Americans Aren’t Buying What Hillary’s Selling

180

According to a new poll released by Quinnipiac University, Hillary Clinton’s scandals are catching up to her. Between the missing emails, the cloud of suspicion hanging over the Benghazi attack, and the latest questions surrounding the Clinton Foundation, Americans are losing their faith in the Democratic contender for president. 54 percent of U.S. voters think that Hillary is not to be trusted. Only 38 percent say that they still have reason to believe anything that comes out of her mouth.

While those numbers look grim, the poll isn’t all bad news for Clinton. 62 percent of respondents respect her leadership qualities, and she remains out in front of everyone who might stand in the way of her ultimate goal. Marco Rubio, Jeb Bush, Rand Paul, and Chris Christie are behind her by a few percentage points, and she leaves any potential Democratic rival in the dust. Even with the scandals, this is her race to lose.

Americans are accustomed to treating politicians with a certain level of distrust. Campaign promises have become a bad joke, scandals are commonplace, and by the time an election swings into full bloom, most people are just ready to grit their teeth and be done with it. So it remains to be seen how badly Hillary will be hurt by this notion that she is dishonest. It certainly didn’t hurt her husband too badly.

At the same time, though, we aren’t talking about illicit affairs. We’re talking about hard-hitting scandals that not only throw Clinton’s character into question, but also leave open the possibility that she broke the law. What was on that private email server that she is determined to keep out of the hands of investigators? What, if anything, was covered up in the aftermath of the Libyan terrorist attack? Did she grant favors to foreign entities after they donated to her charitable foundation?

Until these questions are answered, they are going to haunt Clinton’s campaign. It isn’t a right-wing conspiracy. It isn’t political maneuvering, meant to cast her in the worst possible light. The American people deserve to know what these politicians are doing in Washington. We don’t need to trust them. We need them to follow the laws and regulations we have in place to promote government transparency.

And that’s what Clinton fails to understand. She sees herself as above the petty rules that others have to follow. And she is seemingly indignant that anyone would question her integrity. She doesn’t see how she only makes things worse for herself by keeping the blinds shut so tightly. Then again, if we ever get a real peek behind the curtain, we may finally understand why she wanted to maintain that secrecy. Sometimes the appearance of impropriety is just as bad as the crime.

But sometimes…sometimes it isn’t.

180 Comments
  1. DivineEncounters says

    Don’t bet on it. I am several sites and I tell you now there are more Liberal dummies out there than I care to count and they all love her.

    The talking points are that the Republicans are attempting to get her out of the race. That the book written about her was by a Republican. That she is the best thing since coffee and I tell ya folks it is going to take some real effort on the Republican side to make sure any Democrat candidate is exposed.’

    I think with the Main Media and Liberal rags turning on her they don’t want her as their candidate.

    1. MAHB001 says

      If the rags turn on her.

      My bet is that they will not.

    2. fred says

      I just hope they do turn on her, Divine! The MSM is so corrupt I don’t count on anything being a done deal anymore! MSNBC might as well be Putin’s private network they are so evil, they are lying frauds!

      1. OSAMA OBAMA says

        Just recently, two more Barack Obama activists were awarded with high-profile jobs in the media.

        Ronan Farrow, a former “special adviser” to Secretary of State
        Hillary Clinton, and Joy-Ann Reid, a former press aide for Obama’s
        presidential campaign, have both earned themselves jobs on MSNBC, where
        they can parrot White House talking points directly to the American
        people.

        First it was NBC News anchor Brian Williams who
        came forward and admitted he had embellished his story of having been
        in a Chinook helicopter over Iraq that took enemy fire in 2003.
        Claiming, incredibly, that it was a mere lapse of memory, Williams
        acknowledged in February that it was not the helicopter he was riding in
        that was shot at but an aircraft in front of him.

        Now it’s chief foreign correspondent Richard Engel’s turn. Engel’s account that he and members of his crew were captured
        by forces loyal to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad (in fact it was
        a Sunni militant group) and that, as they were being rescued, he
        saw “one of his captors lying dead.”

        On Wednesday, Engel and NBC published a “correction” of sorts. It is no longer Engel who saw
        the corpse of a captor but “one of our producers [who] says he saw and
        stepped over a body that was lying next to the front wheel.” Engel, as a
        member of the media, violated his sacred trust with his audience, for
        whatever reason.

        Williams’s punishment was a 6-month-suspension without pay.
        In deciding Engel’s punishment, NBC should take into account
        that Williams at least overtly admitted to having lied. Engel has not.
        An email distributed by Ben Rhodes, senior policy makers, among them
        Susan Rice, are told to 1) blame the internet video for the violence, 2)
        deflect attention from greater policy failures (one presumes he’s
        talking about everything the Obama regime had touched), and 3) emphasize
        Obama’s cool and collected leadership.

        “This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our
        country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took
        the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at
        American embassies over an awful internet video that we had nothing to
        do with. It is hard for the American people to make sense of that
        because it is senseless, and it is totally unacceptable.” Hillary Clinton

        Clinton
        had said during a March 2008 speech that while visiting Bosnia in 1996
        as first lady, she remembered “landing under sniper fire.” A greeting
        ceremony had to be canceled, she said, as her party “ran with our heads
        down to get into the vehicles to get to our base.”

        Videotape showed Clinton and her daughter Chelsea and their entourage
        instead striding across a tarmac with smiles and greeting a retinue of
        well-wishers.

        NBC News
        investigative reporter Jeff Rossen was in “intense agony” and had “meds
        lined up” as he filed an apparently slanderous and libelous combination
        of print and video stories

        Rolling Stone magazine retracted its article about a brutal gang rape at a University of Virginia
        fraternity after the release of a report on Sunday that concluded the
        widely discredited piece was the result of failures at every stage of
        the process.
        The
        report, published by the Columbia Graduate School of Journalism , said the magazine failed to engage in
        “basic, even routine journalistic practice” to verify details of the
        ordeal that the magazine’s source, identified only as Jackie, described
        to the article’s author, Sabrina Rubin Erdely.

        1. fred says

          The solution is to never trust anything coming out of the MSM even Fox is not to be trusted anymore! Rupert just loves money, not truth!

          1. OfcShane (MGySgt USMC) says

            You just described the major media center in general… worldwide…

        2. dinkerduo says

          The story of the “ducking sniper fire” story was sooooo unnecessary—but it was corrected almost immediately by the Commander of the base AND her security detail that both said NO WAY DID THAT HAPPEN—but she kept telling the story!
          I’VE NEVER BEEN UNDER SNIPER FIRE—I THINK I’D KNOW IT IF IT HAPPENED OR NOT AND NOT LIE AND SAY IT DID WHEN IT DIDN’T–THE VIDEO SHOWS NOTHING OF THE SORT!!! THE CLINTONS LIE–THEN THEY SAY THEY DIDN’T LIE–THAT IT WAS MISS-REMEMBERED??????????? OR FUZZY MEMORY—JESUS–SHE WOULD KNOW THE DIFFERENCE! AND THAT’S JUST ONE LIE! I hope this all takes them DOWN!! They need to give the money back!! They are no more a charity then I am and their tax exempt status should be taken away and them fined millions of dollars and then THEY NEED TO GO TO JAIL! It’s going to take a couple of years to sort it all out and that will be after Obozo is OUT of office so maybe something WILL happen to them!!! And this uranium deal is the worst as Russia has 20% our OUR uranium–so they can give/sell uranium to IRAN WITH OUR URANIUM—but if the deal was illegal then the deal can be undone!! And to keep ANY sort of creds–the LSM is starting to say something–not enough–but something!!!

          1. OfcShane (MGySgt USMC) says

            Dinker, you have high hopes it seems. I think that evil will continue to rear it’s ugly head until good, literally, chops the fkker off… There is the remaining compromise – in the Middle East, with Russia, with North Korea, with Shi’ite Islamic radicals around the world, in politics, in our backyards, in general.

            We have been patient and sought compromise for to long. Let us decide not to debate to death like Obama does with the ISIL fanatics. Like Bush said (and did) you have to Davey Crockett this thing and “Draw a line in the sand,” only then can it end, and IT UNDOUBTEDLY HAS TO END!

          2. Chuck Lynch says

            By the way Sarge, Old Davy surrendered at the end of the battle for the Alamo and was tortured to death along with 6 of his captured compatriots by several of the officers on Tony Lopez’ staff, who actually hadn’t even fought in the battle.
            It’s all in Enrique de la Pena’s diary. Please check it out on the internet!!

          3. OfcShane (MGySgt USMC) says

            I was merely pointing out the “draw a line in the sand,” reference as something quoted from the story of Davey Crockett. If I were to say to you, “Experience is the teacher of all things,” do you think I am hoping you are to be betrayed with a knife in the back?

            …and not to be conceited but it’s Tops, Master Guns, Master Gunney — Sarge is for a Sergeant, which is an E5, MGySgt is E9. I’ll forgive you this time… LOL!

          4. Marialice Barone says

            She tells lies even when she doesn’t have to. People with anxiety disorder worry when they don’t have anything to worry about..she worries when she doesn’t have something to lie about!

        3. OfcShane (MGySgt USMC) says

          Well OO – the internet is an evil place… A place where people can freely (well almost – sort of – freely) gather together no matter how far apart and instantly share open minded thoughts and ideas that are generally accessible to the (nearly) entire citizenry of the world!? A place where both sides can (almost) unbiasedly share their versions and observations without (all normal) 3rd party filters and at time come to common consensus.

          Especially, now with smartphone technology, all the pictures and videos be shown of things we would have had to listen to a third party’s interpretation on previously… Not to mention how those 3rd party persons must feel losing their say in the world’s direction.

          That evil place, and all it’s.. it’s… porn…

          LOL!

