Trump Fires Acting AG For Stunning Insubordination

879

For a couple of hours, the big news on Monday evening was that Sally Yates, the acting attorney general, announced publicly that the Justice Department would not defend President Trump’s executive order on immigration and refugees. Yates penned a letter late in the day to DOJ lawyers telling them to let challenges to the White House order go unanswered.

“At present, I am not convinced that the defense of the executive order is consistent with these responsibilities, nor am I convinced that the executive order is lawful,” Yates wrote.

To say that such a letter is unusual would be an understatement. Not since 1973 has the head of the Justice Department defied the president in such clear and unambiguous terms. In that instance, Attorney General Elliot Richardson refused to obey President Richard Nixon’s order to fire special prosecutor Archibald Cox and was asked to resign as a result.

While the circumstances in 2017 are dissimilar to the “Saturday Night Massacre” of ’73 in many ways, Yates’s fate was that of Richardson’s. Only hours after Yates denounced Trump’s order, she was given a handwritten note: “The president has removed you from the office of Deputy Attorney General of the United States.”

Trump replaced Yates with U.S. Attorney Dana Boente, who said he would defend the president’s executive order banning immigrants from seven dangerous countries for 90 days.

In a statement, the White House said Yates had “betrayed” the Justice Department with a politically-motivated objection to the president’s order.

“Ms. Yates is an Obama administration appointee who is weak on borders and very weak on illegal immigration,” the statement said.

Democrats quickly portrayed Trump’s decision to fire Yates as a “chilling” triumph of politics over the law – which is, of course, the exact opposite of what actually happened.

The truth is that the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel had already approved the executive order with respect to its legality; Yates’s defiance was purely political. She made this clear in her letter, which made reference to earlier statements the White House had made and consternation over whether or not the order was “wise or just.” This wasn’t about the law; this was about Yates’s personal beliefs and her allegiance to Barack Obama.

It is true that the Justice Department must have some degree of independence and autonomy, but that doesn’t mean the president should sit idly by and watch his attorney general undermine his authority in the absence of legitimate cause. There was no such cause in this case, and Yates deserved to be fired.

 

879 Comments
  1. jgfsmf says

    Good. Maybe now people will see that their jobs are at stake, and if they don’t care about their jobs, then they need to quit before going against President Trump.

    1. annelouisegelinas says

      Exposed after 8 years Nixon must be laughing

    2. Rosie says

      Jgfsmf, Amen, Amen, Amen to that!!!!!!!!!

    3. Brenda Sinclair says

      I DO SO AGREE WITH YOU BUT I SEE NOW PRESIDENT TRUMP NEEDS TO FIRE ALL OF OBAMAS CABINET AND START OVER WITH PEOPLE WILLING TO UPHOLD THE CONSTITUTION https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/314b49d33b66c875e96e9f23dae8e74d76646e41661ceacca17afab122106953.jpg and laws of the land, but remember trump is good at saying you are fired you go president trump so proud of you

      1. pineapple says

        The high cost of illegals ($113 billion per year)

        It is no secret that the southern U.S. border is open, allowing
        thousands of people to pour into the country illegally. Ironically,
        Congressmen on both sides of the aisle in Washington are not inclined or
        don’t have the will to do anything about it. Although most support
        legal immigration, there are huge differences on how each side believes
        illegal immigrants and the security of our borders should be handled.

        Liberals
        generally support amnesty for those that enter the U.S. illegally.
        They also believe that ―undocumented immigrants‖ should have all the
        educational and health benefits that citizens receive including
        financial aid, welfare, social security, and Medicaid.

        Conservatives
        are against amnesty for those who enter the U.S. illegally. They
        believe that those who break the law by entering the U.S. illegally do
        not have the same rights as those who enter legally and obey the law.
        They also believe that the Federal Government should do a better job
        enforcing current immigration laws.

        Whether you call them
        ―illegal immigrants‖ or you call them ―undocumented immigrants, the
        undisputed fact remains that when a person crosses the border without
        the proper authority, he/she is breaking U.S. immigration law. Just to
        be clear, there may be some immigrants that had green cards (or other
        legal authority) that either did not renew or replace an expired or lost
        card. This would be analogous to someone who let their driver‘s
        license expire and then proceeded to drive a car. They would be doing
        so illegally. Nevertheless, to put all illegal immigrants into the
        undocumented immigrant category is ludicrous.

        It is estimated
        that there are between 11 and 30 million illegal immigrants in the
        country and that they account for 13.6% of all crime in the United
        States. No matter where you stand on this issue, the facts show that
        the direct and indirect financial costs are enormous. The following
        2013 statistics were extracted from the website fairus.org.1 Illegal
        immigration costs U.S. taxpayers about $113 billion a year at the
        federal, state and local level. Most of the costs (around $84 billion)
        are absorbed by state and local governments. That amounts to an average
        of $1,117 per household. The variance per household is higher or lower
        depending on the demographics of illegal alien populations. Education
        costs absorbed by state and local governments are estimated at $52
        billion annually. Although illegal immigrants that work are required to
        pay income tax, most don’t. Those that do get much of it refunded
        because they are in such a low income bracket.
        According to the
        Bureau of Economic Analysis, illegal immigrants residing in the U.S.
        send $50 billion back to their home countries each year.2 When you
        include legal immigrants, The World Bank estimates the amount to be $120
        billion.3 That is money that is not put back into the U.S. Economy.

        According
        to National Review, $1.87 billion was spent in 2014 on incarcerating
        illegal criminal immigrants.4 In 2009; the Department of Homeland
        Security estimated the percentage of illegal immigrants that are
        incarcerated to be between 11 and 15 percent of the country’s prison
        population.5 Almost all the financial burden was shouldered by the
        states. The State Criminal Alien Assistance Program (SCAAP), which is a
        federally funded program, does pay for some cost.6 However, it does
        not really matter because it all comes out of taxpayer dollars.

        The
        Government Accountability Office (GAO), using official Department of
        Justice data on criminal immigrants in the nation‘s correctional system,
        reported the following: – Between 2008 and 2014, 40% of all murder
        convictions in Florida were by criminal immigrants. In New York it was
        34% and Arizona 17.8%. In addition, during those years, criminal
        immigrants accounted for 38% of all murder convictions in the five
        states of California, Texas, Arizona, Florida and New York.7 That 38%
        represents 7,085 murders out of the total of 18,643.

        It gets
        worse: Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) removed (deported)
        235,413 criminal illegal immigrants nationwide in 2015, 49% percent of
        whom had previously been convicted of a criminal offense.8 Although the
        numbers are down since 2012, they are still substantial. Do the
        reduced numbers mean that there are less illegal immigrants coming into
        the country or does it mean that ICE has less resources to do their job
        or does it mean they are told to stand down? In 2013 and 2014 ICE set
        free more than 66,000 illegal immigrant criminals who had over
        166,000
        convictions (30,000 for drunk or drug impaired driving, 414
        kidnappings, over 11,000 rapes or other sexual assaults, and 395
        homicides).9 Since their release, many of those have already been
        convicted of new crimes including felonies.

