trump issued it and the other laws, which you friggin need to read and it is all above board. Trump is not Obama the lawless.

          • Tiger

            Listen listen and listen. This was no whim, this was not unlawful and it was backed by all our security people and the countries named were named by Obama and congress before this.

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ix_fojT1-zM

          • Tiger
          • Tiger

            Basis for judicial interpretation

            In the United States, there are different ways to do judicial interpretation:

            Balancing happens when judges weigh one set of interests or rights against an opposing set, typically used to make rulings in First Amendment cases. For example, cases involving freedom of speech
            sometimes require justices to make a distinction between legally
            permissible speech and speech that can be restricted or banned for, say,
            reasons of safety, and the task then is for justices to balance these
            conflicting claims. The balancing approach was criticized by Supreme
            Court justice Felix Frankfurter who argued that the Constitution gives no guidance about how to weigh or measure divergent interests.[1]

            Doctrinalism considers how various parts of the Constitution have
            been “shaped by the Court’s own jurisprudence”, according to Finn.[1]

            Functionalism.[citation needed]

            Founders’ Intent involves judges trying to gauge the
            intentions of the authors of the Constitution. Problems can arise when
            judges try to determine which particular Founders or Framers to consult,
            as well as trying to determine what they meant based on often sparse
            and incomplete documentation.[1]

            Originalism involves judges trying to apply the “original” meanings of different constitutional provisions.[1] For example, former Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia believed that the text of the constitution should mean the same thing today as it did when it was written. A report in the Washington Post
            suggested that originalism was the “view that the Constitution should
            be interpreted in accordance with its original meaning — that is, the
            meaning it had at the time of its enactment.”[2]

            Prudentialism discourages judges from setting broad rules for possible future cases, and advises courts to play a limited role.[1]

            Precedent is judges deciding a case by looking to the decision of a previous and similar case according to the legal principle of stare decisis, by finding a rule or principle in an earlier case to guide their judgment in a current case.[1]

            Strict constructionism
            involves judges interpreting the text only as it was written; once a
            clear meaning has been established, there is no need for further
            analysis, based on this way, which advocates that judges should avoid
            drawing inferences from previous statutes or the constitution and
            instead focus on exactly what was written.[3] For example, Justice Hugo Black argued that the First Amendment’s wording in reference to certain civil rights that Congress shall make no law should mean exactly that: no law, no exceptions.

            Structuralism
            is a way judges use by searching for the meaning of a particular
            constitutional principle only by “reading it against the larger
            constitutional document or context,” according to Finn.[1] Judges try to understand how a particular ruling fits within the larger structure of the entire constitution.

            Textualism primarily interprets the law based on the ordinary meaning of the legal text.

          • Tiger

            Now read carefully in this particular case the law I gave you was simple, explicit and required NO other interpretations and was the right of the president by Proclamation to do what he is doing. Also the Constitution is plain and simple these judges played politics and emotions and were all about what they want and not the law.

            Strict constructionism
            involves judges interpreting the text only as it was written; once a
            clear meaning has been established, there is no need for further
            analysis, based on this way, which advocates that judges should avoid
            drawing inferences from previous statutes or the constitution and
            instead
            focus on exactly what was written.[3] For example, Justice Hugo Black
            argued that the First Amendment’s wording in reference to certain civil
            rights that Congress shall make no law should mean exactly that: no law,
            no exceptions.

          • Morton99

            Tiger when you have spent 4 years in law school as have I – the ignorant arrogance and contempt you seem to have for the judiciary may well disappear. Fortunately US jurisprudence can withstand any kind of attempted power grab because most Americans believe in the separation of power and democracy.

          • Tiger

            Oh now you spent 4 years in law school well you surely should know then that this is all above law and what kind of law? Yes most do see and understand a Power Grab and we understood it and that is why Trump is president.

            You could be studying any kind of law and you don’t get respect because you go to law school. I have two degrees myself and too theology and law as Electives. So what.

          • Tiger

            Ignorance was nowhere in any of my posts. Matter of fact sources explaining the laws Trump used were in my post yet no sources in your posts showing me wrong or how Trump is doing wrong.

            Contempt you got it and here is a lesson for you, education does not smart make, many lawyers, judges are disrespected and do bad deeds daily twisting the law to do bad to people. Like these judges.

          • Tiger

            Constitution Check: Would a ban on all Muslims entering the U.S. be valid?

            December 17, 2015 by Lyle Denniston

            Share:

            inShare1

            Email

            Lyle
            Denniston, the National Constitution Center’s constitutional literacy
            adviser, looks at the scholarly debate over Donald Trump’s proposed
            Muslim ban and some possible court scenarios.

            THE STATEMENT AT ISSUE:

            “We are not talking about isolation. We’re talking about security.
            We’re not talking about religion. We’re talking about security….As far
            as people like in the migration, where they’re going, tens of thousands
            of people having cell phones with ISIS flags on them? I don’t think so.
            They’re not coming to this country. And if I’m president and if Obama
            has brought some to this country, they are leaving. They’re going.
            They’re gone.”

            – Answer by Presidential candidate Donald Trump to a question at
            the Republican candidates’ debate December 15 in Las Vegas, regarding
            his proposal to ban all Muslims from entering the United States as a
            security threat.

            WE CHECKED THE CONSTITUTION, AND…

            As a sovereign nation, the United States government has always had
            undoubted authority to decide who may enter the country, and the
            conditions for entry by those who seek it. It has long been understood
            that most of this power lies with Congress, under its authority to
            decide who may become a citizen and its power over foreign commerce. The
            president and the Executive Branch share some of this authority,
            through the power to manage foreign relations, globally and with
            individual nations.

            With the rise of the national security threat posed by global
            terrorism, most recently by the Islamic State (ISIS or ISIL), a
            political debate has arisen and intensified over immigration of people
            of Muslim faith. It has not always been a rational debate; often, it
            seems to be driven by pure emotions, especially a fear of people of a
            different religious preference.

            That anxiety gave rise, early on, to a movement to assure that the
            American Constitution would never be interpreted by the precepts of
            Sharia law, after the Supreme Court decided a series of constitutional
            cases by looking to the legal norms of other nations, a side effect of a
            nation operating increasingly in a richly diversified world.

            With the recent terrorists’ attacks in the streets of Paris and in a
            neighborhood service center in San Bernardino, Calif., both linked to
            the influence of ISIS, political rhetoric has taken on a distinct
            anti-Muslim tone. It is in this context that the idea has gained some
            political favor that there be a flat ban on entry into the U.S. by
            Muslims from anywhere in the world. That is, of course, most closely
            associated with embrace of that idea by presidential candidate Donald
            Trump. It is almost a certainty that it will be debated throughout
            next year’s presidential primary elections and the fall campaign.

            Immediately, this political argument led to a constitutional
            debate. Reputable legal scholars have taken directly opposite
            positions on the constitutionality of such a ban.

            Despite the recital by both sides of competing court precedents, the
            Supreme Court has never decided specifically whether a religious
            preference could be a valid basis for exclusion of all of those who
            follow a given faith. The closest the court ever came to that was in a
            series of decisions in the 1890s, upholding several federal laws aimed
            at excluding Chinese immigrants. Those amounted, collectively, to a flat
            ban aimed at an entire group of foreign nationals, based on their race
            (not their faith), and the sentiment behind the laws has since been
            understood as pure hysteria.

            Near the center of the current debate about a ban on Muslims is a 1972 decision, in the case of Kleindienst v. Mandel,
            upholding the Executive Branch’s refusal to allow a Belgian scholar who
            was an adherent of Marxist political philosophy to enter the U.S. to
            give a series of lectures.

            The decision split the court 6 to 3. It is obvious that the majority
            opinion is filled with expressions of judicial reluctance to
            second-guess an Executive Branch decision in this field. That part of
            the ruling has led some scholars to the confident conclusion that a flat
            ban on Muslims would now be upheld, without judicial interference.

            Scholars of the opposite view, however, have drawn encouragement from
            the fact that the court did not accept in that case an argument by the
            Executive Branch that such decisions were not open to review in the
            courts. And such scholars also note that the court majority accepted the
            decision to exclude Mandel on the explicit premise that the
            government’s reasons for doing so were “facially legitimate and bona
            fide.”

            That phrase does create a constitutional test for judging a sweeping
            ban on entry based upon a broad classification. Given that not all
            Muslims who entered the country would undoubtedly pose a discernible
            threat, a total ban might not satisfy judicial demands that the policy
            have some proper foundation in fact and experience and was not a mere
            cover for hysteria or xenophobia. In the modern era of sensitivity to
            human rights, such broad-based classifications are quite suspect.

            But who would have a right, or the opportunity, to challenge such a
            ban, assuming that it would be imposed? No one has a constitutional
            right to enter the country; that is clear. It probably would require,
            then, that some Muslims who had already entered the country as refugees –
            such as the thousands that the Obama administration has been admitting –
            could make a case that they have a personal stake in remaining, and the
            only reason for sending them away would be the discriminatory view of
            their religious faith. And perhaps some refugee service organization
            that has worked with Muslim refugees could come forward to speak for
            them in court.
            It does seem reasonably clear that, if a proper challenger could be
            found, the courts very likely would be open to hear their claim.

            Here is an argument concerning what Trump said in one speech. However; this argument doesn’t apply to what Trump did. With his temporary hold from these 7 countries it is clearly not a ban because there are 50 major Muslim counties in this world and that shows it is not a religious ban. The countries named, were named by Obama along with Congress and they remain a threat to us to this day due to being terrorist harboring and supporting countries.