          1. Chuck Lynch says

            The place is full of what Hillary considers right wingggggg conspiracies!!

          2. OfcShane (MGySgt USMC) says

            LOL! Yeah, everything is a conspiracy though — unless someone in government or modern society is a true lone wolf type, all their endeavors are generally conspiracies. In true definition of the word, a conspiracy is merely a plot devised by two or more who stand to gain at the expense of another or others without their knowledge or consent. Conspiracies abound and yet one is considered crazy to point out facts that would allude such things — a conspiracy of itself. LOL!

        4. Mark Clemens says

          MSNBC should be called MSDNC Network.
          My
          Sorry
          Democratic
          National
          Convention
          (Network)

          1. GodBlessRealAmerica!!! says

            CNN= Clinton news network of lies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          2. GODBlessRealAmerica#1 says

            LIBERAL OWN IT THAT HATE TRADITIONAL AMERICA!!!!

          3. dustoff 63 says

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/31db25236bacca53bf9235703c746fad582447826917d37fdb5cac04d98b9304.jpg

            Lets look at what really happened in Benghazi that Hillary thinks is not worth looking at.

      2. Chuck Lynch says

        I see you’re buying that MSM bovine excrement about Putin too, huh?

        Russia Has Western Enemies, Not Partners

        By Paul Craig Roberts PaulCraigRoberts.org December 6, 2014

        The
        US House of Representatives has joined Hillary Clinton, Obama, the neoconservatives, Washington’s vassals, and the American and European presstitutes in demonizing Russia and President Putin. The House resolution against Russia is a packet of lies, but that did not stop the resolution from passing by a vote of 411 for and 10 against.

        The entire world should take note that the American people are capable of electing only ten intelligent representatives. Ten people out of 435 is 2 percent. And yet Washington
        declares itself to be the “exceptional,” “indispensable” country empowered to
        exercise hegemony over the world!

        No one should be surprised to see Washington, its presstitutes and European vassal states using the same propagandistic lies against Russia and Putin as were used against Iraq and Saddam Hussein, Libya and Gaddafi, Syria and Assad, Afghanistan and the
        Taliban, and Iran. Washington is fearful of the rise of Russia and China, of the leadership demonstrated by Vladimir Putin, of the formation of new organizations independent of Washington, such as the BRICS. While the George W. Bush regime was sidetracked by its “six week, $70 billion war,” which turned out to be, so far, a multi-trillion dollar 13-year losing operation, Putin kicked out some of the American agents who were contaminating Russian sovereignty and rebuilt the country.

        When Putin blocked the planned US invasions of Syria and Iran, Washington decided that something had to be done about Putin and Russia. Washington had spent $5 billion dollars buying Ukrainian politicians and funding fifth column NGOs. With Putin distracted with the Olympics, Washington struck, overthrew the elected Ukrainian government and
        installed its puppets.

        The puppets set about antagonizing Ukraine’s Russian population in provinces that formerly were part of Russia but were attached to Ukraine by Soviet leaders when Russia and Ukraine were the same country. Russians threatened with death and the banning of their language naturally did not want to be victims of Washington’s puppet government in Kiev. Crimea voted to reunite with Russia from whence it came, and so did the eastern and southern provinces.

        Washington and its the vassals and presstitutes lied and described these acts of self-determination as Russian invasion and annexation. Russia is falsely accused of having troops occupying the breakaway provinces.

        The purpose of Washington’s false accusations is to destabilize Russia and the country’s government. Washington has many avenues by which to destabilize Russia. Washington has the US funded NGOs, the foreign owned Russian media, and the House Resolution calls for Washington to expand propaganda broadcasting into Russia in the Russian language. Washington has cultivated oligarchs, business interests and Russian politicians who see their economic and political interests aligned with the West. There are
        deluded Russian youths who think freedom resides in the West and others
        represented by such as Pussy Riot who prefer the West’s amoralism or immoralism
        to the Christian culture that the Russian government supports.

        If Washington fails to destabilize Russia or to have Putin assassinated, frustration could result in more reckless behavior that could lead to military conflict. The House Resolution calls on Obama to arm Ukraine with US weapons so that Ukraine can conquer the separatist provinces and take back Crimea. There are constant calls from NATO itself for
        more military forces on Russia’s borders, and NATO war games are conducted near
        Russia’s borders. Washington wants to include the former Russian provinces of
        Georgia and Ukraine in NATO, something that Russia cannot accept.

        Washington is placing the world on the path to Armageddon, as Professor Michel Chossudovsky makes clear in “Towards A World War III Scenario” (Global Research, 2012).

        The Russian government downplays the dangers and continues to speak of “our Western partners,” with whom the Russian government hopes to work things out. The Russian government and the Russian people–indeed all the peoples of the earth–should understand that Russia has no partners in the West. Russia only has enemies.

        Washington has made it completely clear that Russia can be part of the West only as a vassal state and not as a sovereign country with its own interests and an independent policy. Washington’s demand for hegemony does not permit the existence of other
        sovereign countries sufficiently strong to resist Washington’s will. As the ideology of hegemony has a powerful hold on Washington and is institutionalized in the neoconservative control of critical government offices and media, war is
        the almost certain outcome.

        Washington’s puppet rulers of Europe are the enablers of the neoconservative war-mongers. In all of Europe there is not a government independent of Washington. Pawns like Merkel, Cameron, and Hollande are selling out human life.

        Russian government officials, such as Putin and Lavrov, address the facts, but to Washington and its European vassals facts are not important. What is important is to destabilize Russia. The conflict that Washington has brought to Russia cannot be addressed on a factual basis.

        Washington knew that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction and no al Qaeda connections. Washington knew Assad did not use chemical weapons. Washington knew that Gaddafi was being set up with lies. Washington knows that Iran has no nuclear weapons. What was important to Washington was not the truth but the overthrow of these governments.

        While the Russian government was preoccupied with the olympics, Washington struck in Ukraine, installing a puppet government. It is likely the case that the only solution that can make the festering problem of Ukraine go away is the reincorporation of Ukraine in
        Russia.

        Arrogance and hubris usually result in overreach, and overreach could break up Washington’s empire. But Washington doesn’t think so. Just as Washington put its NGOs into the streets of Kiev in what is called the Maiden protests, Washington has put its NGOs in the streets of Hong Kong, hoping that the protests or riots will spread to other Chinese cities.

        Russia and China are far too open to the West than is good for them. Tsar Nicholas II did not expect his government to be overthrown, but Kerensky did overthrow Nicholas’ government in the February Revolution only to be overthrown by Lenin in the October Revolution. The Chinese don’t expect to be overthrown, but neither did Viktor Yanukovych.

        Political life is full of ambitious persons and agendas. Putin faces these ambitions in Russia. Washington knows that Russia cannot be turned into a vassal state as long as Putin is in office. Therefore, the demonization of Putin and plots against him will continue.

        1. fred says

          I don’t know if you were replying to me, all I know about Putin, is he rode to power under Yeltsin’s KGB, then eliminated many in his path by death according to some escaped Russian Journalists. He IS helping Assad right now and I think that is as wrong as helping Isil…

    3. Mike with the Silver Star says

      Yeah, if the left wing liberal media washes their hands of her, she has a long road to go……

      1. omegaman says

        Mike — NO…She’s dead.

    4. ArmyCombatVet says

      There is no Republican party, it’s a one party system as evidenced by the actions taken by these complicit traitors since the last election in Nov. 2014! They just voted to replace Eric Holdup with a miserable piece of human waste, who will further destroy the rights of Americans, beyond what the former POS did. Behind this act of treason is lizard man, the disgraceful, spineless communist senate majority leader, Mitch McLizardneck along with the other senators that let this happen. Take Sen. Flake, for example, who voted for her……..has there ever been a more appropriate name for a traitor and a snake. How Arizona hasn’t put this vermin out of his misery for treason by violating his oath of office, just astounds me! There were several other cowards who caved, like little fairy mouth Lindsey Graham of SC, a lying sack of cow pies! All of these traitors who confirmed this amoeba are complicit traitors. We may call them RINOS but that doesn’t near address the evil these subhumans represent! And yes I’m pissed off and have a right to be……….I never violated my oath and never will!

    5. LastGasp says

      Obozo’s handlers don’t want her in the race,,,,they will give obozo another term one way or another. His purpose has not been achieved, yet.

    6. Mark Clemens says

      Why does she want to be President?
      My best guess is, because her husband did it. I reckon she wants to show him, she can do it to. Until the Lewinsky affair, I never heard she had any political ambitions.
      IMHO this has to be the sorriest reason for the Presidency I’ve ever seen!!!
      If she could NOT keep up with her husband’s affairs, how can she keep up with America’s affairs? Also, if she couldn’t satisfy her husband’s needs, how could she satisfy a whole countries needs?

  2. Michael Dennewitz says

    G A W D, that woman is fugly!!!

    1. guest says

      And so…. OOOOOLD.

      1. dinkerduo says

        Hey wait just a minute—not all old people are bad—you pickin’ on old people??
        You better NOT be pickin’ on old people!! 🙂 🙂

        1. guest says

          Lol, no my friend, I wouldn’t pick on old people. That would be self defeating.

        1. Deplorable WIOHism says

          Looks like he’s trying to hide a great big grin. Awesome mem.

    2. OSAMA OBAMA says

      Cough!(all libturd, bra burners are) What?

    3. b.badenoff says

      YEa,and that’s the best picture they could find

    4. GodBlessRealAmerica!!! says

      Now thats Liberal ugliness lol

  3. Edward A Rhodes Rhodes says

    If you are just now discovering the “Clinton Dishonesty” you have not been paying any attention for the last 30+ years!