        It gets worse: The
        invasion of illegal immigrants has established and empowered many in the
        form of street gangs. Their growth is fueled by money obtained easily
        through drug smuggling and sales. A 2011 FBI report makes many
        connections between the Mexican drug cartels and various U.S.based
        gangs.10 An out of hand financial and social disruption cost to
        American citizens just continues to grow.

        To make matters worse
        yet: Laws in sanctuary cities help shield illegal immigrants from
        deportation, despite astonishing statistics on violent crimes committed
        by illegal immigrants. These laws, in many cases, are in direct
        opposition to Federal immigration laws. Sadly, the U.S. Senate refuses
        to crack down on America‘s nearly 300 sanctuary cities.
        A 2014
        Reuters article stated that a Reuters/Ipsos poll showed that 70% of
        Americans are deeply worried that illegal immigration is threatening the
        nation‘s culture and economy.11 Concerns include job losses, the
        social landscape, how much insurance costs rise, and other related
        issues.
        Since illegal immigrants typically take low skill, low paying
        jobs, it would be logical to surmise that some portion of those jobs
        are being taken away from legal immigrants. When that happens, few good
        choices remain for them. They are usually left with the choice to go
        back to their home country, get some kind of aid, or enter a life of
        crime.

        Illegal immigration is totally out of control and our
        elected leaders know it. Securing the borders and fixing the illegal
        immigration problem should be demanded by the American people.
        Unfortunately, only about six percent of the population thinks it is a
        major problem (a sharp decline since 2014). They are either not aware
        of the enormity of the issue or they are more concerned about other
        issues.

        The social landscape is rapidly changing and it puts all
        legal citizens at risk for the security of their families and homes. As
        a consequence, it reduces their choices as to where they live, shop,
        and travel.

    4. AKLady says

      Rule of law was once how America was governed.
      As of January 20, America became a dictatorship ruled by a childish, ignorant bully.
      God help us.

      1. jgfsmf says

        God already did help us. That’s why Trump is president. I thought liberals didn’t believe in God. I thought since you love islamic terrorists, you would be praying to allah.

        1. AKLady says

          You pray to Allah.
          Allah is the Arabic word for God.

          All Arabic speakers, Jew, Christian and Muslim pray to Allah,
          the God of Abraham.

          You publish a huge amount of ignorance.
          With an Internet connection, why don’t you educate yourself?

          1. jgfsmf says

            Sorry hun. Allah, your god, is not my God. People who love terrorists don’t have my God. You don’t have God, so give up trying to show that you do. It’s just shows that you lie again.

          2. AKLady says

            The Aramaic word for “God” in the language of Assyrian Christians is ʼĔlāhā, or Alaha. Arabic-speakers of all Abrahamic faiths, including Christians and Jews, use the word “Allah” to mean “God”.

            http://www.dictionary.com/browse/allah http://www.charismanews.com/opinion/44453-should-christians-use-the-word-allah
            http://www.muslim.org/islam/allah.htm
            https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/Allah

            jgfsmf, it is you that lie. Satan is the patron of liars, so yes. your god is not my God.

          3. richardwfaith says

            The problem is that one of the two “Allahs” of discourse exhorts us to seek salvation and offers forgiveness and the other wants his followers to spread the SO-CALLED “religion” by force, conquest, taxation or beheading. If the “two” are indeed ONE, then by YOUR logic God must be schizophrenic. On the other hand, maybe, just maybe, these two “Allahs” evolved or morphed in two dramatically different directions.

          4. AKLady says

            Allah is the Arabic word for God. It is not the name of a god.

            It translates “One God”. Despite the Christian “schizophrenic” Father, Son and Holy Ghost, there is only one God.

            On page one of Genesis in the Old Testament, you will find find the word “Allah” seventeen times. “Allah” is the same word used by Christian Arabs and Jewish Arabs in their Bible, centuries before Islam came.

      2. Garys_opinion says

        Obama broke more laws, and violated the constitution more than any president since, well, since all of them.

        1. John Somers says

          PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND TO aklady, she FEEDS on this chit!! IF no one responds she has NO forum !

          1. Col C says

            Actually she provides a forum for the real truth to come out, and maybe someone else will read it, you never know.

          2. Fedup says

            I blocked her once but then she set up a new name. After asking her to provide proof of her idiotic statements, which she couldn’t, I got sick of her BS so I blocked her again. Such a big relief not to read her cut, paste, repeat crap!

          3. pineapple says

            I blocked her long ago.

        2. AKLady says

          In your opinion, however, the Congress and Supreme Court did not always agree with you. It is their opinion that counts,

      3. michael says

        It is obvious that you know nothing about president Trump. For now, please shut your mouth and give him a chance to do what he does. He is a true American who wants to give back to his country…and he’s doing it for free. Why can’t you help your country ?

        1. AKLady says

          Trump is an ignorant bigot.
          He violates the law repeatedly.
          Trump worships the god profit.
          he does not give a damn about America,

      4. Col C says

        Yes, on January 20, 2008, that pretty much sums it up, you are correct.

        1. Col C says

          Simple enough, in other words people should be responsible for themselves, charity should be voluntary not the responsibility of the government except in the case of veterans, and I might add get rid of the forced, government controlled ObamaCare tax, and the corrupt IRS to boot.

        2. richardwfaith says

          Suggestion: “Mandatory Drug Screening Before, During, and Throughout the Duration, of Welfare! (You know, they might actually be clean and sober while filing their applications, and then when they get OUR MONEY, STOLEN FROM US BY THE SO-CALLED “government”, they very soon start spending it ON DRUGS. This is some more of what seriously needs to be curtailed.)

      5. JMICHAEL270 says

        Rule of law was once how America was governed until the Muslim In Chief was elected.

        1. AKLady says

          U.S. Constitution, Amendment I

          CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAW RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION, OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

  2. Justin Seine says

    WTF? Someone in government actually being held accountable for dereliction of duty? I hope this is the beginning of trend. Usually they get put on paid vacation until the hoopla blows over. Say it again – “You’re F-I-R-E-D!!! GO TRUMP!

    https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/2e7a8bb6dbf8d30101e560b6d039fa2e94e020b1b376cbfbf9ead50d937e45ab.gif

    1. Dying America says

      I agree! Now, if Only the Republicans will get in the fight against the democrats and hold or vote for anything they so desire, Republicans, all you have to do is to say no! Not until You vote YES to all of DONALD TRUMPS NOMINEES!! Binsey traitor Graham are you listening? If you and John McShame are going to act like dems, then change your status to democrat! Neither one of you wants AMERICA TO WIN! YOU WANT PRESIDENT TRUMP TO BE A FAILURE AND YOU CANT IMAGINE HAVING OUR MONEY DRAINED FROM THE SWAMP!! I agree, say it louder, YOU ARE FIRED!!! Ahhhhhhh music to my ears after 8 long years of lies!!! GO PRESIDENT TRUMP, GO!! WE ARE WITH YOU AND SUPPORTING YOU WITH OUR PRAYERS!!! GO PRESIDENT TRUMP GOOOOOOOOO GET ‘EM!!!!!????