            Now this is going to come to a head sooner than later, all over the world daily people are slaughtered by Jihad and many countries in Europe building walls, refusing to take them and throwing them out, deporting them. The world has a problem right now, and it is not with any religion but Islam.

          • Tiger

            President Donald J. Trump is the POTUS and he is going to secure our borders, stop illegal aliens from getting benefits, close Sanctuary cities, take out the criminal illegals, build a wall and he will stop the flood of refugees unfettered by Obama, from coming into our country without very serious questions asked them and those who are not citizens who are here now can and will be monitored and if you don’t like it I suggest, you go and live in a Muslim country or join ISIS.

            You people will be the death of us. You do know we had 30 attacks under Obama, we had 78 he wouldn’t allow to be told, we lost over 3,000 on 9/11, first immigrants to come here and kill us in mass, and they been killing us since 1972.
            http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/americanattacks.htm

            The power of the Executive Branch is vested in the President of the
            United States, who also acts as head of state and Commander-in-Chief of
            the armed forces. The President is responsible for implementing and
            enforcing the laws written by Congress and, to that end, appoints the
            heads of the federal agencies, including the Cabinet. The Vice President
            is also part of the Executive Branch, ready to assume the Presidency
            should the need arise.

            The Cabinet and independent federal agencies are responsible for the
            day-to-day enforcement and administration of federal laws. These
            departments and agencies have missions and responsibilities as widely
            divergent as those of the Department of Defense and the Environmental
            Protection Agency, the Social Security Administration and the Securities
            and Exchange Commission.

            Including members of the armed forces, the Executive Branch employs more than 4 million Americans.

            The President | The Vice President

            Executive Office of the President | The Cabinet

            The President

            The President is both the head of state and head of government of the
            United States of America, and Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces.

            Under Article II of the Constitution, the President is responsible for
            the execution and enforcement of the laws created by Congress. Fifteen
            executive departments — each led by an appointed member of the
            President’s Cabinet — carry out the day-to-day administration of the
            federal government. They are joined in this by other executive agencies
            such as the CIA and Environmental Protection Agency, the heads of which
            are not part of the Cabinet, but who are under the full authority of the
            President. The President also appoints the heads of more than 50
            independent federal commissions, such as the Federal Reserve Board or
            the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as federal judges,
            ambassadors, and other federal offices. The Executive Office of the
            President (EOP) consists of the immediate staff to the President, along
            with entities such as the Office of Management and Budget and the Office
            of the United States Trade Representative.

            The President has the power either to sign legislation into law or to
            veto bills enacted by Congress, although Congress may override a veto
            with a two-thirds vote of both houses. The Executive Branch conducts
            diplomacy with other nations, and the President has the power to
            negotiate and sign treaties, which also must be ratified by two-thirds
            of the Senate. The President can issue executive orders, which direct
            executive officers or clarify and further existing laws. The President
            also has unlimited power to extend pardons and clemencies for federal
            crimes, except in cases of impeachment.

            With these powers come several responsibilities, among them a
            constitutional requirement to “from time to time give to the Congress
            Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their
            Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient.”
            Although the President may fulfill this requirement in any way he or she
            chooses, Presidents have traditionally given a State of the Union
            address to a joint session of Congress each January (except in inaugural
            years) outlining their agenda for the coming year.

            The Constitution lists only three qualifications for the Presidency —
            the President must be 35 years of age, be a natural born citizen, and
            must have lived in the United States for at least 14 years. And though
            millions of Americans vote in a presidential election every four years,
            the President is not, in fact, directly elected by the people. Instead,
            on the first Tuesday in November of every fourth year, the people elect
            the members of the Electoral College. Apportioned by population to the
            50 states — one for each member of their congressional delegation (with
            the District of Columbia receiving 3 votes) — these Electors then cast
            the votes for President. There are currently 538 electors in the
            Electoral College.

            President Barack Obama is the 44th President of the United States. He
            is, however, only the 43rd person ever to serve as President; President
            Grover Cleveland served two nonconsecutive terms, and thus is recognized
            as both the 22nd and the 24th President. Today, the President is
            limited to two four-year terms, but until the 22nd Amendment to the
            Constitution, ratified in 1951, a President could serve an unlimited
            number of terms. Franklin Delano Roosevelt was elected President four
            times, serving from 1932 until his death in 1945; he is the only
            President ever to have served more than two terms.

            By tradition, the President and the First Family live in the White
            House in Washington, D.C., also the location of the President’s Oval
            Office and the offices of the his senior staff. When the President
            travels by plane, his aircraft is designated Air Force One; he may also
            use a Marine Corps helicopter, known as Marine One while the President
            is on board. For ground travel, the President uses an armored
            Presidential limousine.

          • Morton99

            But that is impossible for Trump – after all he is only a ‘so called’ president. And apparently suffering from severe Narcissist Syndrome Disorder and mortified that people will discover that he is the most unpopular man holding that position in history.

          • Tiger

            While in law school did you study the Patriot Papers? Did you read what each branch of government is to do? Did you understand the Separation of Powers and that the Judiciary was to be the weakest? Well from the mouth of Thomas Jefferson to your ears, what should happen to judges who decide to take over the Executive Branch and put the American people and our Republic in danger and this is what Trump and the AG should do immediately to these judges remove them from the bench.

            29.7 Undermining Republican Government

            “At the establishment of our Constitutions, the judiciary bodies were supposed to
            be the most helpless and harmless members of the government. Experience, however, soon
            showed in what way they were to become the most dangerous; that the insufficiency of the
            means provided for their removal gave them a freehold and irresponsibility in office; that
            their decisions, seeming to concern individual suitors only, pass silent and unheeded by
            the public at large; that these decisions nevertheless become law by precedent, sapping by
            little and little the foundations of the Constitution and working its change by
            construction before any one has perceived that that invisible and helpless worm has been
            busily employed in consuming its substance. In truth, man is not made to be trusted for
            life if secured against all liability to account.” –Thomas Jefferson to A. Coray,
            1823. ME 15:486

            “This member of the government… has proved that the power of declaring what the
            law is, ad libitum, by sapping and mining, slyly, and without alarm, the
            foundations of the Constitution, can do what open force would not dare to attempt.”
            –Thomas Jefferson to Edward Livingston, 1825. ME 16:114

            “I do not charge the judges with wilful and ill-intentioned error; but honest
            error must be arrested where its toleration leads to public ruin. As for the safety of
            society, we commit honest maniacs to Bedlam; so judges should be withdrawn from their
            bench whose erroneous biases are leading us to dissolution. It may, indeed, injure them in
            fame or in fortune; but it saves the republic, which is the first and supreme law.”
            –Thomas Jefferson: Autobiography, 1821. ME 1:122

            “If, indeed, a judge goes against the law so grossly, so palpably, as no imputable
            degree of folly can account for, and nothing but corruption, malice or wilful wrong can
            explain, and especially if circumstances prove such motives, he may be punished for the
            corruption, the malice, the wilful wrong; but not for the error: nor is he liable to
            action by the party grieved. And our form of government constituting its respective
            functionaries judges of the law which is to guide their decisions, places all within the
            same reason, under the safeguard of the same rule.” –Thomas Jefferson: Batture at
            New Orleans, 1812. ME 18:130

            “One single object… [will merit] the endless gratitude of society: that of
            restraining the judges from usurping legislation. And with no body of men is this
            restraint more wanting than with the judges of what is commonly called our General
            Government, but what I call our foreign department.” –Thomas Jefferson to Edward
            Livingston, 1825. ME 16:113

          • Tiger

            Work>

            Job Interviews>

            Conducting Interviews

            What Is the Code of Conduct for United States Judges? by Stephanie Reid

            Related Articles

            [Judges] How Do Judges Lose Their Jobs?

            [Federal Magistrate] Salary for a Federal Magistrate

            [Federal Judge] Qualifications to Become a Federal Judge

            [Job Description] Job Description of a Judge

            [Steps] Steps to Become a Judge

            U.S.
            judges are governed by the Code of Conduct for United States judges.
            This document contains five canons relating to a judge’s judicial and
            personal conduct. It was adopted in 1973 and has been updated several
            times. The code applies to U.S. circuit judges, district judges, Court
            of International Trade judges, Court of Federal Claims judges,
            bankruptcy judges, and magistrate judges.

            Ads by Google

            Public Records-Search Now1, Enter a Name. 1, Select a State! Reveal Public Records Instantly.instantcheckmate.com​/​PublicRecords

            Integrity and Independence

            Canon
            1 of the code of conduct requires judges to be independent and unbiased
            in issuing decisions while still following the law. Judges must
            maintain the highest standards of personal conduct and practice
            integrity in every aspect of judicial practice. The crux of the first
            canon is to encourage public confidence in the judiciary and advance
            impartial rulings. The Code of Conduct is never to be interpreted in a
            way that impinges on a judge’s independence in deciding cases.

            Impropriety

            Judges
            must not only avoid impropriety, but the appearance of impropriety.
            Canon 2 requires a judge to avoid any situation in which his honesty,
            integrity, impartiality, temperament, or fitness to serve as a judge is
            impaired. Judges cannot allow outside family, social, political or
            financial influences to affect decision-making. A judge cannot belong to
            any group that promotes discrimination on the base of race, sex,
            national origin or religion.