    1. fred says

      I think it’s been since Watergate so at least 40+ years Ed! She was fired for lying and fabricating evidence! What about Whitewater? the Mena airport where children were killed so the Clintons and Tysons could bring their drugs into the country to finance bill’s political ambitions? They are pure evil, and the word has to be hammered repeatedly out to the public to understand the level of evil this b***h is capable of.

      1. dancingontheheadofapin says

        The link will give you a sobering picture of this woman who is running for president as well as some back story on Bill. A rather sordid history in my view.
        http://www.americasfreedomfighters.com/2014/01/03/the-clinton-body-count-americas-freedom-fighters/

        1. fred says

          If every American could read that article, Hillary would be finished, I knew about the murders from the scandals, Whitewater, Mena, several others, and can you imagine how many have been killed that can’t be directly linked to them, yet they have been involved in having those people executed? These are both horrible lifelong criminals, and she needs to withdraw from running or some of this will come to light before the heavy campaigning begins!

      2. Douglas W. Rodrigues says

        Too many people surrounding the Clinton’s have ended up dead to be a coincidence. Can you imagine all seven of Bill Clinton’s security detail in Arkansas when he was the governor ended up dead? They all knew the dirty deeds Clinton was doing, and so they had to be eliminated. I think the total number now is about 100 dead. Anybody who knew anything is dead.

        1. fred says

          So if we can guess 100, multiply by 10+ to get the real number! The Clintons are murdering monsters, and they have gotten away with it because someone in law enforcement and the justice dept has been covering for them the whole way. They are the worst of the worst in my opinion. I hope karma comes for them very soon….

        2. Chuck Lynch says

          But, but, but Hillary says it was all a right wingggggg conspiracy and they all, each and every one of them, committed suicide!!

    2. OfcShane (MGySgt USMC) says

      ROFL!!! They’re asleep Ed.

    3. Spark1845 says

      I’ve been watching them for too long. Billy Bob and Hillary are MURDEROUS people. PERIOD. They should both be jailed, tried, convicted and EXECUTED along with Assbama, the PUNK ASS BITCH.

      1. GodBlessRealAmerica!!! says

        EXACTLY!!!

    4. fcutch says

      I ve been paying attention Ed. However it is still unbelievable that people continue to buy the Clintons bullsh!t

      1. Whistlebritches says

        I understand Billy Bob is in a long line (blood relation) to the Rothchild clan. Hillary has been part of that clan (thru marriage) and thats the best reasoning I have for her “Elite” exemptions of any criminal punishment for her numerous crimes for which she has and continues to commit. If this is at all incorrect, please enlighten us as to an alternative explanation. I too am baffled, because of all the free passes the Clinton’s have been given.

        1. fcutch says

          It helps their cause having the media in their pocket. In the eyes of the media, the Clintons are saints

          1. GodBlessRealAmerica!!! says

            LOL You are right the Liberal racist Media is a disgrace!!

          2. Chuck Lynch says

            Because they are afraid of them and afraid of what Soros will do to them if they dare spill the beans on them!!

    5. Sue says

      Hillary Rodham Clinton was born dishonest so that would make it 70 years and not 30…That old bag is like the energizer bunny and doesn’t know when to quit…Criminals should be locked up in prison and not campaigning for president of America. Enough of the Clinton and Bush dynasty’s.

    6. Connie Alsip says

      I wish I could give you 10 likes!

  4. Reuben Hart says

    This is a ‘stop the presses’. Democrats actually objecting to one of their own being a liar, a cheat, a conniver? But that’s their bread and butter. Only evil ogres can get elected by Democrats. If they start being nit picky and object to this one or that one…on what grounds? Who knows where this will end?

  5. Remmie says

    The Uranium One deal was pretty clearly treason for profit. As long as the demoncrat party supports her it is clearly the party of anti-American corruption.

    1. dinkerduo says

      Yup!! Like most everything she DID was treasonous while being SofS!! The rest of what she has done is just illegal! for the last 35 years–since Slick was AG of AK it started–oh wait–maybe a little before that–when she started at the rose Law Firm–don’t know what came first–the AG for Slick or her employment at Rose! No matter–Slick and Tyson smuggled in millions of dollars in cocaine–then made millions laundering said money—for YEARS!! Or probably still going on! I keep saying it’s the people at the top who is keeping the war on drugs unwinnable–as THEY are making too much money off the stuff!!!

      1. Mark Clemens says

        A country that declares war on drugs. Is just declaring war on its own citizens.
        Money, Money, Money……….
        In fines, and confiscation of property.

  6. MAHB001 says

    I do not put much credence in polls.

    We must continue to fight for the truth. It is the only thing that will bring Hildibeast down.

    1. ginny says

      Polls are easily manipulated to produce an outcome of the pollers choice. Mostly to keep conservatives from bothering to vote. However this time, like in 2012, it might back fire.

      1. LastGasp says

        I worked for a PR firm that created polls. We were paid to get certain results, the more “creative.” the more we were paid.

        1. Mark Clemens says

          It really depends on the polls subject, and who they ask.
          For example Locking Doors.
          Most people w/common sense know to do this.
          If we survey thieves, having UNLOCKED doors would be a more popular result.

          1. LastGasp says

            Absolutely! When polls are created nothing is left to chance. The results have to be what the client wants regardless of the truth.

          2. Mark Clemens says

            Yep,
            In the middle of this story is a poll.
            Do You Think Obama is Deliberately Ruining America.
            I’m sure here it’s gonna be a high number. On the left, I’m sure the numbers would be lower.

      2. Mark Clemens says

        The best Poles have Strippers on them.
        Ask Bill Clinton………he knows!

    2. GodBlessRealAmerica!!! says

      TRUTH =PRESIDENT TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  7. Robert Barnes says

    Tell all people about http://www.commieblaster.com Expose all the enemies in the gov.

  8. Valor says

    54% of Americans may believe Hillary is untrustworthy, but that doesn’t matter. All that matters to a large percentage of Americans is that she can be the first woman President. The fact she is crooked, a consummate liar, and will finish the destruction of America is irrelevant to what passes for far too many Americans.

  9. papa doug says

    This would not be a good time to travel abroad, who wants to be laughed at every time someone learns you’re American? We are set to elect a corrupt, woman president who knows she will get away with her crimes and corruption and throws it in our face every chance she gets and yet women are chomping at the bit to vote for her. I don’t know any more, I used to believe the average woman was intelligent but now I’m beginning to rethink that assessment!
    The only way Hillary could be exposed any more would be for her to be naked!

    1. Ron says

      Absolutly correct but eeeewww what a revolting thought first thing in the morn. think i’ll go hurl

    2. jim says

      papa Hillary being naked OMG what an uuuuuuuuugly site that would be, one can see why her dick head hubby had girls friends

      1. Michael Dennewitz says

        Yeah, but Billy Boy was really musically inclined! He played the whoremonica really well.. heehee

        1. NJM says

          Good one, Michael!

        2. Mark Clemens says

          ………And the Sexophone

      2. dinkerduo says

        Nobody should mention Killary and naked in the same sentence!

    3. Mike with the Silver Star says

      I wouldn’t count too many women out….look at all these newbie college kids with brainwashed mush between their ears….

    4. jeannemartin says

      When did the American people go astray? When did it become important that we elect the first black president? Why is it important to elect the first woman president? Will we then want the first gay president or the first Spanish president or the first dog that comes along to be president???
      Why don’t we elect the most qualified person to be our next president! Someone who loves our country and wants its people to thrive and be happy in it!
      Now that’s a thought!!!

      We’re still reeling from the election of our fist black president!!
      I can only imagine what Hillary has to offer??

      1. guest says

        I thought we already had a gay president

        1. OSAMA OBAMA says

          OHillary won’t be our first woman president.

          1. guest says

            Yep, we can’t forget about Valerie.

          2. OSAMA OBAMA says

            I was talking about Oblame-o

          3. guest says

            Oh? Did he get jennerized when I was trying not to notice?

      2. OSAMA OBAMA says

        Too bad our first black president couldn’t have been military hero Allen West!!

        1. b.badenoff says

          Or Fred Sanford

          1. OSAMA OBAMA says

            Instead, we got Aunt Esther.

        2. Michael Dennewitz says

          Yeah, but this one is a mooselum halfbreed…

        3. NJM says

          I would have voted for Allen West in a heartbeat!

        4. Mark Clemens says

          That is part of the problem. The last 3 presidents never served a full military tour. They just heard Was is Hell, never experienced it. That’s why they spend American Blood, as reckless as they do our money!!!!

      3. Michael Dennewitz says

        You go girl!!

      4. chamuiel says

        We already have our first gay president in obama.

      5. LastGasp says

        The first,,,,,,

    5. ginny says

      Definitely not this woman. You would be surprised at the number of women who would not vote for her.

      1. dinkerduo says

        And I’m one—the woman thing is absurd–just like the first black thing was absurd—look at what that got us–a ruined country-that’s what–and he is only HALF black! We should be DONE with the “first” thing–elect the MOST QUALIFIED conservative Constitutionalist we can find! And yes–we already have our first “gay” potus–we got two for one “firsts”with Obozo! Jesus–Jesus–if you’re coming back–will you please HURRY! Thanks!

    6. LastGasp says

      Eeeeeeeww! Thanks for that image,,,,,,gonna be nightmares, for sure 😉

    7. Mark Clemens says

      We could repeal the twenty first amendment……….

  10. Andrei Fedunyk says

    It’s OK, planting season is coming soon and “they” will buy Hillary’s “product” for their “organic” gardens.

  11. new york says

    None of this matters. If Hillary gets the nomination, she will be elected. She is the media’s golden girl, so they will cover up any wrong thing she does. Blacks and Hispanics will vote for her almost unanimously because of all the goodies she will promise them, and at least 60 per cent of women will vote for her simply because she’s a woman. This isn’t a stretch when you remember that JFK received 78 per cent of the4 Catholic vote. So barring some totally unforeseen development, Hillary will be our next president.