      1. AKLady says

        Yes, let’s paralyze the U.S. government.
        Just the excuse our enemies have been waiting for.

          1. richardwfaith says

            Your post is GGRRRRREEEAAAAAT, but it misses one very important point: soro$$$$$$ has hi$ $h!+ -hooks deeply embedded into the media also! It is important for ALL AMERICANS to fully understand the mechanics of how his evil agenda against our country works. Why the Hell hasn’t President Trump EXTRADITED this creep to Russia, where an arrest warrant awaits him? That would WORK, as opposed to the futility of going through courts and LOY-YIZZ, knowing full well that soro$$$$$$ has sufficient wealth to PURCHASE an entire LEGION of courts and LOY-YIZZ with a tiny fraction of it.
            .
            Synopsis of PRAGMATISM: “That which WORKS, is GOOD.”
            .
            Under obamA (who “INCIDENTALLY” is a puppet of soro$$$$$$), we were not “ALLOWED” to do anything that WORKS. Under President Trump, we are EXTRICATING ourselves from that MALARCHY, and YES, my spelling is very good. “Mal” means “BAD” and “-archy” means “RULE”. Malarchy is: BAD RULE.

    2. big KAhuna says

      Amen — now if only he could fire the Childish Dems in Congress/Senate. They are so childish
      And political and do not serve the majority of Americans desires. Let’s hope this angers the Trump voters to insure most Dems fighting for re election in 2018 get removed by a Republican ( adult).

      1. AKLady says

        Why do you lie?
        Soros has never been charged, tried or convicted for a crime.

        On the other hand, your Trump has been sued 180 times by the DOJ for discrimination.

        Illegal and terrorist voters???
        Fact, you must prove citizenship to register to vote.
        Fact, only registered voters may vote.

      2. richardwfaith says

        Just remember that none of President Trump’s GOODNESS is in any way due to the fact that he ran as a Republican. The top echelon of the Republican Party command hates him at least as much as the democRATs do. Thank God, he WON “over their dead bodies”! What will lead us into folly and error every time is failure to understand that we are suffering under a ONE-PARTY SYSTEM, whose two “heads” are the “two” part”ieS”, and which is owned outright and OPERATED by the Globalist CABAL. Hence, the GOODNESS of President Trump resides ENTIRELY in the fact that HE IS HIS OWN MAN.

        1. big KAhuna says

          Richard
          There is a lot of truth in your words. I believe most of us who voted for him where
          Fed up with the lieing/corrupt DC crowd. Also a big plus was the fact that he was already
          Rich and couldn’t be bought. He wasn’t a polished politician or part of the D.C. Establishment- a true outsider willing to take on the massive problems Obama left us with — just an average joe as the framers intended. He had ideas on how to fix the problems and his big ego/ work ethic would keep him on task. Above all he wasn’t caught up in the political correctness world that hides the truth. He don’t backdown and fires back at those who are trying to do him harm. The Alternative — Hildabeast wasn’t a possible option considering here constant lies/corruption, no vision, and offering to carry on Obamas dirty work. I predict that Trump will do more good for our country than all those before him. The amount of accomplishments in his first week are staggering and raises the Bar big time. Thank God and Donald Trump for turning it all around- we almost went over the edge (lost our country/freedoms). There is still a big smoking gun that must get addressed and fixed during his presidency– Muslims will never fit into our society they are brainwashed from birth to believe in the Koran ( Trash- it could never be the word of God it instructs them to kill all non Muslims — too corrosive and threatens our constitution/civilization). They must be sent back and the Koran must be Banned from all civilized societies. The new focus of our AG once in office should be to take down The world criminal Socialist George Sorros for Sedition/Treason – he is behind the corrupt Demonrat party and violent rallies etc etc.

          1. richardwfaith says

            BINGO!!!

          2. big KAhuna says

            Who’s responsible for Our problems?

            One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

            It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted — by present facts — of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can’t think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people.
            When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

            If the tax code is unfair, it’s because they want it unfair.
            If the budget is in the red, it’s because they want it in the red.
            If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it’s because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan …
            If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it’s because they want it that way.
            There are no insoluble government problems.

            Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power.

            Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like “the economy,” “inflation,” or “politics” that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

            Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible.
            They, and they alone, have the power.
            They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses, provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees…

            We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!
            Note this does not include the current POTUS and his Cabinet.

    3. Rosie says

      Couldn’t have said it better myself!!!!!

    4. Col C says

      Well, actually Obama fired a lot of people that disagreed with him, it just didn’t make the news, or they concocted some other reason for Obama letting them go, that agreed with the political ideology of the main stream news.

    5. Mary Muennig says

      Yes, he practiced!

    6. Eric Hartman says

      Insubordination! What are we a military dictatorship? It happens to be the AG’s duty to challenge the POTUS if there is a question of legality. Jeff Sessions (you remember, the dude tRump has nominated for AG) was VERY clear in that in the vetting of Sally Yates.

      1. InternetCensorsREvil says

        Ummmm – WRONG. It is the responsibility of SCOTUS to challenge the constitutionality of any law or presidential order. It is the responsibility of the Department of Justice AG to uphold/enforce ALL laws and presidential orders whether he/she agrees with them or not.

        1. Eric Hartman says

          ummmm- well not according to your boy’s boy Jeff Sessions grilling Sally Yates.
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3yDjylQ5Ps
          Come on! Use a little common sense. Shouldn’t the AG be able to tell the POTUS that an action is illegal in their opinion without fear of reprisal? Or maybe is it not illegal if the PRESIDENT does it aka Richard M. nixon? It is not a matter of agreeing, it’s a matter of LEGALITY. Sheesh.

          1. InternetCensorsREvil says

            I don’t care what Sessions or anyone else said. I gave the the constitutional facts. Period.

          2. Eric Hartman says

            From the Department of Justice itself,

            ORGANIZATION, MISSION & FUNCTIONS MANUAL: ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPUTY AND ASSOCIATE

            Attorney General | Deputy Attorney General | Associate Attorney General

            OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

            The position of Attorney General was created by the Judiciary Act of 1789. In June 1870 Congress enacted a law entitled “An Act to Establish the Department of Justice.” This Act established the Attorney General as head of the Department of Justice and gave the Attorney General direction and control of U.S. Attorneys and all other counsel employed on behalf of the United States. The Act also vested in the Attorney General supervisory power over the accounts of U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshals.

            The mission of the Office of the Attorney General is to supervise and direct the administration and operation of the Department of Justice, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Drug Enforcement Administration, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Bureau of Prisons, Office of Justice Programs, and the U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshals Service, which are all within the Department of Justice.

            The principal duties of the Attorney General are to:

            Represent the United States in legal matters.

            Supervise and direct the administration and operation of the offices, boards, divisions, and bureaus that comprise the Department.