            Fairness, Impartiality and Diligence

            Canon
            3 states that judges must decide cases without fear of criticism or
            public clamor. Judges must practice patience, dignity and respect toward
            all litigants, jurors, witnesses and lawyers. Judges are not permitted
            to make comments about a pending case to the media, and they have a duty
            to manage judicial business efficiently. If a judge cannot preside over
            a case without the appearance of impropriety, he must disqualify
            himself and refer the case to another judge.

            Extra-Judicial Activities

            Under
            Canon 4, judges are permitted, and encouraged, to participate in
            charitable, educational, religious, social, financial, fiduciary, and
            governmental activities. Judges may speak, write, lecture, and teach on
            both law-related and nonlegal subjects. However, canon four prohibits a
            judge from participating in any activities that give an appearance of
            bias or impropriety. A judge cannot exploit his judicial position in
            financial decisions or investments. Judges may act as trustees,
            fiduciaries or members of a board of directors, provided the position
            does not create an appearance of impropriety.

            Political Activity

            Canon
            5 prohibits judges from acting as a leader in any political
            organization. Judges are not permitted to endorse any candidate for
            office, make speeches for any political organization or solicit funds
            for political parties. If a federal judge becomes a candidate for a
            political office, he should resign the judgeship immediately.

            Ads by Google

          • Morton99

            Is that really your resume ? Looks like you plagiarized Scalia; you do know that he is shoveling cola right now ?

          • Tiger

            I gave you an article no wonder you are so dumb. The article is an argument you need to read and understand.

          • Tiger

            You have been living under a lawless man, Obama for so long you honestly believe we have open borders, everybody in the world has the right to come here, our Founding Fathers wrote the Bill of Rights, Constitution and Declaration of Independence for the world and we have no laws.

            As to Sanctuary cities take a look at our immigration laws, the Mayors of these cities committing a felony punishable by 10 years in prison and by George somebody will be made an example I elect Emanuel and Blahblah of N.Y.

            U.S. Attorneys » Resources » U.S. Attorneys’ Manual » Criminal Resource Manual » CRM 1500-1999 » Criminal Resource Manual 1901-1999

            1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) Offenses

            Title
            8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to
            aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic
            transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring
            unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to
            enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and
            abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits
            bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States
            in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry.
            Subsection 1324(a)(3).

            Alien Smuggling — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) makes it an offense
            for any person who — knowing that a person is an alien, to bring to or
            attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such
            person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other
            than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien
            has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside
            in the United States and regardless of any future official action which
            may be taken with respect to such alien.

            Domestic Transporting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) makes it an
            offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the
            fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States
            in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or
            move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or
            otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law.

            Harboring — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for
            any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an
            alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation
            of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to
            conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place,
            including any building or any means of transportation.

            Encouraging/Inducing — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an
            offense for any person who — encourages or induces an alien to come to,
            enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard
            of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in
            violation of law.

            Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)
            expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid
            or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.

            Bringing Aliens to the United States — Subsection 1324(a)(2) makes
            it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of
            the fact that an alien has not received prior authorization to come to,
            enter, or reside in the United States, to bring to or attempts to bring
            to the United States in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of
            any official action which may later be taken with respect to such
            alien.

            The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act
            (IIRIRA), enacted on September 30, 1996, added a new 8 U.S.C. §
            1324(a)(3)(A) which makes it an offense for any person, during any
            12-month period, to knowingly hire at least 10 individuals with actual
            knowledge that these individuals are unauthorized aliens. See this Manual at 1908 (unlawful employment of aliens).

            Unit of Prosecution — With regard to offenses defined in subsections
            1324(a)(1)(A)(i)-(v), (alien smuggling, domestic transporting,
            harboring, encouraging/inducing, or conspiracy/aiding or abetting) each
            alien with respect to whom a violation occurs constitutes a unit of
            prosecution. Prior to enactment of the IIRIRA, the unit of prosecution
            for violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) was each transaction, regardless
            of the number of aliens involved. However, the unit of prosecution is
            now based on each alien in respect to whom a violation occurs.

            Knowledge — Prosecutions for alien smuggling, 8 U.S.C. §
            1324(a)(1)(A)(i) require proof that defendant knew that the person
            brought to the United States was an alien. With regard to the other
            violations in 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a), proof of knowledge or reckless
            disregard of alienage is sufficient.

            Penalties — The basic statutory maximum penalty for violating 8
            U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(i) and (v)(I) (alien smuggling and conspiracy) is a
            fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both.
            With regard to violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(ii)-(iv) and (v)(ii),
            domestic transportation, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or
            aiding/abetting, the basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5
            years, unless the offense was committed for commercial advantage or
            private financial gain, in which case the maximum term of imprisonment
            is 10 years. In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided
            for in violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) involving serious bodily
            injury or placing life in jeopardy. Moreover, if the violation results
            in the death of any person, the defendant may be punished by death or by
            imprisonment for any term of years. The basic penalty for a violation
            of subsection 1324(a)(2) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not
            more than one year, or both, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(A). Enhanced
            penalties are provided for violations involving bringing in criminal
            aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i), offenses done for commercial
            advantage or private financial gain, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and
            violations where the alien is not presented to an immigration officer
            immediately upon arrival, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). A mandatory
            minimum three year term of imprisonment applies to first or second
            violations of § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i) or (B)(ii). Further enhanced punishment
            is provided for third or subsequent offenses.

            COMMENT: Further discussion of offenses defined in 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a) is set forth in Chapter 3 of Immigration Law, published as part of the Office of Legal Education’s Litigation Series, and as part of the USABook computer library.

  • John Williams

    Of course the 9th Circuit (AKA the 9th Circus) court will block, if you look at the track record of this bunch of activist liberal fools, you will see that somewhere around 80% of their rulings are overturned, this is nothing more than a delaying tactic that will be overturned. Trump and every other President before him has had the power to do this, it has been done by both democrat and GOP Presidents. At issue this time has nothing to do with what Trump is doing and everything to do with WHO is doing it. Remember these are the same countries singled out by the obama regime and you never heard a word.

  • DSR

    It is time to get the 2nd amendment going with our militia up and running. It seems the military doesn’t seem to have a set of balls to do anything.

    • RsGoat

      This is not a military issue it is a court issue. Countries that resort to military take overs of their government to solve their problems look like Mogadishu where no one is safe or has any thing. Those that have something it is crap! Look at the neighborhood in Blackhawk down. If you want to live like that keep talking but I like my world and will keep using the system to make change even if it is slow. It took decades for people who listened to the likes of Saul Alinsky to mess up this place by twisting up our education system and it will take a long time to fix it by hammering at the same system but it can be done without blowing up the whole place. Pull the round item from the vacuumous cavern and put it back between your shoulders where it dose the most good. A loud popping sound should indicate your off to a good start as it leaves that lower chamber!

      • Morton99

        A welcome breath of commonsense from you even though I suspect we might not agree on much of hard nosed politics. But I welcome sanity in any form.

        • RsGoat

          Thank You Morton, sorry about the Popping comment but I am colorful in my derogatory comments when I make them. I used that with my kids years ago too so now all I have to ask is if they heard a popping noise? One was at Navy basic training and wrote complaining about how difficult it was, no one was getting along she couldn’t do anything right…… I wrote her back and explained that I told her that is what it would be like for a week or two so settle down take a breath, don’t worry too much and write me back when you hear the pop. two or three weeks latter she wrote saying “I heard the pop dad” and things were a lot better. She was starting to have fun in basic training and making friends with the girls who were also learning to work together and not complain so much! Truthfully, I died when she used my words back at me It has been reused between us. I use to call it meditation, once I heard the pop I was done meditating. No one is immune!

        • Papa Bear

          Sanity in any form is always a good thing! :-)

  • Morton99

    The 9th circuit is NOT determining the constitutionality of Trump’s executive order, but whether or not there is reasonable likelihood of a constitutional issue. There obviously is – from a consideration of the Establishment Clause , and at least two Congressional Acts. The temptation to try and determine such a complex issue in the court of public opinion in fact tends to weaken Trump’s argument by making it political.

    • America1st

      The Washington state AG argument contends that immigrants face “financial hardship” due to Trump’s EO for a 90/120 day immigration suspension from these 7 countries that essentially have no central government and thereby ability to provide accurate vetting.

      The 1952 Imigration act expressly authorizes the President to determine who can and can’t enter the country without regard to whatever criteria to President chooses to use. Should this be elevated to the Supreme Court, Article 2 of the Constitution and the 1952 Imigration act will uphold Trump’s EO.

      • Morton99

        And the 1965 law restricts that ability. In all cases the INTENT of the President becomes a legitimate question for the Justices because it may be used to make the entire order unconstitutional by being in violation of the Establishment clause. Trump railed about Muslims and explicitly declared to ban them for 18 months during his election campaign, and even asked Giuliani how to make this wish legal. This is intent and goes to the heart of the argument that the order is illegal on a prima facie review of the Constitution. Finally he must prove a clear and present danger that goes beyond the normal extraordinary security that is already in place – which in other words is real evidence of an actual conspiracy for terrorism that would need these extra measures.

        We have a president – not a dictator who is beyond accountability.

        • Libs R Loons

          You obviously either failed law school, or failed to attend.