  12. Robert Walsh says

    I don’t trust polls, look what happened in the 2012 election, polls were saying Democrats were a head, but they got their heads handed to them. I’m sure Hilary’s numbers are a lot worse than what the polls are saying. All these lying politicians have to go. The lame stream(of lies) media is one sided, and I can’t believe what they say, they always leave important information out, or they just don’t report the story.

    1. Michael Dennewitz says

      An excellently trained sniper or two could fix everything!! heehee

      1. jim marcum says

        geez. better watch what you say. I know your kidding but………

    2. dinkerduo says

      If anyone thinks that her approval ratings are around 50% is an idiot—anyone who thinks Obozo approval ratings are around 50% is a moron—anyone who thinks the unemployment numbers are around 7 % is insane! they can give you any damn number they want–whether or not they are true!

  13. fcutch says

    Its amazing how many truly stupid Americans are alive at the present time. 62% trust her leadership abilities. What a f_cking joke

    1. NJM says

      Jay Leno’s “Jay Walking” segment on his Tonight Show comes to mind…yes, there are a LOT of really stupid (or simply uninformed) citizens in this country!

      1. TexasStomp says

        The ONLY uninformed people today are wilfully ignorant. Everything one needs to know is at their finger tips. The internet has led the horse to water but the horse still has to choose to drink.

  14. fred says

    If anyone votes for this career criminal, master of deception, and murderer they are traitors to this Republic!

  15. Antonio Pires says

    I’m not buying this! The trolls bought the goods from Obuma, but got nothing. Still, they will buy it again from this criminal.

  16. cal3301 says

    If anyone would bother to take notice, Ted Cruz is being left out of most of these polls and only what are deemed real Party Republicans are left in. I’d like to know where his standings are, because his speeches are more in tune with the people on most conservative blogs.

    1. Mike with the Silver Star says

      I wouldn’t put too much credence in early polls…as a matter of fact, I don’t pay attention at all because people vote…not polls. We didn’t even have any primary debates for republicans yet. let’s nominate a candidate then I might be interested to glance at them…..

      1. cal3301 says

        I don’t really pay too much attention myself. I just find it kind of funny that the first person to through their hat in the ring is being left out of the circle so to speak. The Republicans need to get behind one person instead of all of them jumping in for the primary. There are still some more planning to do so.

    2. Ken Trefaller says

      Ted Cruz for Presiddent.

    3. Mark Clemens says

      He was born in Canada.
      If it’s wrong for Obama to be from British East Africa (Kenya). Why is it OK for a Canadian to be President? Both are FOREIGNERS. If you were not born on US SOIL, you have no business being our president…….
      Or so the constitution says.

      1. TexasStomp says

        jus sanguinous

      2. cal3301 says

        Military families live all over the world and their children are born in different countries. Are they not US citizens? Cruz was born in Canada (on the North American continent that holds the USA) and his mother was a US citizen who married a Cuban who became a citizen of this country, the right way. Cruz had dual citizenship and denounce his Canadian one. His birth certificate has been out in the open from the very beginning. By the laws, Cruz is a natural born citizen of the United States and appears to be more American than you.
        On the other hand,Obama’s mother denounced her US citizenship, was a communist, married another man, then moved to Indonesia. Obama attended elite schools in Hawaii as a foreign exchange student when he lived with his grandparents who again were known communist and there is no record of him ever changing his name to Obama.
        Obama’s birth certificate was proven fraudulent by the same man that Obama’s attorneys use to verify documentations. In fact, in the state of Hawaii, you do not have to be born there to receive a Certificate of Birth. It is only a piece of paper that states when you were born, not where. Obama’s own grandmother who mysteriously passed away, stated she witnessed his birth in Kenya.

        1. Mark Clemens says

          Was either of Senator cruz’s parents in the military? US Diplomats? These are the people covered under part II of the 14Th Amendment. If no, he shouldn’t be running. Maybe he should run for the border! Cruz attended foreign schools too. Even though Canada is on the American Continent, it’s still a FOREIGN Country. Are we going to elect Mexicans to the White House, if/after Cruz wins? This is Treasonous, on the Tea Party’s part.
          About this schooling issue you have. Obama and Cruz had the same Harvard Law Professor (I’m not impressed w/this (Obama) students performance) I’m not willing to vote for another one of his students,ever! Actually,if you look at Obama and Cruz’s biographies. They are almost the same!
          Hell, Ted (if that’s his real name) is on ObamaCare. Why? Can’t he afford his own health care? Congress has its own, more expensive plan.
          7 years ago, the Tea Party made a BIG issue out of where/if Obama was born. Now what do they do? Start running a foreign born candidate. Jesus had a word for such actions:
          HYPOCRITES (Say one thing, turn around and go back on it for your own gain)

          1. TexasStomp says

            His mother was born and raise in Delaware. Jus sanguinous. Can we move on now?

          2. Mark Clemens says

            Obama’s mom was raised in Hawaii. It’s where the baby is born that matters.
            I think Ted’s dad had ties to Castro. I’m not real sure. Will look it up later.
            This is past sad. We have over one billion people here. The DNC Puts a foreigner in the WH. Now the Tea Party wants to do the same? Hell, Putin might win in 2020 if we keep this up..

          3. TexasStomp says

            You have been posting this same garbage for over three weeks and every time you do, people go out of their way to patiently explain jus soli and jus sanguinous to you.

            IT IS IN THE CONSTITUTION. BOTH OBAMA AND CRUZ MEET ONE OR MORE OF THOSE TESTS. BOTH ARE AMERICAN CITIZENS. READ THE DAM AMENDMENT AND STOP NATTERING on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on

            ABOUT IT!

          4. Mark Clemens says

            The truth never changes.
            If I change my talking points, how could I tell the truth? The Construction and 14th Amendment says what they say. Until they are revised…….these are the rules. My talking points shall stay the same.

    4. John R. says

      RON PAUL was left out. An honest man has a chance of getting elected is next to none.

      1. cal3301 says

        Every Republican Poll that I have seen, shows Paul up there with Walker. I don’t think they believe Cruz is Republican enough. They show Rubio in those poles, too, and he really should not be allowed to run, according to the requirements. The Democrats can’t fault Cruz, because of Obama.

  17. Mark Tercsak says

    I suggest you folks get out among the common folk, as per Hillary’s chances are a lot better then the poll thinks, most Americans either do not care, what she has done or are just stupid. The poll results prove that stupid comment, on one hand its says she has issues with missing E-mails, texts, etc. and or over Benghazi, yet she is admired for her Leadership. hello those Dead Americans are dead, because; of her lack of “Leadership”.

  18. Mark Tercsak says

    MS. Clinton, acting as the United States Secretary of State, she not only failed in Benghazi, but also North Korea, she did nothing and stood by, just like her boss and the previous President of the United States Of America and allowed them to develop a nuclear weapon. The same is also true with Iran. Lets look at Mrs. Clinton record and her Boss, Iraq was in a hell of a lot better shape before those two came to power, and that is saying something, now the country is split and broken and you have a major war going on there and also in Syria. They backed than they destabilized Egypt by dropping its backing of the then government and it through that country into civil war, where thousands died, American citizens were murdered and at least two were gang raped, Who did Mrs. Clinton and her boss toss their support two the not -so- good guys, the good guys, or the bad guys ? Mrs. Clinton and her boss tossed their support to the bad guys, who took over Egypt and sold the bad guys aka Islamic Jihad weapons, these guys have murdered scores of fellow American citizens and thousands who did not Kiss their Ass., Thank God for the Citizen’s of Egypt, they gave Mrs. Clinton and her Boss the “MIDDLE FINGER”, and took down Islamic Jihad. Oh O’Bumma is still fuming. Than there is Libya who daffy-duck its leader is and was a cold blooded Killer, he could be controlled and you had a some what stable nation in that region, but not now, it also is split and broken and torn by civil war and unrest, just look at what happened last week when the boat sank containing refugees fleeing Libya and the region, all , because; of Mrs. Clinton and her lack of Leadership along with her Boss !

  19. Jerry Cox says

    WOW! 38% still believe anything she says or is it they just don’t care. Better yet, the Liberal left would not know the truth if it bit them in the A__! The LGBT crowd is all in for she is one of them from everything I have read and heard. I still can’t get 38% . I guess you have to put a lot of women in there just because she is Women and they care about the real issues anyway as long it is a democrat.

    1. shafawn says

      1. Illegal aliens and minorities hoping to get something for nothing
      2. LGBT
      3. People who want recreational marijuana legalized nationwide.
      4. Younger voters who are still in the rebellious give me whatever I want stage of life.
      – University students who have been brain washed by radical left professors.

      I don’t want to believe ‘women’ are to blame for that statistic because women are not that stupid.

      1. Jerry Cox says

        Thanks for your reply. Many of my best friends are women and I love them like I would my sister. I appreciate your response, I really do. There had been an interview done on the streets asking why they would vote for Hillary and they just said because she was a woman. I figured they must somehow be part of the 38% referenced not all women because I believe you constitute about 50% anyway. Again thanks and I can see you are much smarter than that just by your great response.

        1. shafawn says

          Aww you’re a sweet guy. Thank you for that kind reply.

        2. preacher bill says

          Everyone needs to know about this vulgar women, don’t refer her as the first lady, she never was a lady in my book when she and Bill occupied the WH. As a navy vet , I never heard such language as she uses on ship or in barracks. She is so false, She laughs when nothing is funny. If I have ever witness a fraud, she takes the cake

  20. shafawn says

    Heh.. the Clintons are the reason I switched to Republican in the first place. No I don’t believe a single solitary word that comes out of her mouth.

    1. Mike with the Silver Star says

      Probably why Reagan abandoned the democrat party way back when…..