            Furnish advice and opinions, formal and informal, on legal matters to the President and the Cabinet and to the heads of the executive departments and agencies of the government, as provided by law.

            Make recommendations to the President concerning appointments to federal judicial positions and to positions within the Department, including U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshals.

            Represent or supervise the representation of the United States Government in the Supreme Court of the United States and all other courts, foreign and domestic, in which the United States is a party or has an interest as may be deemed appropriate.

            Perform or supervise the performance of other duties required by statute or Executive Order.”

            If you can say this gives the AG authority to follow anybody or advise anybody to do an illegal act methinks you are a lemming. Period.

          3. Brenda Sinclair says

            GOOD INFO, BUT IF YATES SHOWED PROOF SHE COULD NOT BE LOYAL TO HER PRESIDENT THEN SHE NEEDED TO BE FIRES https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/57b5b69279cc8dca5bccf70808b63aaf606bf4afec07d2f9ca1ea40ab94a5eb1.jpg

          4. Progressive Republican says

            Muslims are not barred from entering or immigrating to the United States under the provisions of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act, or U.S. Code § 1182.

            It can be used now to exclude persons (both Muslims and non-Muslims) who have demonstrated an affiliation or sympathy with violent extremist groups professing Islamist motivations and goals (e.g., ISIL/Da’esh, al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, Boko Haram, etc.) from entering the U.S., but asserting that it enables a de facto ban on all Muslims is lacking in accuracy.

          5. InternetCensorsREvil says

            Potential terrorists ARE barred from entering this country. In fact, the Secretary of State can simply declare an entire country to be ‘non grata’ if he or she so chooses.

            NO ONE, not one single person on the face of this earth who isn’t already a US Citizen or legal resident, has the RIGHT to enter this country. If they come in it is because of our good graces and based upon the geo-political climate of the region from whence that person comes.

            If a supplicant wishes to enter this country and comes from a region where terrorist activity is rampant, they get rejected. If they happen to be muslim – tough. If the entire region happens to be muslim – tough.

            The US Constitution was deliberately written to be blind to religion. The president’s responsibility to safe guard this nation and the people who make up this nation is extended from the constitution.

            US Code 1182 does not override the president’s primary constitutional responsibilities – were it to attempt to do so, it would be unconstitutional in its entirety.

            Trumps EO bans ALL immigration from 7 nations, regardless of religion or race and so therefore does not violate 1182. It’s purpose is to allow the country to review our procedures to ensure that we can allow people in who will a) assimilate into our nation, b) who are not a threat to the peace and security of the legal residents and citizens of this country.

            Most importantly, it is not a permanent ban – it is a temporary hold.

          6. Progressive Republican says

            Not exactly a fan of sequiturs eh?

            Probably support der Schmuckenführer too.

          7. InternetCensorsREvil says

            I’m a fan of keeping terrorists out of this country. If it means we must inconvenience some people who have no right to any protection under the constitution to do it – then so be it.

            We are the United States of America, not the United States of the World.

          8. Progressive Republican says

            And still with the non sequiturs.

            And it’s ‘tinker’s dam’, idiot.

            FYT

          9. InternetCensorsREvil says

            I don’t give a crap how you want to spell it. You know EXACTLY what I meant.

            As for your non-english crap, the problem is bleeding heart liberals like to stick their noses into everyone’s business but don’t want to see the shitte they are standing in. Conclusion, we need a candidate who will do what is right, in spite of the butthurt snowflakes and do his job as defined by law and the constitution – thankfully, we got exactly that…AND he is beholdin’ to no one.

            The more people like you hate him, the more we can be sure he is doing the right thing.

            BTW, what’s with the oxymoronic moniker?

            Progressive Republican = RINO

          10. Progressive Republican says

            You’re too fucking stupid to deal with any more.

            Fuck.

            Off.

          11. Eric Hartman says

            So you are thinking just like tRump..in that he could shoot someone in the middle of 5th ave NYC and not lose any pol numbers? That he or HIS AG of any of HIS people can break the law?

          12. InternetCensorsREvil says

            No law has been broken

          13. Eric Hartman says

            Yes law has been broken

          14. InternetCensorsREvil says

            List the law which has been broken or admit you are a troll and take a hike.

          15. Eric Hartman says

            Are you really this ignorant? I already told you but you seem to have some kind of mental block.

          16. InternetCensorsREvil says

            No, you have not cited ANY law which Trump’s EO has broken nor have you cited the part of the constitution which the EO is supposed to have violated.

            You have stated that it is unconstitutional, or insinuated the same, that is NOT the same thing.

          17. Eric Hartman says

            So you disagree that the Constitution is the law of the land?

          18. InternetCensorsREvil says

            I do not. I have sworn an oath to protect the Constitution with my own blood if need be.

            I DO disagree that any of Trump’s Executive Orders is unconstitutional or breaks any federal laws. If you disagree with that, then tell me which ones you think it violates and we can have polite discourse on that.

          19. Eric Hartman says

            Very likely it is unconstitutional even though he tried to wrap it to disguise it as not being so,

            “However, a closer look at the executive order’s origins makes clear that it is a direct assault on the fundamental constitutional values of equal protection and religious freedom. How do we know this? Because Trump’s adviser, former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, told us so.

            Interviewed on Fox News on January 28, Giuliani explained how the administration’s immigration policy morphed from one that was obviously unconstitutional to one that is more subtly so. Host Jeanine Pirro asked, “Does the ban have anything to do with religion?” In response, Giuliani said, “When [Trump] first announced it, he said ‘Muslim ban.’ He called me up, he said, ‘Put a commission together, show me the right way to do it legally.’” “It,” in this case, of course, is a ban on Muslims. Giuliani’s admission is a textbook case of drafting an order in a way that avoids overt declaration of animus against a religious or ethnic group, while retaining the motive and much of the effect. Unfortunately for Trump, courts can see through this kind of rhetorical manipulation. Sally Yates, the former acting attorney general, certainly did. When she refused to enforce the executive order on Monday, she suggested statements made by the administration and its surrogates led her to believe the order was legally suspect. On Tuesday, a senior Justice Department official confirmed Giuliani’s comments were part of her decision.

            Federal courts have already begun to push back against the order, and their holdings suggest that they are on to Trump’s ruse as well. In California, Judge Dolly M. Gee ordered that Ali Khoshbakhti Vayeghan, a visa holder who had been deported from LAX to Dubai en route to Iran, be allowed to return to the United States, arguing that the order violated the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause and that it also constituted an “establishment” of religion, thus violating one of the two religion clauses of the First Amendment. In New York, Judge Ann M. Donnelly blocked the ban more broadly, granting temporary legal relief to multiple visa holders and refugees facing deportation, citing the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause and the right to due process. These legal arguments will eventually be considered in an appellate court and perhaps the Supreme Court. There, Giuliani’s statements could set the stage for a finding that the ruling is indeed based in animus and therefore a violation of the Equal Protection Clause, as these judges contend.”