  • RsGoat

    The 1952 law was sponsored by two Democrats and gave Presidents the power to make these decisions but what sickens me is how people get all up in arms about the exemption for Christian’s knowing that they won’t deny their faith and for that they will be shot or beheaded. ISIS and other groups have been gracious enough to provide the documentation so we don’t have any need to question whether or not this abuse is happening! If we don’t allow this religious group to leave those countries we are doing the moral equivalent of trapping those of the Jewish faith with in the German boarder’s with the full knowledge they will be sent to Auschwitz! It makes me sick that a Federal Judge or any college journalist educated by our institutions of higher learning can not make these connections! The countries that were chosen are ones that have the highest incident of terrorist activity with in their boarders and our intelligence, that of the Obama administration identified them as the countries we needed to worry about the most! The longer these restrictions are held in check by our judiciary the better the opportunity for members of sleeper cells to gain entry into our country and begin acquiring target information and laying in plans for future opportunities. They won’t act for a long time to disassociate their activity from this time but they will use the opening that we give them to come on in!

  • Evan

    Trump should do exactly what obama did: IGNORE THE COURT DECISION!

    • Papa Bear

      I could only IMAGINE the uproar by the “establishment types” and the left that would follow any action like that :-) lol

    • Morton99

      I agree. It would at last give a prima facie case to impeach him.

      • Libs R Loons

        The courts have no legal standing in this situation.

  • Anthony Manzo

    I Wonder if these so called judges are man enough to take the responsibility of any crimes committed by any of the refuges that come in. Can they be charged as accessories. But for sure if any commit murder the BLOOD is on their hands. But than they have no conscience they will hide behind the law as they interpret it. We need EXTREME vetting for judges and POLITICIANS.

  • Papa Bear

    The point that no one is discussing is the element of surprise in your actions against the enemy. The “establishment types” we’ll call them, insisted that notice be given of the ban and everyone who has ever had to actually fight an enemy knows is that tactic is a recipe for disaster and defeat. How would that have worked if we had told Japan “Hey, we’re going to blow Hiroshima and Nagasaki off the face of the earth on such and such a days and we just wanted to give you a heads up”? ALL of the great battles of the past were won only with the best tactical use of the element of surprise. You will NEVER win a war or even a battle if you tell the enemy what you are going to do ahead of time!!

    The actions of the 9th District are doing just that. The “establishment types” are acting the way they are because they know that there are no consequences for what they are doing. Just like the Politician from California that stated that half of his family would be eligible for deportation under the new rules … WHY THE HELL hasn’t he been escorted away and locked up for various felonies involving immigration laws … just saying :-)

  • J.B.Jacobs

    I understand that people from these 7 countries listed in the Exective order are pouring into this country, trying to get in before that idiot Washington judge’s ruling is thrown out and Trumps order goes back into effect. What happens if one of these people commits a terrorism attack and kills some American people? Will the judge be held accountable as an accessary to murder. He should be. Trump’s people should have ignored the judges order, it wasn’t legal to start with. The left is crying in their beer about the people being held up when the Exective order was first enacted, how many people will be in the same situation when it is put into effect again. Probably more than the first time.

  • Eleanore Whitaker

    FACT: 6 countries NOT include in Trumps asshole ban ARE MUSLIIM COUNTRIES, at least 4 of whom gave us the 9/11 Terrorists. FACT: Trump opens his cow ass sized mouth to judges when his own sister is a So Called Judge. FACT: Trumps’ own words ALWAYS sink this control freak SOB. FACT: all he has is 40% supporter and even that is dropping. FACT: He is aligning himself so closely with PUTIN that it is now under investigation as to just how he and Putin are linked. FACT: His daughter Ivanka got her “collection” boycotted by Nordstrom and Trump whined like a little boy with his balls in a bunch. waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah

    • Papa Bear

      I agree that the order perhaps should have covered a broader range of Countries to TEMPORARILY ban, exactly in line with what the original Order stated until we can figure out how best to vet people from such Countries BEFORE we let them into our Country.

      The rest of your comment is your usual liberal ranting Eleanore so we will just ignore that. Have a good day!! :-) lmao

      • Eleanore Whitaker

        As an American when I read the First Amendment and it states, “Congress shall make NO law RESPECTING the establishment of religion, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF. What the hell does that mean to you?

        The next time you get a ticket for a traffic violation, make sure you demoralize the judge about the handle your case and see if he goes easy on you.

        The fact is that Mary Ann Trump, his sister, is a SO CALLED Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Judge. How much influence she has had over the courts in the past won’t get her anywhere with Constitutional law. She can appeal to the Supreme Court. But, with his cow ass sized mouth going full blast at the Judiciary System, who have eons of legal experience to is zero, no one on the Supreme Court is going to kiss Trump ass just because his name is Trump.

        The rest of your post is the usual CONman White Male BS.

        • Papa Bear

          And just what makes you think I am white? Are no one of any other color allowed to have a common sense opinion in your book? You are just as bigoted in your thoughts as you accuse everyone else of being!!! :-) lol

          • Libs R Loons

            Just flag that troll’s comments…s/he’s being paid 10 cents per comment by George Soros for posting liberal filth.

          • Papa Bear

            I know that. I just like messing with her and her kind. I think I may have hurt her feelings though because she hasn’t made a comment back … yet. :-) lol

    • bttrap

      you can’t pick on trump so you go after his family boy are you people crude and mean you should have your mouth washed out with soap

      • Papa Bear

        They tried but the soap escaped, headed for the hills and is still in hiding :-) lol

      • Eleanore Whitaker

        You bet I do. Remember when you shitballs bitched because First Lady Michelle Obama wore a sleeveless dress? Remember when you assfukkers all called Malia and Sasha the most vile names. Ifukka has no business using her father’s title to make millions in profit. Sorry…if Sasha or Malia had done that you dicklickers would have done your best reputation smearing. Get thee to a confessional phony.

        YOu love to dish it out but now that we are on the warpath and taking your and your Putin dicklicker to the toilet, you can’t handle it. Get used to it.

        We know a rigged election when we see it. It isn’t the first time Republican swaggering, drawling KKK CONfederates rigged an election but guaranteed…It will be the LAST.

    • Barney Biggs

      Wow I am not an American and have no horse in your race but lady you are over the top and really need to take your meds and go to bed.
      Disagreements are one thing but you are out of line

      • Eleanore Whitaker

        Mr. MAN translation: “No need for female opinions. Just be a good little girl and obey Mr. MAN’s EVERY command.” Sorry..not on my tax dollars. Of course now should you males with the 5 hour Viagra erections decide that women are not necessary to your bully boy strategies, we could just withdraw every dime we pay in taxes and let you MEN play Head of Household and Father Knows Best. Dream oh Mr. Testosterone.

        • Papa Bear

          Gee, you sure are on a tirade today Eleanore. No one said ANYTHING about ANYONE bowing down to ANYBODY!! Go take your meds and get some rest. :-) lol

  • disqus_tKlEuAw2uq

    DO AWAY WITH THE OFFICE HE IS IN, THAT IS LEGAL AND PUT THIS NUT CASE OUT OF WORK

    • Papa Bear

      Just to be clear here, you ARE talking about the Judge, right? :-) lol

  • daveveselenak

    REVOLUTION will be the SOLUTION – you are a fool to think otherwise; communists never cede power peacefully!

  • David in MA

    And there is this law:

    § § U.S. Attorneys » Resources » U.S. Attorneys’ Manual » Criminal Resource Manual » CRM 1500-1999 » Criminal Resource Manual 1901-1999

    1907. Title 8, U.S.C. 1324(a) Offense

    Title
    8, U.S.C. § 1324(a) defines several distinct offenses related to
    aliens. Subsection 1324(a)(1)(i)-(v) prohibits alien smuggling, domestic
    transportation of unauthorized aliens, concealing or harboring
    unauthorized aliens, encouraging or inducing unauthorized aliens to
    enter the United States, and engaging in a conspiracy or aiding and
    abetting any of the preceding acts. Subsection 1324(a)(2) prohibits
    bringing or attempting to bring unauthorized aliens to the United States
    in any manner whatsoever, even at a designated port of entry.
    Subsection 1324(a)(3).

    Alien Smuggling — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(i) makes it an offense
    for any person who — knowing that a person is an alien, to bring to or
    attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such
    person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other
    than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien
    has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside
    in the United States and regardless of any future official action which
    may be taken with respect to such alien.

    Domestic Transporting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) makes it an
    offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the
    fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States
    in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or
    move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or
    otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law.

    Harboring — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) makes it an offense for
    any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an
    alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation
    of law, conceals harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to
    conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place,
    including any building or any means of transportation.

    Encouraging/Inducing — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) makes it an
    offense for any person who — encourages or induces an alien to come to,
    enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard
    of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in
    violation of law.

    Conspiracy/Aiding or Abetting — Subsection 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)
    expressly makes it an offense to engage in a conspiracy to commit or aid
    or abet the commission of the foregoing offenses.

    Bringing Aliens to the United States — Subsection 1324(a)(2) makes
    it an offense for any person who — knowing or in reckless disregard of
    the fact that an alien has not received prior authorization to come to,
    enter, or reside in the United States, to bring to or attempts to bring
    to the United States in any manner whatsoever, such alien, regardless of
    any official action which may later be taken with respect to such
    alien.

    The Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act
    (IIRIRA), enacted on September 30, 1996, added a new 8 U.S.C. §
    1324(a)(3)(A) which makes it an offense for any person, during any
    12-month period, to knowingly hire at least 10 individuals with actual
    knowledge that these individuals are unauthorized aliens. See this Manual at 1908 (unlawful employment of aliens).