  21. zoehoney says

    She needs to be investigated for lots of things before she gets too far into the race for President. Selling Uranium to USSR for money should seal the deal for them BOTH. I do feel Gowdy has lots on her and will hold the evidence long enough just to be SURE she has no chance on running. The Clintons are scum of the earth. I cannot beleive how DIRTY liberals are in general. All about money and power it is really sick how bad Washington REALLY is. No one cares about those that put them in high positions.

    1. GodBlessRealAmerica!!! says

      CROOKED EVIL LIBERAL LYING DISGUSTING MSNBC & CNN AND HILLARY ALL LIARS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  22. ONLYJB1 says

    NO Americans are buying it! The Russians are and then they are selling it to Iran! It’s called uranium!

  23. Dennis Derstine says

    We need common sense, everyone with a brain knows it. Also everyone with a brain knows it will not happen under current conditions.
    For over 50 yrs cash has been thrown at the war on poverty. More people than ever are in poverty. Now we are bringing in more poverty from all nations via Mexico. Increase the voter base, and keep throwing free money to your power base. How can it not work?
    Keep your campaign money, no term limits, pensions for all. The elite in this nation don’t care and never will until we screw with their money.
    Bernie Madoff learned that lesson the hard way, you screw the middle class no one cares. You screw the wealthy and there is hell to pay.
    Conservatism and personal accoutability, these NEVER go out of style.

  24. Marilyn Stern says

    Millions thought that it was time for a black president. Now millions think it is time for a woman president. Being black and/or being a woman now appears to be at the top of the list of qualifications needed to run for president of the United States.

    Wish all the Republican, Conservative, Libertarian, Tea Party members would get their bloated egos in check and coalesce. We need a woman to run against Clinton (or Warren) and the Republican party has no shortage of INTELLIGENT, WELL VERSED AND WELL QUALIFIED women. They just need to pick one and get solidly behind her. If their egos will not allow them to back a woman then pick one man and get solidly behind him and please, please, do a lot better than Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and Mike Huckabee, to name just a few of the men clawing at each other for a chance to become the Republican nominee. The Democrats marching in lock step have put them in solid control and we should learn from this. Splitting the conservative party has lost us many an election. Voting Libertarian in an attempt to make a statement that was virtually ignored lost the election for Romney. Voter fraud was rampant but those votes would have won the election.

  25. Terry Hamblin says

    The Dems. want to be known as the party that put the first black in the White House and subsequently the first woman. They don’t care that neither of them is worth the powder to blow a fart!

  26. ArmyCombatVet says

    What this poll shows if accurate is that 38% of Americans (traitors and complicit morons) are either too stupid to read, flat out hate America or the poll or polls are highly manipulated falsifying the results! Even the Communist NY Times has had it with the disgusting overtly criminal witch! Her and her husband or whatever they are, are the two most felonious and traitorous trailer trash in American history. The fact that this vile couple were born in America, is the only thing that differentiates them from the failed muslim test tube experiment in the White House!

  27. real talk 1 says

    How come people like Hillary Clinton don’t care enough that america has had enough give America a break they have made their money off the backs of the taxpayers we have grown weary of lies cheating scandals stealing don’t people know when to quit . America don’t need a hero we need a break all you old timers have had your day now let us be go and enjoy your stolen wealth and take your family and friends with you if all these years you haven’t made a change for the good why now Please go far away from America !!

  28. RMCSRET says

    I honestly cant see why anyone would trust this woman as our President let alone a run for Dog Catcher.
    Just look what she and her Husband did during there stay in the White House and her stint in congress
    and as the Secretary of State. If this alone doesn’t tell you she is not qualified for the Presidency well then
    something is very wrong.

  29. Hal Flagel says

    If America elects this —– Look for a screwed up election system….

  30. Gregory Stafford says

    It would be nice if the truth, and the law, finally caught up with the Clintons.

  31. Ken Trefaller says

    Our problem is not Hillary or Obama it is the 50% that votes for them and the new Dems by amnesty. Call your Conressman. If you don’tyou are part of the problem.

  32. jim marcum says

    she just might be a shape shifter, her skin certainly looks reptilian. I just don’t think a reptile would be caught dead wearing those pant suits.

  33. hora says

    First all poll no one trust when communist are in control, and second last election was show a real face where stand Communist, after over six years of atrocity and abuse dems loose support and go down, and be will to luck if not get prosecution for corruption and treason, Dems must loose political right.

  34. Bob Stewart says

    I wish that I could believe that the public would turn against Hillary, but the same idiots that voted for Obama will vote for Hillary. And they usually vote 125% of the registered voters too. Most of Hillary’s supporters are crooks and thieves, just like Bill and Hillary.

  35. Alleged Comment says

    I am beyond this ridiculous discussion about your so-called leaders.

    I believe like the Walrus said, “the time has come the Walrus said”, TO PELT THEM WITH EGGS!!

    1. retona4 says

      Go do that. Enjoy your stint in prison.

      1. Alleged Comment says

        Another Hillary worshiper. The point of pelting them with eggs is so that we don’t end up hanging them!

        We really are nice people. But don’t PUSH US!

        1. retona4 says

          Multiple personality disorder? How sad.

          1. Alleged Comment says

            You have to fight progressives fire with fire. LOL! Gimme some more, love it!

  36. Becky says

    I don’t know how this lying SOS ever got elected to a public office. Or her lying SOS ‘husband’ for that matter. From the get-go they have lied. And continue to. Why are people so bloody brain dead they ACCEPT this behavior?

    1. jim marcum says

      that seems to be our major problem Becky. brain dead voters voting for the lowest form of life on our planet.

      1. Becky says

        Succinctly and perfectly summarized Jim.

  37. jim marcum says

    Putin will bitch slap her, throw her across his desk and give her a good old fashioned f–king. Is that what you folks want for the leader of the free world.

  38. jim scofield says

    It is strange that none of the media is saying much
    about the body count associated with the Clintons
    it is up to 47.

  39. marilyn says

    WELL AMERICA THE CHIPS ARE DOWN,CAN WE FIND THAT LEADER,THAT PERSON WHO,WILL PUT THE ZING BACK IN OUR FREEDOM,WE HAVE PAYED TO HIGH A PRICE TO LET THESE WEASELS
    IN WASHINGTON SELL OUR COUNTRY OUT TO THE ENEMY.I HEAR THE MOANS OF THE DEAD SOLDIERS WHO PAID THE PRICE FOR FREEDOM,WON’T YOU HONOR WHOSE FALLEN HEROS’ BY
    VOTEING FOR AMERICA, ,NOT MUSLIMS THAT ARE PEOPLE WHO WISH US DEAD.

  40. adrianvance says

    The Clintons belong in jail and if they do not go there we will know the country is totally corrupt.

    Google “Two Minute Conservative” for clarity.

  41. bdcorvette says

    We do not buy what she is selling because she continues to step in what she is selling. When I do that I have to scrape my shoes off.

  42. jreg9304 says

    about time America, i seriously hope that all are waking up and seeing trash for what it really is. H. Clinton is just that, trash in every way you look at it. she is a liar, thief, deviot and a female scoundrel. very ugly in mind body and soul and not at all good for America.

  43. beowulf32 says

    And the body count is??

    This is what happens when you mess with the Clinton’s!!

    And in case you have forgotten all the other bodies this witch has left in her wake……Just a quick refresher course ‘lest we forget’ what has happened to many “friends” of the Clintons.