            Bottom line, would it not have been better to get advice from the AG and other legal experts before firing said persons and being a bull in a China Shop? One can wrap a turd in either Christmas paper or Birthday paper, but it is still a turd.

          20. InternetCensorsREvil says

            “Very Likely?” So now you are back pedaling? Either it is or it is not. If it is, why didn’t the federal judge who ordered the stay declare it so and force Trump to take it to the Supreme Court?

            I’ll tell you why, it ISN’T unconstitutional. It wasn’t unconstitutional when Obama did it in 2011. It wasn’t unconstitutional when Clinton did it; nor was it unconstitutional when Carter did it. If any liberal judge DOES take that step, then they are also stating that Carter, Clinton and Obama were wrong as well.

            ANY attempt to connect a ruling of Trumps EO and the Establishment clause is purely judicial fiat. As for the Equal Protection Clause, while that applies to people living within our borders legally – refugees seeking entry into this country do not enjoy the protection of our Constitution.

            Now, I fully expect judges in California and New York to get on the band wagon. They are liberal courts and have a vested interest in seeing Trump fail. Regardless, a judge’s order, short of it being the Supreme Court, only impacts that courts jurisdiction.

            And who says he didn’t get a legal opinion from the Presidents Legal Counsel before doing so?

            What liberals don’t like about it is that it is a Republican who is doing it and he is making it stick.

          21. Eric Hartman says

            I hope you are prepared to eat your hat. Should I send salt and pepper? Maybe some green chile to make it more palatable?

          22. InternetCensorsREvil says

            I’m prepared to accept that a judge may attempt judicial fiat and will, undoubtedly, declare the EO unconstitutional. I doubt SCOTUS will agree; however, time will tell.

          23. Eric Hartman says

            Indeed, time will tell. So I guess that we can agree it is not cut and dried as of yet. I’ll accept that, thank you.

          24. Eric Hartman says

            Oh BTW. What tRump did is NOT the same as what Carter and Obama did. Perhaps you should do some independent research and not rely on propaganda? As your Moniker states, there is a lot of information. Seems you are capable of doing your own internal censoring without the help of outside evil forces. Have a lovely day. I’ve bigger fish to fry.

          25. InternetCensorsREvil says

            I’ve been doing nothing but research. I read what Obama and Carter did vis a vis stopping/slowing immigration to address an issue. I read what Clinton did vis a vis immigration reform.

            While there are some logistical differences in how the orders were to be carried out, the intent in all three cases, Trump, Obama, Carter, was to target the potential for terrorist incursion into the US from a region which is fraught with terrorists and terrorist organizations.

            The entire world can see what happens when liberals get their way with open borders simply by looking at the striff, chaos, crime in Germany and France as a result of those same policies. Is this what liberals want for this country? To rip it apart from the inside? To make it so their daughters and wives can’t safely walk the streets alone without fear of being gang raped?

            Here is the logical result of that kind of thinking – at least in this country and in most states – women are going to start concealed carry. Men are going to start patrolling the streets, armed. Those lovely ‘immigrants’ you are all so worried about offending? They are going to get shot the moment they even approach one of our women with anything that looks like intent to do harm.

          26. Eric Hartman says

            Quoting you, “while there are some logistical differences in how the orders were carried out” Good! That is the entire point I’m trying to make!!!! Wouldn’t you agree that those, what you call “logistical differences” make the difference in something being Constitutionally legal or not? In other words, instead of being the big bully bad ass and throwing his weight around and firing the very people that might could have helped him come up with a viable legal plan, he just had to be a big shot. He had to play reality TV and FIRE someone. As I said before, a bull in a China shop. As you properly stated, Obama and Carter have done similar. If I recall, Carter’s first try was deemed unconstitutional and WITH ADVICE he changed it. Why couldn’t Trump do the same or look at what had been done legally before?

            If I didn’t say it before now, I’ll say it before someone else misconstrues where I’m coming from. I am NOT a hillary fan. I’m not whining because “we lost”. I am very disappointed that Trump “won” just for these reasons. And we will see many more.

            All y’all seem to think that just anybody can get on a flying device or a boat and come here. That is WRONG. There currently is a long and involved process for refugees to get here. I’m not for “open borders” and I don’t think any reasonable person is, liberal or whatever persuasion. I do know some comments were taken out of context to propagandize this “open borders” BS. I don’t even want to get into that topic.

            To quote FDR, “We have nothing to fear but fear itself”. I’m not trying to downplay the problem, but there is a good way to go about thng and a bad way. IMHO, tRump is playing right into the hands of the “evil doers”. he is being their best recruiting tool. Turning in a country of vigilantes is not much of a solution either.

          27. InternetCensorsREvil says

            Wouldn’t you agree that those, what you call “logistical differences” make the difference in something being Constitutionally legal or not?

            In a word… No, I don’t agree. I agree that it COULD make the difference, if there were actually sufficient difference. Sadly for your, there is not. Which is why there are a lot of liberal judges making a lot of noise but not a one of them has stepped forward to slap an ‘unconstitutional’ sticker on it.

            In other words, instead of being the big bully bad ass and throwing his weight around and firing the very people that might could have helped him come up with a viable legal plan, he just had to be a big shot.

            Ummm, he is The President of the United States. That pretty much makes him the ‘tallest hog in the trough’. In other words, he IS a big shot.

            All y’all seem to think that just anybody can get on a flying device or a boat and come here. That is WRONG.

            DAYUM! Today just isn’t your day. Wrong again. People get on boats from Cuba and Haiti and float over here all the time. I don’t suppose you’ve been down in the Miami area recently? If you speak English, you are a minority.

            I’m not for “open borders” and I don’t think any reasonable person is, liberal or whatever persuasion.

            Well, I don’t think anyone can accuse any liberal of being reasonable. But then again, they would consider me unreasonable because I take a textualists view toward interpretation of the Constitution and what it means.

            The constitution charges the federal government with the protection of its people (provide for the national defense, I think are the exact words). The president swears an oath to uphold and defend the constitution.

            It is, therefore, only reasonable to walk the world with one’s eyes open, see the chaos and strife which are growing in Germany and France, who have a very open and permissive immigration policy, if you are from the middle east, and say, “Not on my watch will this happen here.” I say that all the time the difference is, the president can say that and actually do something about it and he has.

            The one thing in all this that everyone seems to forget is that outside of basic human rights, refugees have no, that is ZERO, right to protection under the US Constitution. If I am president and I don’t like people with brown hair and blue eyes and I can see a clear and present danger growing among people with those traits, I can instruct the government I lead to keep such persons out of my country until we have a way to determine WHICH people with brown hair and blue eyes are a danger to the people living here.

            And there isn’t a damned thing they or anyone else can say about it.

          28. Eric Hartman says

            “DAYUM! Today just isn’t your day”. Actually it is. I’m having a great day! Would, could. Yes there is a difference. If you think acting the big shot is a good way to run the country than you hell sure got your wish. I’ll repeat myself, ” I’m not trying to downplay the problem, but there is a good way to go about things and a bad way.” For now we are stuck with your way. Let me know how it works out for you in a year. Until then, I’ve bigger fish to fry.