    Unit of Prosecution — With regard to offenses defined in subsections
    1324(a)(1)(A)(i)-(v), (alien smuggling, domestic transporting,
    harboring, encouraging/inducing, or conspiracy/aiding or abetting) each
    alien with respect to whom a violation occurs constitutes a unit of
    prosecution. Prior to enactment of the IIRIRA, the unit of prosecution
    for violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2) was each transaction, regardless
    of the number of aliens involved. However, the unit of prosecution is
    now based on each alien in respect to whom a violation occurs.

    Knowledge — Prosecutions for alien smuggling, 8 U.S.C. §
    1324(a)(1)(A)(i) require proof that defendant knew that the person
    brought to the United States was an alien. With regard to the other
    violations in 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a), proof of knowledge or reckless
    disregard of alienage is sufficient.

    Penalties — The basic statutory maximum penalty for violating 8
    U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(i) and (v)(I) (alien smuggling and conspiracy) is a
    fine under title 18, imprisonment for not more than 10 years, or both.
    With regard to violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(ii)-(iv) and (v)(ii),
    domestic transportation, harboring, encouraging/inducing, or
    aiding/abetting, the basic statutory maximum term of imprisonment is 5
    years, unless the offense was committed for commercial advantage or
    private financial gain, in which case the maximum term of imprisonment
    is 10 years. In addition, significant enhanced penalties are provided
    for in violations of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1) involving serious bodily
    injury or placing life in jeopardy. Moreover, if the violation results
    in the death of any person, the defendant may be punished by death or by
    imprisonment for any term of years. The basic penalty for a violation
    of subsection 1324(a)(2) is a fine under title 18, imprisonment for not
    more than one year, or both, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(A). Enhanced
    penalties are provided for violations involving bringing in criminal
    aliens, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i), offenses done for commercial
    advantage or private financial gain, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(ii), and
    violations where the alien is not presented to an immigration officer
    immediately upon arrival, 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(2)(B)(iii). A mandatory
    minimum three year term of imprisonment applies to first or second
    violations of § 1324(a)(2)(B)(i) or (B)(ii). Further enhanced punishment
    is provided for third or subsequent offenses.

    • Papa Bear

      And look at the crap President Trump is getting just for TEMPORARILY banning entry from a few Countries until we can figure out how best vet people coming in from those Countries. Could you imagine the uproar if he REALLY got nasty about enforcement of all of those Statutes?

      Just goes to show how political the system has become when Statues like this are totally ignored with no fear of consequences or accountability. :-( So sad!!!

  • Edgar Skinner

    Wonder how much money Soros paid the judge?

  • gerald Hughes

    Time to qit concerning ourselves with unnity and bipartisanship.
    Time to start beating the liberal dem bloodsucking scum unmercifully and unceasingly.

    • Katie Jones

      All we need to do if find out who are real lawyers who will follow the law for Trump can remove all judges and remove circuit courts – PERIOD.. Trust me he is not stupid which they think he is. He will go to the Supreme court and investigate them as well…

    • Libs R Loons

      I agree, and it’s wayyy PAST time we take off the kid gloves and quit coddling liberals.

  • Katie Jones

    Trump also has the right to disband circuit courts and remove judges. This is also true. For all the talk about the Constitution, there’s one thing the liberal media – and Judge Robart – fail to mention. And that’s the fact that people outside the United States do not have constitutional rights. PERIOD, as Mr. Spicer might say. The U.S. has always had the right to say who comes and who does not. This is beyond the pail for if the states can not stop people coming into their state and are not told how many refugees are coming, how do they have the right to decide what the UN decides which is ALLOWING THEM TO COME TO THIS COUNTRY IN THE FIRST PLACE. That is an agreed to function of the UN therefore the states do not have say at the UN only the Federal Government does??? This is turning the system up side down.in my opinion and the legal and lawful law. How can Federal Courts decide on people who are not here – 1 and are not citizens – 2. I don’t get this at all on why this is even legal. Remove the 9th circuit for they are just not lawyers anymore!!!

  • junkmailbin

    The judge would have done the same thing. He is a liberal progressive shill that is trying to destroy the legal system from within.
    The female on the triade made a complete fool out of herself with her questioning. Lets see how far afield we can get. the senile old guy was a complete moron. He kept asking speculation questions. They all decided to go way afield. What they were supposed to be judging was what was written on the order, not speculate about reasons.

  • Peatro Giorgio

    Clearly The Federal Burracracys are not the only cesspool swamps that are in need of dtastic drainage. We need also drain the Judicuary of all lunatic left liberal justices who believe they have the Authority to make laws from the bench. Empeachment an removal will not be sufficient. We need charge them with treasonous. Upon a finding of guilty execution is the nessasary remedy. These are my opinions & I’m standing by them.

    • mrpoohead

      Duh! Judiciary are there to interpret the law – their political opinion is irrelevant they cannot change a law, can they? Moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      Well after numerous months of drivel your opinions still remain the same – that of a fruit loop. Our guinea pig has more brain cells.

      • Libs R Loons

        I’m sure that your pet guinea pig is well-acquainted with the contours of your rectum.
        “Mrpoohead”….at least you’re well-named.

        • mrpoohead

          Mrpoohead has all the facts, unlike Pea-brain who has naught between his ears.

    • mrpoohead

      Judges interpret the law, they cannot change it. A guilty person is guilty; whether the judge is extreme right or left. Moron!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Katie Jones

    Just in case you all did not see this article.

    http://www.wnd.com/2017/02/25-year-state-dept-veteran-exposes-refugee-program-as-fraud/
    See why we need to stop for a while.

  • Walt

    President Donald J Trump drain the swamp and get rid of the Obama regime that are giving you trouble. Obama, Hillary, and others should be tried and put in jail for treason and sentenced to death. Start having attorneys attacking them now and shut the liberals up.

  • rridgsr

    This Judge was way out of bounds on his order and I am glad Trump had the Balls to say what he should have To start he does not have the information the White House has on safety Thought we was rid of these left wing nuts for a while then some Judge sticks his nose where it did not belong !!!

  • irene

    I AGREE! THIS JUDGE IS ON SOROS PAYROLL!

  • http://batman-news.com Jeffrey Cahoon

    When, if ever, is this BULL**** going to stop? If Trump has the sweeping power to accomplish this immigration thing, then he should do it, judges be dammed!

  • tCotUS

    Time we start weeding ourt these Judges…One way or another…

    • Papa Bear

      Surely, you are not inferring that being as how they have a lifetime appointment, that perhaps their lives should become unexpectedly shortened by such means as … well, you know? I don’t even think the Clintons could pull off or Johnson could have pulled off THAT many “accidents” and “suicides” :-) lmao

      • tCotUS

        Oh PaPa Bear …Of course Judge removal should be by Legal means. ,Why how else could it be? Even as Traitors to their Oath of Office, Traitors to the Constitution, & dirty rotten scoundrels to We the People.. How else could it be?

        • Papa Bear

          I guess that would depend on whom you were asking but I just wanted to be sure. Thought you may have been having a “Clinton” or “Soros” moment there for a moment and was concerned for your welfare :-) lmao

          • tCotUS

            Thanks PaPa…Lol…. I wonder what the clintons would do if word got out a few of those type judges are going to testify against them…….Just a thought…

          • Libs R Loons

            The Clintons would make sure those judges get “suicided” in short order.

          • Papa Bear

            You beat me to it Libs. And here I was bumming because I couldn’t be a fly on the wall the night she lost the election but being there to hear their reaction to that one
            would be sweet :-) lol

          • Libs R Loons

            LOL…I’m handing you the torch now…carry on! 😀

          • Libs R Loons

            I watched some youtube reports on how Hillary went ballistic behind closed doors when she lost, threw things around the room, screeched and blamed her staff, who didn’t dare bat an eye during her tirade.

  • leftbanker

    Just ask the Don to read (if he still can) the Constitution before he sends out his signed tweets – life would be much simpler for us all.

    • Libs R Loons

      If YOU had read the Constitution you’d know that those feeble filings have no legal leg to stand on. Trump is not only within his legal right to secure our borders, he’s REQUIRED to by the Constitution and the laws of the land.
      Just because Obama ignored both doesn’t mean they don’t exist.

  • Oldawg70

    This is war folks, so don’t expect it to be easy! Go Trump/Pence!

  • MARY MCCLURE

    Drain the swamp Trump NOW.

  • Gary

    The system has been infiltrated by Liberal Communists. A lot of these judges were appointed by Slick Willy during his reign. Time to clean house. Get these pigs out of power. What Trump is doing is right. Who are these judges to make decisions for the people. They DON’T have the right. By not following the Constitutional law, that makes them tyrants, traitors to the country, treason. They took an oath to uphold the Constitution and they break it, makes it treason. Trump can make a great difference with this country if left alone but the Demo-rats ant Liberal Left don’t want this. They have their own agenda which isn’t good for America, Socialism, dictatorship, complete control over the people, destruction of the economy(by letting more and more immigrants, illegals in only to have to take care of them with social services.) Costing this country BILLIONS Tried of having my pockets picked. Tired of watching immigrants checking out at grocery stores with carts full of groceries I CAN’T afford. They have a free ride at US tax payers expense.

  • http://WWW.SPIRITOFAMERICAPARTYRADIOSHOW.COM TOM P O’DONNELL

    two communist judges should be transferred to jobs that can’t hurt the country. something like pet family court.