    1- James McDougal – Clintons convicted Whitewater partner died of an apparent heart attack, while in solitary confinement. He was a key witness in Ken Starr’s investigation.
    2 – Mary Mahoney – A former White House intern was murdered July 1997 at a Starbucks Coffee Shop in Georgetown .. The murder happened just after she was togo public w:th her story of sexual harassment in the White House.
    3 – Vince Foster – Former White House councilor, and colleague of Hillary Clinton at Little Rock’s Rose Law firm. Died of a gunshot wound to the head, ruled a suicide.
    4 – Ron Brown – Secretary of Commerce and former DNC Chairman. Reported to have died by impact in a plane crash. A pathologist close to the investigation reported that there was a hole in the top of Brown’s skull resembling a gunshot wound. At the time of his death Brown was being investigated, and spoke publicly of his willingness to cut a deal with prosecutors. The rest of the people on the plane also died. A few days later the air Traffic controller commited suicide.
    5 – C. Victor Raiser, II – Raiser, a major player in the Clinton fund raising organization died in a private plane crash in July 1992.
    6 – Paul Tulley – Democratic National Committee Political Director found dead in a hotelroom in Little Rock , September 1992. Described by Clinton as a “dear friend and trusted advisor”.
    7 – Ed Willey – Clinton fundraiser, found dead November 1993 deep in the woods in VA of a gunshot wound to the head. Ruled a suicide. Ed Willey died on the same day his wife Kathleen Willey claimed Bill Clinton groped her in the oval office in the White House. Ed Willey was involved in several Clinton fund raising events.
    8 – Jerry Parks – Head of Clinton’s gubernatorial security team in Little Rock .. Gunned down in his car at a deserted intersection outside Little Rock Park’s son said his father was building a dossier on Clinton He allegedly threatened to reveal this information. After he died the files were mysteriously removed from his house.
    9 – James Bunch – Died from a gunshot suicide. It was reported that he had a “Black Book” of people which contained names of influential people who visited prostitutes in Texas and Arkansas
    10 – James Wilson – Was found dead in May 1993 from an apparent hanging suicide. He was reported to have ties to Whitewater..
    11 – Kathy Ferguson – Ex-wife of Arkansas Trooper Danny Ferguson, was found dead in May 1994, in her living room with a gunshot to her head. It was ruled a suicide even though there were several packed suitcases, as if she were going somewhere. Danny Ferguson was a co-defendant along with Bill Clinton in the Paula Jones lawsuit Kathy Ferguson was a possible corroborating witness for Paula Jones.
    12 – Bill Shelton – Arkansas State Trooper and fiancee of Kathy Ferguson. Critical of the suicide ruling of his fiancee, he was found dead in June, 1994 of a gunshot wound also ruled a suicide at the grave site of his fiancee.
    13 – Gandy Baugh – Attorney for Clinton’s friend Dan Lassater, died by jumping out a window of a tall building January, 1994. His client was a convicted drug distributor.
    14 – Florence Martin – Accountant & sub-contractor for the CIA, was related to the Barry Seal, Mena, Arkansas, airport drug smuggling case. He died of three gunshot wounds.
    15 – Suzanne Coleman – Reportedly had an affair with Clinton when he was Arkansas Attorney General. Died of a gunshot wound to the back of the head, ruled a suicide. Was pregnant at the time of her death.
    16 – Paula Grober – Clinton’s speech interpreter for the deaf from 1978 until her death December 9, 1992. She died in a one car accident.
    17 – Danny Casolaro – Investigative reporter. Investigating MenaAirport and Arkansas Development Finance Authority. He slit his wrists, apparently, in the middle of his investigation.
    18 – Paul Wilcher – Attorney investigating corruption at MenaAirport with Casolaro and the 1980 “October Surprise” was found dead on a toilet June 22, 1993, in his WashingtonDC apartment. Had delivered a report to Janet Reno 3 weeks before his death.
    19 – Jon Parnell Walker – Whitewater investigator for Resolution Trust Corp. Jumped to his death from his Arlington , Virginia apartment balcony August 15, 1993. He was investigating the Morgan Guaranty scandal.
    20 – Barbara Wise – Commerce Department staffer. Worked closely with Ron Brown and John Huang. Cause of death unknown. Died November 29, 1996. Her bruised, nude body was found locked in her office at the Department of Commerce.
    21 – Charles Meissner – Assistant Secretary of Commerce who gave John Huang special security clearance, died shortly thereafter in a small plane crash.
    22 – Dr. Stanley Heard – Chairman of the National Chiropractic Health Care Advisory Committee died with his attorney Steve Dickson in a small plane crash. Dr. Heard, in addition to serving on Clinton ‘s advisory council personally treated Clinton’s mother, stepfather and brother.
    23 – Barry Seal – Drug running TWA pilot out of Mena Arkansas, death was no accident.
    24 – Johnny Lawhorn, Jr. – Mechanic, found a check made out to Bill Clinton in the trunk of a car left at his repair shop. He was found dead after his car had hit a utility pole.
    25 – Stanley Huggins – Investigated Madison Guaranty. His death was a purported suicide and his report was never released.
    26 – Hershell Friday – Attorney and Clinton fundraiser died March 1, 1994, when his plane exploded.
    27 – Kevin Ives & Don Henry – Known as “The boys on the track” case. Reports say the boys may have stumbled upon the Mena Arkansas airport drug operation. A controversial case, the initial report of death said, due to falling asleep on railroad tracks. Later reports claim the 2 boys had been slain before being placed on the tracks. Many linked to the case died before their testimony could come before a Grand Jury.

    THE FOLLOWING PERSONS HAD INFORMATION ON THE IVES/HENRY CASE:
    28 – Keith Coney – Died when his motorcycle slammed into the back of a truck, 7/88.
    29 – Keith McMaskle – Died, stabbed 113 times, Nov, 1988
    30 – Gregory Collins – Died from a gunshot wound January 1989.
    31 – Jeff Rhodes – He was shot, mutilated and found burned in a trash dump in April 1989.
    32 – James Milan – Found decapitated. However, the Coroner ruled his death was due to natural causes”.
    33 – Jordan Kettleson – Was found shot to death in the front seat of his pickup truck in June 1990.
    34 – Richard Winters – A suspect in the Ives/Henry deaths. He was killed in a set-up robbery July 1989.

    THE FOLLOWING CLINTON BODYGUARDS ARE DEAD
    35 – Major William S. Barkley, Jr.
    36 – Captain Scott J . Reynolds
    37 – Sgt. Brian Hanley
    38 – Sgt. Tim Sabel
    39 – Major General William Robertson
    40 – Col. William Densberger
    41 – Col. Robert Kelly
    42 – Spec. Gary Rhodes
    43 – Steve Willis
    44 – Robert Williams
    45 – Conway LeBleu
    46 – Todd McKeehan

    And let’s not forget ?#?Bengazi?

    Quite an impressive list!
    The public must become aware of what happens to friends of the Clintons!

    HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT?
    …SURELY YOU JEST!

    1. Mark Clemens says

      Your thread answers the Head Line Question. Hillary is selling death……

  44. nmasterson says

    This just goes to show that the masses are asses. They don’t believe a word she is saying, they consider her a chronic liar and yet 60% think she has good leadership skills. Give me a break!

  45. T. Copps says

    That’s because the old hag is selling bull sh*t.. we have more than enough of that already!

  46. Shauna says

    The article I just copied is a bit long but will detail just how crooked shillery and her ilk are…..Looks like ole George Soros has his hands in this as well: Going to have to post in two parts, it’s too big…

    In a shocking story, broken by none other than the NY Times, it is being reported that the Clinton Foundation received steady cash payments as Russians pressed for and got control of a uranium mining company.

    I recently wrote a piece on the long list of dead bodies linked to the Clintons, during their many years on the political stage in the U.S. It seems that now we can add a scandal exposing the Clintons as traitors and thieves.

    Sleeping with the enemy does not go over well — not even with those who would have Hillary Clinton as the next president. The Clintons are professional criminals. They have made it through their scandals unscathed. Perhaps this is the SCANDAL of scandals, which will finally bring down the Clinton empire. If justice is served, Bill and Hillary Clinton will spend the rest of their lives in a prison.

    The headline in Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when the newspaper served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”

    The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

    But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

    Hillary Clinton’s State Department was part of a panel that approved the sale of one of America’s largest uranium mines at the same time a foundation controlled by the seller’s chairman was making donations to a Clinton family charity, records reviewed by The Wall Street Journal show.

    At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

    Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

    As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

    And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.

    At the time, both Rosatom and the United States government made promises intended to ease concerns about ceding control of the company’s assets to the Russians. Those promises have been repeatedly broken, records show.

    The New York Times’s examination of the Uranium One deal is based on dozens of interviews, as well as a review of public records and securities filings in Canada, Russia and the United States. Some of the connections between Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation were unearthed by Peter Schweizer, a former fellow at the right-leaning Hoover Institution and author of the forthcoming book “Clinton Cash.” Mr. Schweizer provided a preview of material in the book to The Times, which scrutinized his information and built upon it with its own reporting.

    Whether the donations played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical challenges presented by the Clinton Foundation, headed by a former president who relied heavily on foreign cash to accumulate $250 million in assets even as his wife helped steer American foreign policy as secretary of state, presiding over decisions with the potential to benefit the foundation’s donors.

    In a statement, Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign, said no one “has ever produced a shred of evidence supporting the theory that Hillary Clinton ever took action as secretary of state to support the interests of donors to the Clinton Foundation.” He emphasized that multiple United States agencies, as well as the Canadian government, had signed off on the deal and that, in general, such matters were handled at a level below the secretary. “To suggest the State Department, under then-Secretary Clinton, exerted undue influence in the U.S. government’s review of the sale of Uranium One is utterly baseless,” he added.

    American political campaigns are barred from accepting foreign donations. But foreigners may give to foundations in the United States. In the days since Mrs. Clinton announced her candidacy for president, the Clinton Foundation has announced changes meant to quell longstanding concerns about potential conflicts of interest in such donations; it has limited donations from foreign governments, with many, like Russia’s, barred from giving to all but its health care initiatives. That policy stops short of Mrs. Clinton’s agreement with the Obama administration, which prohibited all foreign government donations while she served as the nation’s top diplomat.

    Either way, the Uranium One deal highlights the limits of such prohibitions. The foundation will continue to accept contributions from foreign individuals and businesses whose interests, like Uranium One’s, may overlap with those of foreign governments, some of which may be at odds with the United States.

    When the Uranium One deal was approved, the geopolitical backdrop was far different from today’s. The Obama administration was seeking to “reset” strained relations with Russia. The deal was strategically important to Mr. Putin, who shortly after the Americans gave their blessing sat down for a staged interview with Rosatom’s chief executive, Sergei Kiriyenko. “Few could have imagined in the past that we would own 20 percent of U.S. reserves,” Mr. Kiriyenko told Mr. Putin.

    Now, after Russia’s annexation of Crimea and aggression in Ukraine, the Moscow-Washington relationship is devolving toward Cold War levels, a point several experts made in evaluating a deal so beneficial to Mr. Putin, a man known to use energy resources to project power around the world.

    “Should we be concerned? Absolutely,” said Michael McFaul, who served under Mrs. Clinton as the American ambassador to Russia but said he had been unaware of the Uranium One deal until asked about it. “Do we want Putin to have a monopoly on this? Of course we don’t. We don’t want to be dependent on Putin for anything in this climate.”

    Donations to the Clinton Foundation, and a Russian Uranium Takeover

    The path to a Russian acquisition of American uranium deposits began in 2005 in Kazakhstan, where the Canadian mining financier Frank Giustra orchestrated his first big uranium deal, with Mr. Clinton at his side. Uranium investors’ efforts to buy mining assets in Kazakhstan and the United States led to a takeover bid by a Russian state-owned energy company. The investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation over the same period, while Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s office was involved with approving the Russian bid.