          29. InternetCensorsREvil says

            There is a RIGHT way to go about things and there is a useless and ineffectual way to go about things. Trump is doing it right. We’ve already seen 8 years of weak, ineffectual government.

            It isn’t that he is ACTING like a big shot – that would be wrong. Its that he IS a big shot. He has a responsibility and he isn’t afraid to swing with big punches when he has to.

            No president in modern history has EVER come out of an election and actually started fulfilling election promises – until Trump.

          30. ABO says

            Got caught in your lies so you just change the subject and fabricate more baseless nonsense. Oh, you are just a clever one you are. At least by liberal standards.

          31. InternetCensorsREvil says

            BTW, Giuliani’s comments are hearsay and won’t be allowed as evidence in any court – except the most liberal.

            As for your ‘turd’ analogy – we’ve had a turd squatting in the offal office for 8 years – he’s gone and the new president is doing a bang up job fixing the crap he left behind.

          32. ABO says

            Oh, here it comes. “Very likely it is unconstitutional”, so you finally admit that you actually indeed not cited any violation of the Constitution as you claimed you had. You are just assuming that it must be as you say it is. Pathetic.

          33. Eric Hartman says

            Oh, so you are a Constitutional Lawyer? Perhaps you are not aware of all the lawsuits already filed against the ban on Constitutional basis’? I will still stand behind my statements which sighted why. People much smarter than me that specialize in Constitutional law say it is unconstitutional. So since you are such an ex-spurt, you tell me why it isn’t.

          34. ABO says

            I never claimed to be a Constitutional Lawyer. Unlike pretenders like you I simply research the subject before I respond, whereas you simply make up your “facts” as you go along and pretend to know all the answers until someone who has done the research shows you up for the pathetic fraud that you are and you immediately set out to change the story and spin the original narrative to fit your pathetic agenda, showing you up for the delusional clown you are.

          35. Eric Hartman says

            All that gibberish and not an answer to my question? Seems all you are capable of is slinging crap.

          36. ABO says

            Do I need to type more slowly for you to comprehend? You asked “Oh so you are a Constitutional Lawyer?” I answered, “I never claimed to be a Constitutional Lawyer.” I would suggest that you might sign up for a remedial course in reading comprehension, second grade level for you, just so you don’t get confused.

          37. Eric Hartman says

            Where do you “research”? More alternate facts sights like this one? Your whole problem is you are a political hack trying to make this a political issue when it is a legal issue. tRump was within his rights to fire her. He is a moron and political hack for doing it. Were you aware he has already changed the order to make it apear more legal because of said lawsuits? prolly not. Good bye.

          38. ABO says

            So now YOU are claiming to be a Constitutional Lawyer, claiming that my comments are political and yours are based in law. You are atypical liberal lemming. You have no idea what you are talking about. You just buy the twisted liberal rhetoric that they feed you and since you are entirely incapable of thinking for yourself you just spew said rhetoric even though it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, politically or legally. You must be so proud that you are such a pathetic, delusional moron.

          39. Eric Hartman says

            pffft

          40. ABO says

            Congratulations, Moron that’s unquestionably the brightest thing you’ve managed to come up with so far! You’re making great strides toward third grade level intellect. Keep up the good work. I’m so proud of you!

          41. Eric Hartman says

            More alternative facts? Have a lovely day. hehehe

          42. ABO says

            You are such an immature dimwit Thanks for showing everyone just what sort of brainless idiots liberals really are. We appreciate the effort on your part. hehehehe

          43. Eric Hartman says

            You should really make an attempt to not project yourself onto others, me in particular. You might find life to be more pleasant. 🙂

          44. Eric Hartman says

            instead of wasting your time online (and mine) perhaps you should read something of substance? Good bye nincompoop.

          45. ABO says

            You really are completely devoid of any intellect whatsoever aren’t you.

          46. Eric Hartman says

            Please refer to my last reply to you concerning your nasty habit of projecting.

          47. ABO says

            Typical liberal lemming. Twist and spin others words to fit your moronic agenda. You are obviously entirely incapable of presenting any legitimate point and therefore you must resort to ridiculously inept tactics. You desperately need to gain at least some basic knowledge of the U.S. Constitution before making even more a fool of yourself with your idiotic blather.

          48. Eric Hartman says

            Mwahahahahahem. You call ME the lemming?? Hehheh. Surely you jest.

          49. ABO says

            Yes indeed I called you a lemming as that is exactly what your comments have proved you be. No I do not jest. You have proved yourself to be the court jester in this arena and I would not assume to usurp your legitimate claim to it.

          50. Eric Hartman says

            Wrong. The lawsuits are filed. Too bad your alternate facts don’t keep you up to date 🙂 Let me know when you get your law degree or become a judge then we’ll chat. Until then you just continue to be a good little rat and follow your tRump Pied Piper.

          51. ABO says

            And you just continue to show everyone who read your childish gibberish just what sort of pathetic dimwit you really are. I believe if you had a brain you would take it out and play with it.

          52. Eric Hartman says

            You say so, but it seems to me you are doing a damn good job of that your own self 🙂

          53. ABO says

            Is that really all you’ve got??? Project much? Well you just proved the ‘childish’ part. You sound like a two year old on the playground answering a slight with “I know you are but what am I?” Get back to me when you grow up, dimwit.

          54. richardwfaith says

            Do I see soro$$$$$$ amidst and American flag and Christmas decorations? It’s so easy to imagine Jesus Himself looking at this and softly saying, “Christ!”

          55. irish1919 says

            She will follow through on any executive order which is legal and constitutional , her personal views or feelings be damned. She violated a direct lawful order and defied the very constitution which gave the president to executive order. She may also have jeopardized thousands of terrorists to enter our country. She is a twit. Don’t let the door hit you in the arse on your way out.

          56. Eric Hartman says

            Ahhhhh, but it is not a legal order. You know, that pesky little First Amendment you all love to preach (pun intended) until it bites you in the ass. And again to you like your cohorts on here, “violated a direct and lawful order”, are we now living in a military dick-tater-ship? Last I knew we aren’t there YET.

          57. InternetCensorsREvil says

            So what is the illegal activities? What law has been broken?

          58. Eric Hartman says

            Oh, how about that pesky little First Amendment to the Constitution? You know the one you guys love until you hate it?

          59. InternetCensorsREvil says

            What about the 1st Amendment?

            Yes, I hate that it allows liberals to say stupid shitte, but I still defend their right to be stupid and say stupid stuff.

          60. Eric Hartman says

            Ummm, if I remember correctly there is more to the First Amendment than just being able to say stupid stuff like you just did?

          61. InternetCensorsREvil says

            Quit deflecting. YOU brought up the 1st Amendment out of the blue. Explain yourself. What has it to do with this topic?

          62. ABO says

            Good luck with that, ICRE.

