California Proposes Single-Payer Healthcare System

11

A California Assembly committee recently approved two measures to overhaul the Golden State’s healthcare system with the goal of providing free coverage to all residents.

Well, “free” in the sense that residents wouldn’t have a co-pay, monthly premiums, or any out-of-pocket expenses to see their primary care provider or visit a hospital for major procedures. But, we all know that there is no such thing as a free lunch (or health physical), so who are they proposing pay for all these medical appointments? 

Taxpayers, of course. But only the wealthy ones. This is good if you’re stuck in the middle income brackets, but bad if you’d like to achieve upward mobility in your earnings. Assembly Bill 1400 looks to set up CalCare and the accompanying Assembly Constitutional Amendment 11 seeks to change the state’s tax code to pay for it through a voter referendum. 

State leaders from both parties have theoretically supported the single-payer system. But even Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom hasn’t pledged full support for this pair of bills that would dramatically alter the healthcare system as Californians know it. And even if the plan does pass through the state legislature, a voter referendum to change the tax code would need to be authorized, and that won’t show up on a ballot until at least 2024. 

Other states have tried out single-payer systems before, and all have thrown in the towel before enactment or shortly thereafter. Vermont adopted this type of system in 2011, but it only lasted three years before folding due to rising costs and lagging tax revenue. Colorado and Massachusetts similarly attempted to create a single-payer system, but the bills didn’t pass in either state. 

Even California has tried this system before. In 1994, a proposal appeared on the ballot that would have created a single-payer statewide system, but it didn’t receive enough votes to pass. Then again in 2017, a single-payer system was introduced in the state legislature and passed the Senate, but didn’t get a vote in the assembly due to concerns over its $400 billion cost. 

Supporters say that AB 1400 has worked out the kinks that stymied its passage before. Those who want it to pass say their goal is to obtain health coverage for all Californians, regardless of immigration status. California is home to a large population of immigrants, mostly Hispanic, who travel with the harvest seasons to work the fields as crops are collected from the fields. This demographic is an important part of California’s economy, and the fruit and vegetable supply for much of the country, but since many are undocumented aliens, obtaining healthcare, admission to college, and other benefits of citizenship have long been difficult – if not impossible – for them. 

AB 1400 would give California a taxpayer-funded system like those found in the United Kingdom, Canada, and Japan. The bill’s success or failure in passage and potential implementation will be closely watched by policymakers in other states, as well as the federal government and citizens, as many are faced with growing medical bills or lack of health insurance altogether. 

11 Comments
  1. parbrize says

    Adored the photos, i actually like the one of this
    image, perfecto. https://parbrize-online.ro/parbrize/parbrize.php

  2. op Deze site says

    Tijdens de herfstperiode plus voorjaar en de avonden van de zomer is het
    aangeraden om de palm met vocht te besproeien. Dat verwijdert stofdeeltjes van de bladeren waardoor ze beter
    licht kunnen absorberen en evenzo mooier worden.

    My web blog … op Deze site

  3. poker online idn 88 says

    Kondisi seperti ini yang akan membuat kalian senantiasa
    belajar lebih bagus lagi, kalian memang diwajibkan memiliki banyak ilmu yang dapat memudahkan dalam menentukan berjenis-jenis ragam keputusan serta teknik, yang nantinya dapat kalian pakai untuk memenangkan sebuah perminan judi
    tipe poker online.
    Demikian berita kami sampaikan mengenai tempat game judi poker online kemujuran besar, semoga
    kalian selalu dapat menerima lebih banyak keberuntungan dengan cara termudah.
    Lantas daftarkan diri kalian kini juga untuk menerima lebih
    banyak pengalaman dan pelajaran berharga di dalam
    sana

  4. SU says

    NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE…ESPECIALLY FOR SENIORS….HERE COMES DEATH PANELS

  5. Bill Hill says

    A single-payer system (Canada) is not the same as a single-provider system (UK or the US Veterans system)..

  6. Bob says

    Don’t you just love it??? We know the definition of insanity is to keep doing the same thing over and over, and expecting a different result. This insanity is keeping in the finest traditions of Left-wing Loon California right on track. If I was a Las Vegas bookie, I would start collecting bets right now on how long this stupidity lasts??? I guess the morons in the “Golden State” haven’t figured out the fact that single-payer is a disaster, always has been in Canada and Europe, and in the U.S. where it has been tried/failed—and always will be. Imagine an area with over 35 million people (the population of Canada) lacking services and waiting for non-essential services forever such as elective surgery and other procedures? But it is the same—-those with big money will buy the care they want, and the little people will be crushed as the victims in the process. I am so glad I live in Florida.

  7. Valkyrie says

    Let’s hear what people have to say about it when many will have to wait as long as a year to see a doctor, most of whom will either be overwhelmed with patients or will refuse anyone who cannot pay cash up front for their treatment. England is bogged down in delays and paperwork and so is every other country that has a government program. Government is the great leveler; all are treated the same and it’s usually way below what people would want. How many times must this be perpetuated on people until it finally stops or enough people die in order to change things? The main point is that you lose another freedom to determine your own future. When the state takes over, you will ALWAYS lose in the end and you will eventually pay for what they wasted. Free enterprise gives the consumer control. State programs, with all of their stated good intentions, will always fall way below expectations in every way except for the tax the state collects to provide their failed programs. At least one third of those funds will go to administer their failed objectives and much will secretly go into the back pockets of influential people who will keep the status quo moving along. What is it that they think we don’t get?

  8. hwjPdBUGAku says

    zZJQhcVysFiYkNM

  9. John R. DeJulius says

    If you keep voting this TRASH into office, there won’t be anyone left to PAY for the care that you will NEVER receive !!!!!!!!!!!!!

  10. gysXBjNqTPDQz says

    emxWwLoDy

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.