    The two men had flown aboard Mr. Giustra’s private jet to Almaty, Kazakhstan, where they dined with the authoritarian president, Nursultan A. Nazarbayev. Mr. Clinton handed the Kazakh president a propaganda coup when he expressed support for Mr. Nazarbayev’s bid to head an international elections monitoring group, undercutting American foreign policy and criticism of Kazakhstan’s poor human rights record by, among others, his wife, then a senator.

    Within days of the visit, Mr. Giustra’s fledgling company, UrAsia Energy Ltd., signed a preliminary deal giving it stakes in three uranium mines controlled by the state-run uranium agency Kazatomprom.

    If the Kazakh deal was a major victory, UrAsia did not wait long before resuming the hunt. In 2007, it merged with Uranium One, a South African company with assets in Africa and Australia, in what was described as a $3.5 billion transaction. The new company, which kept the Uranium One name, was controlled by UrAsia investors including Ian Telfer, a Canadian who became chairman. Through a spokeswoman, Mr. Giustra, whose personal stake in the deal was estimated at about $45 million, said he sold his stake in 2007.

    Soon, Uranium One began to snap up mining companies with assets in the United States. In April 2007, it announced the purchase of a uranium mill in Utah and more than 38,000 acres of uranium exploration properties in four Western states, followed quickly by the acquisition of the Energy Metals Corporation and its uranium holdings in Wyoming, Texas and Utah. That deal made clear that Uranium One was intent on becoming “a powerhouse in the United States uranium sector with the potential to become the domestic supplier of choice for U.S. utilities,” the company declared.

    Still, the company’s story was hardly front-page news in the United States — until early 2008, in the midst of Mrs. Clinton’s failed presidential campaign, when The Times published an article revealing the 2005 trip’s link to Mr. Giustra’s Kazakhstan mining deal. It also reported that several months later, Mr. Giustra had donated $31.3 million to Mr. Clinton’s foundation.

    Though the article quoted the former head of Kazatomprom, Moukhtar Dzhakishev, as saying that the deal required government approval and was discussed at a dinner with the president, Mr. Giustra insisted that it was a private transaction, with no need for Mr. Clinton’s influence with Kazakh officials. He described his relationship with the former American president as motivated solely by a shared interest in philanthropy.

    As if to underscore the point, five months later Mr. Giustra held a fund-raiser for the Clinton Giustra Sustainable Growth Initiative, a project aimed at fostering progressive environmental and labor practices in the natural resources industry, to which he had pledged $100 million. The star-studded gala, at a conference center in Toronto, featured performances by Elton John and Shakira and celebrities like Tom Cruise, John Travolta and Robin Williams encouraging contributions from the many so-called F.O.F.s — Friends of Frank — in attendance, among them Mr. Telfer. In all, the evening generated $16 million in pledges, according to an article in The Globe and Mail.

    “None of this would have been possible if Frank Giustra didn’t have a remarkable combination of caring and modesty, of vision and energy and iron determination,” Mr. Clinton told those gathered, adding: “I love this guy, and you should, too.”

    But what had been a string of successes was about to hit a speed bump.

  47. Shauna says

    Part 2: continuing from the post below…..This is a copied post but some of this information is astonishing.
    *********************************************

    Arrest and Progress

    By June 2009, a little over a year after the star-studded evening in Toronto, Uranium One’s stock was in free-fall, down 40 percent. Mr. Dzhakishev, the head of Kazatomprom, had just been arrested on charges that he illegally sold uranium deposits to foreign companies, including at least some of those won by Mr. Giustra’s UrAsia and now owned by Uranium One.

    Publicly, the company tried to reassure shareholders. Its chief executive, Jean Nortier, issued a confident statement calling the situation a “complete misunderstanding.” He also publicly contradicted Mr. Giustra’s contention that the uranium mining deal had not required government blessing. “When you do a transaction in Kazakhstan, you need the government’s approval,” he said, adding that UrAsia had indeed received that approval.

    But privately, Uranium One officials were worried they could lose their joint mining ventures. American diplomatic cables made public by WikiLeaks also reflect concerns that Mr. Dzhakishev’s arrest was part of a Russian power play for control of Kazakh uranium assets.

    At the time, Russia was already eying a stake in Uranium One, Rosatom company documents show. Rosatom officials say they were seeking to acquire mines around the world because Russia lacks sufficient domestic reserves to meet its own industry needs.

    It was against this backdrop that the Vancouver-based Uranium One pressed the American Embassy in Kazakhstan, as well as Canadian diplomats, to take up its cause with Kazakh officials, according to the American cables.

    “We want more than a statement to the press,” Paul Clarke, a Uranium One executive vice president, told the embassy’s energy officer on June 10, the officer reported in a cable. “That is simply chitchat.” What the company needed, Mr. Clarke said, was official written confirmation that the licenses were still valid.

    The American Embassy ultimately reported to the secretary of state, Mrs. Clinton. Though the Clarke cable was copied to her, it was given wide circulation, and it is unclear if she would have read it; the Clinton campaign did not address questions about the cable.

    What is clear is that the embassy acted, with the cables showing that the unnamed energy officer met with Kazakh officials to discuss the issue on June 10 and 11.

    Three days later, a wholly owned subsidiary of Rosatom completed a deal for 17 percent of Uranium One. And within a year, the Russian government would substantially up the ante, with a generous offer to shareholders that would give it a 51 percent controlling stake. But first, Uranium One had to get the American government to sign off on the deal.

    The Power to Say No

    When a company controlled by the Chinese government sought a 51 percent stake in a tiny Nevada gold mining operation in 2009, it set off a secretive review process in Washington, where officials raised concerns primarily about the mine’s proximity to a military installation, but also about the potential for minerals at the site, including uranium, to come under Chinese control. The officials killed the deal.

    Such is the power of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States. The committee comprises some of the most powerful members of the cabinet, including the attorney general, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy, and the secretary of state. They are charged with reviewing any deal that could result in foreign control of an American business or asset deemed important to national security.

    The national security issue at stake in the Uranium One deal was not primarily about nuclear weapons proliferation; the United States and Russia had for years cooperated on that front, with Russia sending enriched fuel from decommissioned warheads to be used in American nuclear power plants in return for raw uranium. Instead, it concerned American dependence on foreign uranium sources. While the United States gets one-fifth of its electrical power from nuclear plants, it produces only around 20 percent of the uranium it needs, and most plants have only 18 to 36 months of reserves, according to Marin Katusa, author of “The Colder War: How the Global Energy Trade Slipped From America’s Grasp.”

    “The Russians are easily winning the uranium war, and nobody’s talking about it,” said Mr. Katusa, who explores the implications of the Uranium One deal in his book. “It’s not just a domestic issue but a foreign policy issue, too.”

    When ARMZ, an arm of Rosatom, took its first 17 percent stake in Uranium One in 2009, the two parties signed an agreement, found in securities filings, to seek the foreign investment committee’s review. But it was the 2010 deal, giving the Russians a controlling 51 percent stake, that set off alarm bells. Four members of the House of Representatives signed a letter expressing concern. Two more began pushing legislation to kill the deal.

    Senator John Barrasso, a Republican from Wyoming, where Uranium One’s largest American operation was, wrote to President Obama, saying the deal “would give the Russian government control over a sizable portion of America’s uranium production capacity.”

    “Equally alarming,” Mr. Barrasso added, “this sale gives ARMZ a significant stake in uranium mines in Kazakhstan.”

    Uranium One’s shareholders were also alarmed, and were “afraid of Rosatom as a Russian state giant,” Sergei Novikov, a company spokesman, recalled in an interview. He said Rosatom’s chief, Mr. Kiriyenko, sought to reassure Uranium One investors, promising that Rosatom would not break up the company and would keep the same management, including Mr. Telfer, the chairman. Another Rosatom official said publicly that it did not intend to increase its investment beyond 51 percent, and that it envisioned keeping Uranium One a public company

    Among the Donors to the Clinton Foundation

    Frank Giustra: $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more He built a company that later merged with Uranium One.

    Ian Telfer: $2.35 million. Mining investor who was chairman of Uranium One when an arm of the Russian government, Rosatom, acquired it.

    Paul Reynolds: $1 million to $5 million. Adviser on 2007 UrAsia-Uranium One merger. Later helped raise $260 million for the company.

    Frank Holmes: $250,000 to $500,000. Chief Executive of U.S. Global Investors Inc., which held $4.7 million in Uranium One shares in the first quarter of 2011.

    Neil Woodyer: $50,000 to $100,000. Adviser to Uranium One. Founded Endeavour Mining with Mr. Giustra.

    GMP Securities Ltd.: Donating portion of profits. Worked on debt issue that raised $260 million for Uranium One.

    American nuclear officials, too, seemed eager to assuage fears. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission wrote to Senator Barrasso assuring him that American uranium would be preserved for domestic use, regardless of who owned it.

    “In order to export uranium from the United States, Uranium One Inc. or ARMZ would need to apply for and obtain a specific NRC license authorizing the export of uranium for use reactor fuel,” the letter said.

    Still, the ultimate authority to approve or reject the Russian acquisition rested with the cabinet officials on the foreign investment committee, including Mrs. Clinton — whose husband was collecting millions of dollars in donations from people associated with Uranium One.

    Undisclosed Donations

    Before Mrs. Clinton could assume her post as secretary of state, the White House demanded that she sign a memorandum of understanding placing limits on her husband’s foundation’s activities. To avoid the perception of conflicts of interest, beyond the ban on foreign government donations, the foundation was required to publicly disclose all contributors.

    To judge from those disclosures — which list the contributions in ranges rather than precise amounts — the only Uranium One official to give to the Clinton Foundation was Mr. Telfer, the chairman, and the amount was relatively small: no more than $250,000, and that was in 2007, before talk of a Rosatom deal began percolating.

    But a review of tax records in Canada, where Mr. Telfer has a family charity called the Fernwood Foundation, shows that he donated millions of dollars more, during and after the critical time when the foreign investment committee was reviewing his deal with the Russians. With the Russians offering a special dividend, shareholders like Mr. Telfer stood to profit.