          63. InternetCensorsREvil says

            I don’t expect @Eric Hartman will have a response. Liberals typically do not. But, hey, I’m just enjoying the ride.

          64. ABO says

            He is sort of amusing, if only in a twisted sort of way.

          65. shref40 says

            Why don’t you test the 1st amendment? Go into your boss’ office and tell him he is a crock of sshit. See what happens to your job.

          66. Eric Hartman says

            Moron. Why don’t you actually read the 1st amendment and use your pea brain. Or should that be pee brain.

          67. ABO says

            Oh, ya. The 1st amendment. The one you liberals twist and spin to get it to fit your pathetic agenda. Oh and I’m sure everyone here was expecting the insults and baseless accusations as it is the way with you when you suddenly realize you’re making complete fools of yourselves and everyone is fully aware of it. You might try starting off right from the beginning, just for once with the truth. Then you wouldn’t find yourself in this awkward position every time you post. Go ahead, try it, it won’t hurt and you might just learn something, although in your case I tend to doubt it.

          68. Eric Hartman says

            Awkward position? you say so. More of your alternate facts?

          69. ABO says

            Oh, sorry I almost forgot. You’re not even aware of your abysmal stupidity.

          70. Progressive Republican says

            Show me where the Constitution says that challenging a law’s constitutionality is its job.

          71. InternetCensorsREvil says

            Really!!! Are you seriously asking that question? What, did you flunk out of civics in High School?

            Or perhaps you are just another foreigner liberal snowflake who has no business opining upon US politics?

            If you want to have an exchange on an adult level about US politics, you at least need to educate yourself on the very BASICS of US Politics.

          72. Progressive Republican says

            Didn’t think so.

          73. InternetCensorsREvil says

            What a troll.

          74. Progressive Republican says

            Thus proving my point.

          75. InternetCensorsREvil says

            That you are a troll, yup. Happy to help you with that one.

          76. InternetCensorsREvil says

            Are you REALLY that ignorant of the US Constitution or just being a troll – playing the part of being willfully ignorant for the purpose of yanking someone’s chain; or perhaps, as I suggested above, you aren’t even a US citizen to begin with and therefore have no business poking your nose into this discussion.

            FYI: In explaining judicial power under the Constitution, Hamilton noted that the courts would have the authority to determine whether laws passed by the legislature were consistent with the fundamental and superior law of the Constitution. If a law was contrary to the Constitution, then it was void. Not surprisingly, the Supreme Court agreed, famously announcing its authority to rule on the validity of laws—known as judicial review—in the case of Marbury v. Madison. In weighing the validity of a provision of the Judiciary Act of 1789, Chief Justice John Marshall declared that “It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is.”

          77. irish1919 says

            They can voice an opinion but do not have authority to ignore a direct lawful and constitutional order. Trump has an obligation to tell Miss twit, that frankly he doesn’t give a dam what she thinks or feels. My only question of Donald is why he ever kept an OBAMA loser in charge of AG. Really??? She was going to defy him in any order .

          78. Eric Hartman says

            No, the ban is not a lawful order! That pesky little first amendment that you all love to preach (no pun intended) until it bites you in the ass. “Direct and lawful order”..I have to ask again, are we now living in a military dick-tater ship?

          79. Progressive Republican says

            Common sense from a conservative?

            And here I thought I was an optimist!

          80. Eric Hartman says

            Me? A Conservative? Sorry to break your lil pea pickin heart but NOT! (a conservative that is. Oh, but not a Hillary lover either)

          81. Progressive Republican says

            You’re clearly not a conservative. I was poking fun at your suggestion that a conservative show common sense.

            Good luck with that one.

          82. Eric Hartman says

            Thanks. Figured it out and replied again. You are correct, there is no hope.

          83. Progressive Republican says

            *sigh*

          84. Eric Hartman says

            yup.

          85. Eric Hartman says

            UUUUUUUUU! The big bad boogeyman!

          86. GODBlessRealAmerica says

            We have a bunch of Liberal Democrackhead idiots who still support bernie the wacko & Crooked evil Hillary! Sad!

            https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/3de433b765cedb37746085a72053c871ffb645113fe9a71e35398a35f0a26099.jpg

          87. Eric Hartman says

            You really need to read all my posts to keep up. sad.

          88. richardwfaith says

            Better to EXTRADITE him to Russia, where an active arrest warrant awaits him. Better YET, include his SONS in the shipment; hopefully President Trump can persuade Putin that said sons are likely accessories to some of the old “man’s” crimes against Russia. The English and the French would also like to get their hands on him, but IMO the Russians are the LEAST LIKELY to PLAY FOOTSIE with soro$$$$$$. If President Trump gets around to COMMITTING these WISE ACTS, then WATCH the soro$$$$$$ inve$tment fund$ PLUMMET TO ZERO VALUE OVERNIGHT. Oh what a DELICIOUS event to look forward to!

          89. Eric Hartman says

            hahaha yeah asking too much aren’t I…

          90. shref40 says

            She didn’t tell the POTUS. She told all her staff across the country to disobey the POTUS. Try to keep up.

          91. Eric Hartman says

            Why don’t you actually read what her duties are?

          92. ABO says

            Our Mr. Hartman doesn’t need to keep up. He simply makes up his “facts” as he goes along and then lies about his “facts” and then when he gets caught at it he just starts name calling, like a little two year old and making utterly baseless accusations. In other words, a typical liberal lemming.

          93. Eric Hartman says

            cute. No, not going to share it. So where is this “RealAmerica” you speak of in your moniker? Just need to know so I will avoid spending my vacation dollars there. Maybe I’ll just stay home. We voted for Bernie. Home is the “realAmerica” IMHO. Perhaps you should work on succeeding?

          94. GODBlessRealAmerica says

            Truth Yes!!!! but in your liberal low energy liberal mind a truth is a lie and a lie is a truth!
            Real AMERICA spoke we elected PRESIDENT TRUMP whether you like it or not! We can care less…Home is Traditional America we don’t want your liberal racist progressive hateful America you want now sit down!!! PERHAPS YOU SHOULD RIOT LIKE THE REST OF BERNIE THUGS!!!!! https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/7cb5a7f97cea3cc19ea7db7ebfb575004086d63f5c355a4049195b2a08c8d732.jpg

          95. richardwfaith says

            It is actually soro$$$$$$’s legacy as President-in-Fact, with obamA as his TWO-TERM PUPPET. hillarY, had soro$$$$$$ had his way, would have constituted his THIRD, and possibly (God forbid) FOURTH term. For those who remember, johN kerrY was soro$$$$$$’s earlier (and thank God, FAILED) attempt. bilL klintoN was probably an earlier, and unfortunately successful, incarnation of a soro$$$$$$ Presidency; if SO, then soro$$$$$$ HAS ALREADY BEEN POTUS, for FOUR TERMS. YIKES!!!!!
            .
            But you know, that would explain a whole lot of what has gone wrong!