    • Libs R Loons

      LOL…or the “family court” where they have to determine if 2 people who divorce can still belong to the same GANG.

    • Papa Bear

      Night Court would be more appropriate but I would never insult Judge Harry Stone like that :-) lol

  • Pyara Chauhan

    It will be the height of folly for the courts to try and overturn the constitutional and temporary ban on some immigrants trying to enter the USA as refugees from certain countries connected to terrorism.The ban is temporary, and, contrary to the hue and cry by the liberals, it applies to a minuscule minority of Muslims from a very few countries known to have connections to terrorism. Under no circumstances the ban will affect the vast majority of Muslims resident in the major Muslim countries like Indonesia, India, Pakistan etc. Let us hope good sense will prevail.

  • Bachelor With Sense

    Cut off the judge’s nose so he can spite his face, then feed the judge Robart to the Muslims he wants to bring into the USA!

    Since the judge is not a muslim, they will kill him since he could be against Sharia law.

  • Archie Cogollos

    This is Bullshit…not only does the Judge not know the law but he is ill informed about the facts…we need a special attorney to take this case for President Trump…one who is a Pittbull with lockjaw…it’s just a delay tactic….it has historical basis….i’m sure opinions will vary….

  • Dawn is here

    This judge should be the one who is fired/impeached he’s the IDIOT & can’t follow the law. LOCK that BUTThead up!!

  • astrc

    That, “So-called” JUDGE, (Which does not take a person with a “PhD”. or a “Rocket Scientist” , to see that he, “FAILED” , to live up to his, “Oath of Office”, (as a JUDGE), with the clear understanding of his “Legal Education”, that the, U.S. Constitution, is the “Supreme Law of the land”.. (AS “WRITTEN”) PERIOD..
    & HIS “Politically & INCORECT” statement that Pres. Trump’s, (Temporary Immigration Ban) Executive Order, would cause, “Irreparable Injury”, to the State of Washington, is just so much “Political B.S.”,(LOOK IT UP in the Dictionary), which clearly mean that he exceeded his authority as a, “So-Called” Judge. Pres. Trump called a “spade a Spade” , the TRUTH), WHAT’S so, “Demoralizing & Disheartening”, about telling the American people the TRUTH, “Senator Blumenthal”??? Does the “TRUTH” Hurt you “poor losing” Ego???

  • R. T.

    How can a district court have authority over the entire Country ?

    • Morton99

      Because you can’t have different alien entry laws in each State. Get it ?

      • R. T.

        HE OVER STEEPED HIS AUTHORITY !
        So if his district can’t have it’s own law he has no say in it , go’s directly to Supreme Court of US !
        He does not have the authority to speak for the entire Country !
        The President has last say as to who can come into the US !

      • R. T.

        How come , both Bush’s , Clinton , Obama , could do basically the SAME thing and nothing be said !

  • Joyce White

    Judge Robarts, like any other judge knows the law, and just how far he can push it. There is no way this man could believe that he could permanently stoop Trump’s ban. He has placed a stumbling block. When his is struck down, another judge will come up with a reason to challenge Trump’s authority. As far as I am concerned, any judge who pulls this kind of a stunt should be dis-barred. Any judge who can be bought, shouldn’t be on the bench.

    • Papa Bear

      What this Judge has done is give the enemy time to posture themselves and get ahead of the TEMPORARY ban. This Judge and his puppeteers know full well that President Trump had the power and more than that, the responsibility to do what he did. This Judge and his puppeteers just didn’t like it and decided to do whatever they could to block this president from responsibly and properly doing his job. But, that being said, you can bet your bottom dollar that should something really bad happen as a result of their blocking President Trump’s actions, it will all be President Trump’s fault.
      Unfortunately the “swamp” is much larger and spread out much farther than most people thought. :-( So sad!!

      • Libs R Loons

        On that note, I think that much of the democrat obstructionism is to buy time to run shredders and have emails deleted 24/7 before Trump’s appointees are sworn in and take office, especially at the DOJ.
        But no matter what those liberal judges file, no matter how much they yell, and no matter who they rile up, President Trump has every legal right and obligation to place a hold or an outright ban on anything and anyone he deems a threat to our borders.

        • Papa Bear

          I think you meant obstructionism but you are more than likely correct in your assessment. Perhaps the President should consider seizing all shredders in the government and shut down all electronic communications going out of the DOJ and institute a rule that no communication devices can enter or those that are there can not leave the premises until his people can get in there and really see what really has been going on. Now, THAT would be interesting to see :-) lol

          • Libs R Loons

            As much as I’m guessing that they need to shred to stay out of prison, it wouldn’t surprise me if they’re taking documents by the truckload to locations that have industrial-size shredders.

          • Papa Bear

            That wouldn’t surprise me at all!!

  • Junior1950

    Newly confirmed U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions needs to QUASH these ILLEGAL Court orders!!!!!!!!!

    • Morton99

      He needs more time to measure up hi Federal employees for their new sheet uniforms with pointy hats.

      • Libs R Loons

        Soros Troll Alert! ^^^

  • Libs R Loons

    I think that much of the democrat obstructionism (or “distractionism”?) is to buy time to run shredders and have emails deleted 24/7 before Trump’s appointees are sworn in and take office, especially at the DOJ.

    • Retired

      You got that part right.

      • Libs R Loons

        I know their tactics, from when a man at the state department happened to go by over the weekend and found some of his employees in the basement shredding boxes of documents that implicated Hillary and the “7th floor” where her top staffers worked.

        • Retired

          To bad there are no vids going around of that action.

          • Libs R Loons

            Here’s an article I copied and saved for posterity….read on.

            Hillary’s Benghazi Cover-Up Exposed

            Submitted by Donald R. May on Tue, 09/16/2014 – 1:38am

            It appears Hillary Clinton had her senior staff cover-up her misdeeds, and possibly the misdeeds of President Barack Obama, relating to the Benghazi assassination of a United States Ambassador and the murder of three other Americans.

            The nature of the revealed allegations is such that the dereliction of duty of President Obama during the Benghazi U.S. Consulate attack and the subsequent cover-up may be forthcoming.

            Sharyl Attkisson, an investigative reporter for The Daily Signal, posted this “bombshell” revelation on Monday.

            An operation was apparently observed in which Hillary Clinton’s Chief of Staff and Deputy Chief of Staff directed the removal of Benghazi related documents that would have implicated Clinton, and possibly Obama, in wrongdoing.

            In an interview Monday morning on Fox News, Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, named the two Hillary Clinton confidants who allegedly were present: One was Cheryl Mills, Clinton’s chief of staff and a former White House counsel who defended President Bill Clinton during his impeachment trial. The other, Chaffetz said, was Deputy Chief of Staff Jake Sullivan, who previously worked on Hillary Clinton’s and then Barack Obama’s presidential campaigns.

            Attkisson described the session in which the removal of documents allegedly took place,

            According to former Deputy Assistant Secretary Raymond Maxwell, the after-hours session took place over a weekend in a basement operations-type center at State Department headquarters in Washington, D.C. This is the first time Maxwell has publicly come forward with the story.

            At the time, Maxwell was a leader in the State Department’s Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, which was charged with collecting emails and documents relevant to the Benghazi probe.

            “I was not invited to that after-hours endeavor, but I heard about it and decided to check it out on a Sunday afternoon,” Maxwell says.

            He didn’t know it then, but Maxwell would ultimately become one of four State Department officials singled out for discipline—he says scapegoated—then later cleared for devastating security lapses leading up to the attacks. Four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, were murdered during the Benghazi attacks.

            Maxwell says the weekend document session was held in the basement of the State Department’s Foggy Bottom headquarters in a room underneath the “jogger’s entrance.” He describes it as a large space, outfitted with computers and big screen monitors, intended for emergency planning, and with small offices on the periphery.

            When he arrived, Maxwell says he observed boxes and stacks of documents. He says a State Department office director, whom Maxwell described as close to Clinton’s top advisers, was there. Though the office director technically worked for him, Maxwell says he wasn’t consulted about her weekend assignment.

            “She told me, ‘Ray, we are to go through these stacks and pull out anything that might put anybody in the [Near Eastern Affairs] front office or the seventh floor in a bad light,’” says Maxwell. He says “seventh floor” was State Department shorthand for then-Secretary of State Clinton and her principal advisers.

            “I asked her, ‘But isn’t that unethical?’ She responded, ‘Ray, those are our orders.’ ”

            The ongoing investigation by Representative Trey Gowdy will benefit from these revelations as it resumes this week. Gowdy’s methodical investigation is moving slowly and carefully. A Republican majority in the Senate next January will also be of good help with the Benghazi investigation.

            These revelations may make a big difference in the political futures of Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.

          • Retired

            That was a bigger cover up than Nixon.

          • Libs R Loons

            Indeed, the democrats make Nixon look like a Boy Scout, and they also make Al Capone look like a philanthropist.

  • flashy0ne

    Thank goodness we have a President who follows the Constitution when the “so called” impartial judges look for any reason the justify ignoring it. Just reflect on the “balance of powers” set up by our Constitution. The Congress passes a law, the Court is “supposed” to determine the constitutionality of the law and the President has the power to enforce the law. Just imagine what would happen if the President acted politically, like the current Washington court, and DIDN’T enforce a judicial decision. Total chaos would result! The current immigration crisis is an example: Obama REFUSED to enforce the immigration laws already on the books. The result — millions of illegal aliens with heart wrenching stories of children born in the US with parents being deported. Is Trump to blame — hardly — as President his DUTY is to enforce the law. The only viable solution to this dilemma is with the US Congress. They must amend the current immigration laws taking into account the present situation and making it possible for these immigrants to become citizens of the US. It would certainly help if the Mexican government would lend a hand to support Mexican citizens in the US.