    His donations through the Fernwood Foundation included $1 million reported in 2009, the year his company appealed to the American Embassy to help it keep its mines in Kazakhstan; $250,000 in 2010, the year the Russians sought majority control; as well as $600,000 in 2011; and $500,000 in 2012. Mr. Telfer said that his donations had nothing to do with his business dealings, and that he had never discussed Uranium One with Mr. or Mrs. Clinton. He said he had given the money because he wanted to support Mr. Giustra’s charitable endeavors with Mr. Clinton. “Frank and I have been friends and business partners for almost 20 years,” he said.

    The Clinton campaign left it to the foundation to reply to questions about the Fernwood donations; the foundation did not provide a response.

    Mr. Telfer’s undisclosed donations came in addition to between $1.3 million and $5.6 million in contributions, which were reported, from a constellation of people with ties to Uranium One or UrAsia, the company that originally acquired Uranium One’s most valuable asset: the Kazakhstan mines. Without those assets, the Russians would have had no interest in the deal: “It wasn’t the goal to buy the Wyoming mines. The goal was to acquire the Kazakh assets, which are very good,” Mr. Novikov, the Rosatom spokesman, said in an interview.

    Amid this influx of Uranium One-connected money, Mr. Clinton was invited to speak in Moscow in June 2010, the same month Rosatom struck its deal for a majority stake in Uranium One.

    The $500,000 fee — among Mr. Clinton’s highest — was paid by Renaissance Capital, a Russian investment bank with ties to the Kremlin that has invited world leaders, including Tony Blair, the former British prime minister, to speak at its annual investor conference.

    Renaissance Capital analysts talked up Uranium One’s stock, assigning it a “buy” rating and saying in a July 2010 research report that it was “the best play” in the uranium markets. In addition, Renaissance Capital turned up that same year as a major donor, along with Mr. Telfer and Mr. Giustra, to a small medical charity in Colorado run by a friend of Mr. Giustra’s. In a newsletter to supporters, the friend credited Mr. Giustra with helping get donations from “businesses around the world.”

    A Renaissance Capital representative would not comment on the genesis of Mr. Clinton’s speech to an audience that included leading Russian officials, or on whether it was connected to the Rosatom deal. According to a Russian government news service, Mr. Putin personally thanked Mr. Clinton for speaking.

    A person with knowledge of the Clinton Foundation’s fund-raising operation, who requested anonymity to speak candidly about it, said that for many people, the hope is that money will in fact buy influence: “Why do you think they are doing it — because they love them?” But whether it actually does is another question. And in this case, there were broader geopolitical pressures that likely came into play as the United States considered whether to approve the Rosatom-Uranium One deal.

    Diplomatic Considerations

    If doing business with Rosatom was good for those involved with the Uranium One deal, engaging with Russia was also a priority of the incoming Obama administration, which was hoping for a new era of cooperation as Mr. Putin relinquished the presidency — if only for a term — to Dmitri A. Medvedev.

    “The assumption was we could engage Russia to further core U.S. national security interests,” said Mr. McFaul, the former ambassador.

    It started out well. The two countries made progress on nuclear proliferation issues, and expanded use of Russian territory to resupply American forces in Afghanistan. Keeping Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon was among the United States’ top priorities, and in June 2010 Russia signed off on a United Nations resolution imposing tough new sanctions on that country.

    Two months later, the deal giving ARMZ a controlling stake in Uranium One was submitted to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States for review. Because of the secrecy surrounding the process, it is hard to know whether the participants weighed the desire to improve bilateral relations against the potential risks of allowing the Russian government control over the biggest uranium producer in the United States. The deal was ultimately approved in October, following what two people involved in securing the approval said had been a relatively smooth process.

    Not all of the committee’s decisions are personally debated by the agency heads themselves; in less controversial cases, deputy or assistant secretaries may sign off. But experts and former committee members say Russia’s interest in Uranium One and its American uranium reserves seemed to warrant attention at the highest levels.

    “This deal had generated press, it had captured the attention of Congress and it was strategically important,” said Richard Russell, who served on the committee during the George W. Bush administration. “When I was there invariably any one of those conditions would cause this to get pushed way up the chain, and here you had all three.”

    And Mrs. Clinton brought a reputation for hawkishness to the process; as a senator, she was a vocal critic of the committee’s approval of a deal that would have transferred the management of major American seaports to a company based in the United Arab Emirates, and as a presidential candidate she had advocated legislation to strengthen the process.

    The Clinton campaign spokesman, Mr. Fallon, said that in general, these matters did not rise to the secretary’s level. He would not comment on whether Mrs. Clinton had been briefed on the matter, but he gave The Times a statement from the former assistant secretary assigned to the foreign investment committee at the time, Jose Fernandez. While not addressing the specifics of the Uranium One deal, Mr. Fernandez said, “Mrs. Clinton never intervened with me on any C.F.I.U.S. matter.”

    Mr. Fallon also noted that if any agency had raised national security concerns about the Uranium One deal, it could have taken them directly to the president.

    Anne-Marie Slaughter, the State Department’s director of policy planning at the time, said she was unaware of the transaction — or the extent to which it made Russia a dominant uranium supplier. But speaking generally, she urged caution in evaluating its wisdom in hindsight.

    “Russia was not a country we took lightly at the time or thought was cuddly,” she said. “But it wasn’t the adversary it is today.”

    That renewed adversarial relationship has raised concerns about European dependency on Russian energy resources, including nuclear fuel. The unease reaches beyond diplomatic circles. In Wyoming, where Uranium One equipment is scattered across his 35,000-acre ranch, John Christensen is frustrated that repeated changes in corporate ownership over the years led to French, South African, Canadian and, finally, Russian control over mining rights on his property.

    “I hate to see a foreign government own mining rights here in the United States,” he said. “I don’t think that should happen.”

    Mr. Christensen, 65, noted that despite assurances by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that uranium could not leave the country without Uranium One or ARMZ obtaining an export license — which they do not have — yellowcake from his property was routinely packed into drums and trucked off to a processing plant in Canada.

    Asked about that, the commission confirmed that Uranium One has, in fact, shipped yellowcake to Canada even though it does not have an export license. Instead, the transport company doing the shipping, RSB Logistic Services, has the license. A commission spokesman said that “to the best of our knowledge” most of the uranium sent to Canada for processing was returned for use in the United States. A Uranium One spokeswoman, Donna Wichers, said 25 percent had gone to Western Europe and Japan. At the moment, with the uranium market in a downturn, nothing is being shipped from the Wyoming mines.

    The “no export” assurance given at the time of the Rosatom deal is not the only one that turned out to be less than it seemed. Despite pledges to the contrary, Uranium One was eventually delisted from the Toronto Stock Exchange and taken private. As of 2013, Rosatom’s subsidiary, ARMZ, owned 100 percent of the company.” [1] – source

  48. brian James says

    go back to when her, husband and Vince Foster scam millions on the White Water scam and then when Vince was going to expose all he committed suicide and her staff was going through his condo before the police even new of his murder. she is and has always been a crook, why was she fired in the 70’s by her boss who said she was a lair and dishonest so he fired her. why is it that Americans lost all there brains when it comes to corrupt senators and congressmen who have done nothing for this nation but only filled there pockets with millions. the whole bunch of them need to be put in prison and take away all of there hidden accounts they have in off shore banks. Semper Fi

  49. OldPatriot32 says

    She’s to be ignored; when her lips move, she lies!

  50. Rick Rogers says

    Oh I am so going to enjoy then next 19 months or so.. This is going to be as much fun as watching Karl Rove’s Head explode on election night in 2012

  51. HankBar says

    Something smells about these poll numbers. 54% thinks she can not be trusted yet 62% like her leadership qualities ? Are you kidding me ? Every nasty detail of her scandals speaks directly to her leadership qualities or lack thereof.

  52. denniscerasoli says

    The fact of the matter is unless something goes down that prevents her from running she will in all probability win in 2016 because of her celebrity status alone that is how the majority of Democrats vote and they are the bigger party.Voting almost doesn’t matter anymore,when you put a person in power with a tract record of dishonesty why does voting matter?

  53. Dan says

    If she wins, by some miracle (or liberal blindness); I think it’s time to explore other lands!

  54. disqus_CeZmTpgh9W says

    I only wish there had been a sniper and he had not missed!

  55. jim scofield says

    You can bet that as soon as She found out about Benghazi
    She was busy scrubbing that server of anything that pertained
    to it. She has also scrubbed anything else that could possibly
    incriminate her worthless ass.

  56. GodBlessRealAmerica!!! says

    CROOKED LYING HILLARY what a disgrace!

    VOTE TRUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  57. skier69 says

    Her Arrogance is Astounding! She is in a Realm of Insanity! However No one Has been smart enough to take her down! Yet

    1. cutterguy says

      Trump can do it. IF he stays cool and calm as he asks about what we all know about her dealings. No guesses, just fact. He could send her over the top and let her go insane.

  58. GODBlessRealAmerica#1 says

    CROOKED EVIL LYING HILLARY IS LOSING HAHAHAHA

    Her Liberal Racist Nose just got bigger!!!

  59. george briar says

    hook them two clowns up to a lie detector and within minutes it would explode.

  60. Allan Zaug says

    When we all thought the Clintons were history, they seem to be pushing their daughter into politics. No doubt there out to see what else they can get from this country to increase their holdings. The good news though, In all the reports so far it seems she is following in her parents footsteps of lies, coverups and deceit.

  61. Chuck Lynch says

    Hillary was fired by Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, who was a staff attorney on the House Judiciary Committee investigating the Watergate break in.
    She is a totally dishonest person…..totally out for herself!!

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.