    • Libs R Loons

      I agree, and we already saw what happened when Obama refused to follow the laws he didn’t like for 8 years, and appointed liberal judges to strategic courts initially to block all the 5,000+ lawsuits against him.

    • Morton99

      A simpler solution might just be to make extreme right wing Americans United Nations refugees, and give their places to decent hardworking Muslim immigrants. Humility and Christian values could then be restored and take their proper place in our culture.

      • Libs R Loons

        YOU have no business blathering about “Christian Values”, Sorosbot. ^^^

        • Morton99

          Listen I personally have no problem with your juvenile fear mongering or your atheistic mind set – but I intend to live a moral life – not being fond of shoveling coal in the pits of hell.

          • Libs R Loons

            LOL….don’t use big words like “moral life ” that you don’t understand, you being a gay-boy and all.
            And I may not be a very good Christian, but then I never claimed to be. I’ll slap you into next Tuesday in a heartbeat if you dared get in my face with your liberal spewage.

          • Morton99

            LOL I bet you have had a lot of practise with you witchy whip hand too. Be careful hussy or I might have to send a 3rd Reich leather clad dyke over to set you straight.

  • Betty

    are federal judges appointed or elected these are known as liberal judges what can be done of course the liberal west coast do not care about the safety of our country

    • Morton99

      Appointed for life.

      • Libs R Loons

        Doesn’t mean they can’t be charged.

        • Morton99

          They can be impeached – but that has almost never happened.
          Any way the ban on i mmigration stays. Tough luck

          • Libs R Loons

            It’s a HOLD on immigration, not a ban, and yeah- tough luck for you if you happen to have muslim terrorist kin, huh?
            Somebody should report you for practicing law without a license.

          • Morton99

            The ban stays in court means the ban remains stayed. Hope that helps.

          • Libs R Loons

            What a liberal wannabe-lawyer has to say doesn’t mean diddly. ^^^

          • Morton99

            That alright you old hag. I really could care less about whether or not you think I am a lawyer or just a wise liberal.

          • Libs R Loons

            You’re neither, and how DARE you talk about your marxist buddy Hillary like that!

          • Morton99

            weak – high school drop out were you ?

          • Libs R Loons

            Wishful thinking from a delusional moon-bat. ^^^

          • anibanib

            Typical ultra right wing brainwashed jerk reply, loosing the argument, resort to insults………and I like your photo you once published,out with a friend……nice teeth https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/507b39027f2867cb43a938912bd23f6c6d6a1238e4b45aec437dd8e2afc082cd.jpg

          • bttrap

            maybe a stupid punk that your mother should of practice birh control

          • bttrap

            there is still one more court and trump is holding his ace in the hole for this one

          • Morton99

            Nah. There’s no room for that ace in his hole – his head and shoulders are firmly wedged up there.

          • Morton99

            And it is a ban for varying periods according to a national or refugee categorization

          • bttrap

            it’s not over yet

  • BichonLover

    It looks like the Atty. Generals of WA. state and Minn, aren’t interested in keeping their citizens safe from the refugees! Maybe they’d feel better if one of them got hold of one of their daughters or sons and slaughtered them!!!!! What the hell is wrong with these Morons???? Trump is the only President that has American’s best interest at heart and they want to fight him at every turn!!!!!! The citizens of these states should remember this when these people come up for re-election!

    • bttrap

      I hope wa. and minn are the first states to get hit when there is an attact by issi and they hit the atty generals are first to get attacted

  • Amish Prepper

    All these Democrats and Judges and more are working for Soros and Obama and helping the elites with their agenda. We need to really drain the swamp, as it is filled with sewage!

  • Kika68

    the so called judge has no standing against Trumps executive order. Trump should have told him so and to mind his own business and continued on with the ban. He would not be waiting around now for an answer.

  • R. T.

    Not protecting or defending the CONSTITUTION !

  • Peter Pihun

    Why are these liberal judges from the left side of the country telling Trump and the voters what to do about protecting our borders. This is truly insane.

  • Morton99

    An important lesson to the so called president. He seems out of his depth and will now be in a losing war with the judiciary.

    • Libs R Loons

      No, the “judiciary” has no legal legs to stand on, moon-bat.

      • Morton99

        You go on thinking that you old sourpuss – you must really like humiliation. Go sob on your girlfriend’s arm.

        • Libs R Loons

          I can almost hear you saying “sourputh” and “thob”, little gayboy.
          At least you liberals are good for a laugh! ;-D

          • Morton99

            I think you are sexually deprived – you thoughts are so prurient. I am sure you scare those little feminine girls when you lunge at them. Make sure you check their age before you defile them.

          • Libs R Loons

            Ahhh….another liberal projecting his own sick fantasies.

          • Morton99

            It no laughing matter giving them rape counseling.

          • Libs R Loons

            Do YOU even know what you said, Achmed???

          • Morton99

            Are you having memory problems or is it some kind of early onset alzheimers ? The name is Morton and my comments are still viewable on this blog.

          • Libs R Loons

            The more you type, the more you prove that English is your second language….Achmed.

          • Morton99

            No Loony, all it shows is that there is a huge drop from my level of education to yours.

          • anibanib

            Hi there Morton99………..see you are having problems with the inbred natives…………I get replies like this all the time………..
            “”Libs R Loons
            Morton99 • 8 hours ago

            The more you type, the more you prove that English is your second language….Achmed “”

  • Libs R Loons

    The FBI needs to dig into those judges’ financials and review every unconstitutional decisions they made.
    I’m positive they’ll find just cause for impeachment.

  • proudV

    Why is nothing being done to stop these bastards?, Nothing thats what. It doesnt matter that Trump was voted into power in a landslide, These Judges do as they please and they are blocking the POTUS from the Constitutional right given to him to decide immigration matters. If the Supreme Court votes against our President?, Whats next?. I know that the Liberal bastards in this Nation think this is what they want, But eventually this Rioting, Protesting, Destruction of property must end and we the people have almost had enough. Quit acting like children because the days of disorder will end and you wont like it!!.

  • Morton99

    The so called president has virtually no support frim his own party for the humiliation he has incurred on himself. Incompetence and racism is not admired by anyone. And these a part of the ruling today pointed out the possibility of racism in the travel ban.
    This sham of a president needs to be slapped on the face on a daily basis.

    • bttrap

      and you should be a target for issi by the way are you a vet? did you stand up for the U.S. in viet nam I can’t belive I fought for your rights you are not worth it

      • Morton99

        My fight is for a democracy and freedom – not s so called president who wants to be a dictator. You should be ashamed of yourself. When did you first realize that you hated our system in the US ?.

        • bttrap

          when hitlery ran for president when was yours?

        • Libs R Loons

          You’re a bit late to be whining about Obama………

          • Morton99

            Oh boy, you really are confused. Stop it with your trips down memory lane – get it together lady.

          • Libs R Loons

            No, it appears that YOU are confused, because you feebly attempt to paint Obama-guilt onto President Trump.
            And if you really are about “freedom and democracy” you’re doing a crappy job with it.

          • Morton99

            Uh huh – you are tripping over yourself and your pride and resort to try and cleverly reassemble my words – so laboriously that I feel your pain.

  • Bill Sturdivant

    Now that the ninth circuit has sided , I think, politically against Donald Trumps temporary ban, every incident (damage, death, or injury) to people in the U. S. as a result of terriorism by immigrants coming into this country under this decision shall be the responsibility of those three judges and the lawyers and governors of the responsible states.

  • WhiteFalcon

    I have read the portion of that law where it says that the President at his discretion has the authority to limit or exclude immigration from any country based on any reason that he considers relevant. Clearly the court was wrong, as liberal institutions always are and that court is the most liberal in the country. That incorrect outcome was easily predictable. I hope that President Trump’s pick for the Supreme Court is confirmed ASAP so that this matter can be properly settled.

  • Bill Byrd

    All a person has to do is check out McCarron-Warren Act of 1952 to see the President has the authority to invoke a Travel ban in the interest of National Security. Just like Obama, Clinton, and Carter did during their time in office, oops! may because Trump ins’t a Dumbacrat is what the problem is.

  • DSR

    RsGoat – No I see a need to kill 25 to 45 million people. So I hope the Muslims do exactly what they said they will do. Take us over by force if needed. Because no one has the balls to get the militia up and going. As far as this between my shoudlers and a loud pop …, not me. As far as Mogadishu goes…, you need to take a good look at the inner city’s. We already have it.

  • DSR

    Muslims entry into this country should be based on 2 things.
    eating pork and converting to Christianity.

  • Dennis B Anderson

    I was watching that left wing fat @$$ Bob Beckel I think thats his last name? He was taken off the air over a year ago. He was on the FOX 5″ and he swore up and down all of America want the immigrants here.??
    Do you want to shoot this piece of meat or do you want me to?

  • SUZANNE M.

    THE JUDGES JUST GAVE THEIR BLESSING TO TERRORISTS………THE COUNTRIES IN QUESTION DO NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO VET THE PEOPLE COMING TO AMERICA….HELL THEY DON’T EVEN HAVE “GOVERNMENTS” WHEN TERROISM HITS US AGAIN AND IT MORE THAN LIKELY WILL, THIS WILL BE ON THEIR HEADS.

  • markypolo

    These worthless POS judges MUST be FIRED! Politics has NO place in the Judicial System! These A-Holes took an OATH to uphold the Constitutional Laws of the United States. They have failed.

  • GODBlessRealAmerica!
  • randi amundsen

    I was in NY on 9/11 I believe these liberal morons want another one. Not from the air this time. Liberals/Democrats the blood is on your hands should this happen again

  • Patricia Gleitz

    The judges involved in removing Mr. Trump’s ban really don’t care about the security of Our Country. They are only interested in stuffing their pockets with money. Forget about interpreting the law as the law is written.

  • randi amundsen

    And again I say rember 9/11 and the fact that Liberals and those looser Democrats want another go at it. If because of that order from that liberal judge we have another 9/11 the blood is on your hands. do not forget this.

  • http://www.dauntlessposst.com DouglasDauntless

    Every body is forgetting all the Senators run by Schummer, O’Connell and Ryan and Pelosi.They all bought and paid for by Soros and they deserve the same. Because with these people we would be living in a free country and not a New World Order Bush family Country and world!

  • FRED PENNINGTON

    People don’t know or study the our Declaration or the Constitution, in fact they aren’t taught in schools any more AND lawyers don’t learn how to interpret the Constitution before they graduate; while they are the ones who created the mess our country is in now. The Dakota Pipe line is a violation of the Indian Nation Treaties; but, big money Corporations and the U. S. Government don’t think laws apply to them. The only thing that counts is brain-washing the people with lies to support any action they want AND bury the limits of the Constitution on what the law allows: No one knows the Constitution says, NO WAR CAN BE FUNDED FOR MORE THAN 2 YEARS: So, our Congress calls war a POLICE ACTION, which fools only the ignorant. Make people full of fear and they will support anything — THAT IS THE TRUTH!!!!!!

  • Fuzzface

    “We need judges who will decide cases based on the text in evidence, and not on a candidate’s campaign-trail bluster.” This is more the reason why President Trump needs to drop his twitter account and learn to not let his winning attitude get the best of him.

  • GODBlessRealAmerica!
  • Gary Von Neida

    The Ninth Circuit Court has been a “hot bed” of New World Order” mouthpieces since I have watched in the 1980’s; what’s new? Anything anti-American They seem to support—-don’t believe it? Check the records, they read like A.C.L.U.’s representing anti- American, One World Socialism—-no borders: do You get it?

  • KKmoderate

    My chatroom colleagues we need to remember who started all of this open border and invasion of our country by foreigners. Ted Kennedy 1965. Google the story and the lies he told to get his legislation passed. The last and least of the Kennedy brothers and his awful legacy to our nation!

  • J.B.Jacobs

    If these idoit, so-called judges, have caused one death in this country because of what they did, they should be disbarred, and tried as a murderer. Trump had every right to do what he did. It was not about some poor old immigrant who was held up coming into this country, it was because Trump won the Presidency.

  • Labor74

    WHEN was the Mccarran-Walter Act (1952) rescinded???
    It has to do with the immigration of any/all aliens who, even through allying w/any group calling for the end of the US & its gov’t, can be & will be denied entry to the US.
    Where has the judiciary been these past 60+ years??

  • Rodzzz

    We knew all along the courts have no power to block the President’s order….those idiot judges either do not know the law or they are in Soros’ pocket. Get rid of those tyrants.

  • Richard Hennessy

    What’s not in error regarding the Ninth Circuit’s decision? Not much.

  • Jerry

    It is sad to see that our country has come down to these types of discussions.

  • desert fox

    The degradation of America was and is the goal for these liberal demoncrats. Check their moral values, their work ethics, their self-responsibility, their self-importance, and then top that with their greed. That is the picture of a demoralized humanity unable to cope with reality.

  • irene

    TO DRAIN THE SWAMP, WE HAVE TO START WITH THE BIGGEST MONSTER IN IT, “SOROS”!!

  • Obie Miller

    I believe that we all realize that the courts acted improperly, but we do not know of anything we can do about it!

  • survivor33

    I can’t believe any court can override the President. If this can happen why didn’t any of them override Ovomit and his plan to ruin America with all his illegal acts. I hope Trump does something about this illegal act. The courts are getting worse than the Senate to do what’s right and LAWFUL. As long we have Soros, Obomit & the Clintons (all 3 of them) we will have Chaos in our country. Time to put them all in jail for their crimes, especially and including the NAZI Soros who murdered all those Jews.

  • freeper

    Time to retire these judicial activist scum! They’ve been screwing the Constitution into pretzels in order to get their way. Time to close down the 9th Circus!

  • Cookie

    “Remember even Heaven has a WALL, a GATE, and there’s extreme vetting to get in.” ..copied

  • Cookie

    “OFA, formerly Obama for America, has trained more than 10,000 leftist organizers, who, in turn, are training more than 2 million youths in Alinsky street tactics. The leftist group, which recently registered as a 501c4 nonprofit eligible for unlimited contributions, holds regular “organizing summits” on college campuses……” WP

    • rocky

      Right… somehow the application for tax exempt status was almost immediately authorized.
      See how the processes have been speeded up by this administration ???
      (tongue in cheek)

  • Cookie

    An araticle in the Washington Post quotes Obama as saying:

    The 55-year-old Obama is not content to go quietly into the night like other ex-presidents.

    “You’re going to see me early next year,” he said after the election, “and we’re going to be in a position where we can start cooking up all kinds of great stuff.”

    Added the ex-president: “Point is, I’m still fired up and ready to go.”

  • Cookie

    There is an email going around that says “Medals in two wars gets $1200 a month; Middle East refugees gets $1700 a month.” Someone needs to take a look at this.

  • Beth Heilman

    These judges need to go back to “school” and take the course that taught what the LAW is and to read even the fine print. Sad day when those who sit on the “Bench” and “do their own interpretations” of the Law! My Dad use to say, they “cut off their nose to spite their face”!

  • mjmaf

    Obama ignored the other 2 Branches of government many times. Time to override this treasonous, fake court!

  • donl

    I smell a George Soros RAT.

  • Ronnie

    Drain the swamp and also drain the illegal trash from our country and take the liberals with them, job stealing son of a bitches!

  • Mark Tercsak

    Under Article I, Section 8, Subsection 9 of the United States Constitution and Under Article III of the United States Constitution, Congress can abolish the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals and replace it.
    Or they can fire the Three judges of the Circuit and Judge Robart for not acting in good behaviour, that is in Article III of the Constitution, there is no such thing as a life time appointment.

    • rocky

      It is my understanding that the appointing authority ( The Prez ) can remove and replace any judge that has been appointed by a preceding authority ( some other Prez ) . No different than cabinet appointments… just never (?) been done.
      It seems that one that interprets and administers the law is somehow above it.

  • James Maxwell

    They are morons who refuse to obey and follow the law as written, One joint to many and their
    common sense flew out the window along with their morals, value and integrity. Easier for them
    to bow to the fruit loops, snow flakes, moon beams and George Soros money than to actually
    enforce the laws of our Nation and morality. Wonder what the price of a judge is out in La La
    land is now? Two joints and a snowflake?

  • ralph

    Judge Robart needs to be arrested for supporting ISIS in acts of Terrorism

  • DonRS

    SPLIT the 9th Circus Court of Appeals into TWO NEW Appeals Courts – the 12th and13th. Spread the existing loony tune 9thy Circus Justices across the 3 courts, then appoint a majority of “originalist” judges to each of these courts. Problem solved!

  • rocky

    Prez’s joint press meet with Canada PM, and I again ask…
    “When are they going to take down that discussting yellow Muslim backdrop installed by the previous failure” ???

  • RsGoat

    Two points do American Courts have jurisdiction outside of our boarders which is where the Executive Orders were applied and two do Amer courts have access to any intelligence data giving them the ability to adjust a risk assessment of how their ruling’s will effect the security and safety of the people of our country? The second is easier to answer. NO they do not have security clearance to ask questions or the reasonable ability to determine if a threat exists from with in a country other then what our media is willing to report! The first issues is harder unless you were stationed overseas in the military and paid attention. Any country we have forces in stationed in we also have a “Status of Forces Agreement” (SOFA) with. among other things it works out the legal details of how the military members will be treated should they break the laws of the country they are in! It generally allows for the Armed Forces to dish out punishment to avoid seeing our soldiers, sailor airmen and marines left in foreign prisons for years but instead should the crime warrant it be shipped back to America to serve their time.In some cases where a country dose not brook quarreling this has kept a few from being put in stocks and whipped before the crowd for fighting! I personally know of one time the Innocent be came the guilty at the police station for a well placed bribe so the SOFA is needed. WE CAN NOT enforce our laws in foreign countries or our rights no matter how much people here think they are worth!
    While the door is open any terrorist who has the hopes of making a plan can work their way to our country and set up house at the welcome of our Court System. Once they are here our Constitution applies but not until. In the past, Years ago when we took in new people we looked for those who would be a benefit to our country but now we are even taking those who will bring tears and ruin. That is not what keeps a country alive and vibrant, that is what eats a country out from the inside the out just like a termite infestation or cancer.

  • pj4me

    Then why are they getting away with it? Where is Congress? Who is standing with Trump? He seems to be standing alone all the time.

  • obamasucks

    The 9th circuit court has been overturned so many times its like a spinning top! Bunch of FOOLS in that laughable ‘court’!