          96. ABO says

            Oh, like Bernie did??? In case you forgot, Bernie, after calling out HRC as having been Bought and paid for by the ultra rich, sold out and changed his tune completely, covering her with his unlimited praise. Typical liberal hypocrite. Kinda like you.

          97. Eric Hartman says

            Well that is simplifying the matter, but for a simple mind such as yours, I guess that is all you can comprehend. It is just unfortunate that the Dems and voters didn’t elect Bernie in the primaries. We wouldn’t have a moron in the White House with a bunch of idiots surrounding him.

          98. ABO says

            Bernie Sanders happens to be one of my U.S. Senators. I’ve known Bernie for nearly thirty years. Nice guy but I wouldn’t vote for him if my life depended on it. He’s well aware of that and he knows why.

          99. Eric Hartman says

            Yes he is a nice guy. And you wouldn’t vote for him prolly because you are a moron.

          100. ABO says

            I see you aren’t even capable of spelling simple words properly. Illiterate as well as abysmally stupid. I wouldn’t vote for Bernie for one very simple reason. Over all the years that I have communicated through e-mail with Bernie, since he became our U.S. Senator he has consistently lied about his position on every issue I have asked him about. You of course wouldn’t care that you’re being lied to, as all you care about is that they feed you what you want to hear. Of course you can’t be bothered doing the research in order to know when you’re being lied to. You’re too lazy and too apathetic to bother with things like truth. I guess you must ‘prolly’ be the moron here since you’ve done nothing but waste my time for two days now making utterly baseless, dimwitted statements and backing them up with nothing but childish immature blather Go back to wanking in your Mommy’s basement. You’re far better suited to that.

          101. Eric Hartman says

            Pfffft. Dolt.

        2. irish1919 says

          Amen!! The left cannot be trusted to uphold the constitution or enforce any laws for that matter.

        3. Progressive Republican says

          No. That is not SCOTUS’ job.

          Their job is to determine a law’s constitutionality, not challenge it.

          1. InternetCensorsREvil says

            So, GENIUS, who DOES challenge the constitutionality?

            It isn’t the DOJ. The principal duties of the Attorney General are to:

            Represent the United States in legal matters.

            Supervise and direct the administration and operation of the offices, boards, divisions, and bureaus that comprise the Department.

            Furnish advice and opinions, formal and informal, on legal matters to the President and the Cabinet and to the heads of the executive departments and agencies of the government, as provided by law.

            Make recommendations to the President concerning appointments to federal judicial positions and to positions within the Department, including U.S. Attorneys and U.S. Marshals.

            Represent or supervise the representation of the United States Government in the Supreme Court of the United States and all other courts, foreign and domestic, in which the United States is a party or has an interest as may be deemed appropriate.

            Perform or supervise the performance of other duties required by statute or Executive Order.

          2. richardwfaith says

            While you have correctly stated the principal duties of the Attorney General, it is informative to note that BAD Presidents (klintoN and obamA most especially come to mind) have CONSIDERED the PURPOSE of the AG to be:
            .
            To SHIELD the President from ALL ACCOUNTABILITY, RIGHT OR WRONG. While I entirely disagree with the latter notion, I acknowledge that things often and unfortunately work that way.

      2. Pam Dunn says

        BULLSHYTE you liberal moron and idiot.

        1. Eric Hartman says

          Pammy dunn be ignorant. Once again see what your boy Jefferson Beauregard Sessions has to say about it.
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3yDjylQ5Ps

      3. cutterguy says

        that is the supreme courts job

        1. Eric Hartman says

          It is, but it is NOT the AG’s job to blindly follow the POTUS into what may well be an illegal act. The AG’s advice should be taken into account and it is the AG’s duty (per the justice Dept, above) “Furnish advice and opinions, formal and informal, on legal matters to the President and the Cabinet and to the heads of the executive departments and agencies of the government, as provided by law.” It is quite obvious to me that the AG should be able to do said duty without the fear of reprisal. This is (or at least was) America. We used to be proud to be a country of laws. “I AM NOT A CROOK!!!” “It’s not illegal if the President does it!!”, R.M. Nixon. Remember him?

          1. irish1919 says

            Fine. Resign your position then. Truth is she was dead wrong in trying to politicize a lawful direct order and undermine our nations security and our constitution . YOU’RE FIRED!!!! Love it.

          2. Eric Hartman says

            No, she was trying to keep your beloved tRumps ass out of a sling but he was too stupid to realize it. Me? yeah I might have just said, “you’re on your own bub”. It’s all coming out in the wash though. Your man and his minions have no respect for the Constitution. LOVE IT!!

          3. Eric Hartman says

            No, sorry but you are dead wrong. There is nothing political about obeying laws is there? Never mind don’t answer. It is you that is the political dolt.

      4. gerald kaminski says

        You are exactly correct. She did what Senator Sessions advised in her confirmation hearing was her legal duty to do and what she advised Senator Sessions she would do.

        1. Eric Hartman says

          Thank you.

      5. WEwillsucceed says

        The story and the truth never gets told by dimms or the press except FOX NEWS. The President did get JUSTICE Dept review and agreement. So there was no justification except political nonsense for silly sally to do what she did. Remember silly sally, elections have consequences. GO PRESIDENT TRUMP. WE SUPPORT YOU!

        1. Eric Hartman says

          MWAHAhahahahahahahahahem. You’re such a hoot! umm, you are kidding right?

      6. richardwfaith says

        Get serious! The AG is APPOINTED by the President, ACCOUNTABLE to the President, and eligible to be FIRED by the President, WITH OR WITHOUT CAUSE. What part of “CABINET” do you not understand? “To the Victors belong the spoils of victory”: Governor Marcy. Andrew Jackson (a DEMOCRAT!) extended the practice of what became known as the “Spoils System”.

        1. Eric Hartman says

          What a dolt. The AG is appointed by the President and APPROVED by the Senate. Sally Yates went through the approval in 2015. Jeff Sessions questioned her grilled her as to what she would do if then President Obama ordered her to something illegal.
          http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/31/politics/sally-yates-jeff-sessions-deputy-attorney-general-hearing/
          https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/national/watch-jeff-sessions-grill-sally-yates-on-opposing-the-president/2017/01/31/c69106c2-e7af-11e6-903d-9b11ed7d8d2a_video.html
          The AG gives legal advice to the President. The AG is also subject to impeachment for treason, high crimes and misdemeanors. The AG can also challenge the constitutionality of law. AG is responsible in representing the GOVERNMENT in all legal matters. Ultimately, the AG is accountable to US as in WE THE PEOPLE. And yes, the AG can be removed by the President, if he is stupid enough to do that father than follow legal advice from the AG. tRump made such a stupid move. If I were in the AG position and deemed an order was not legal I would not obey it either. It has been determined that following orders is no excuse if you recall.
          What you political hacks and this article are doing is making this whole incident a political issue. What I contend it is a LEGAL issue. Last I heard at least 4 states have filed lawsuits. Were you aware that your hero POTUS has already rewritten parts of his lovely EO because of said lawsuits? Probably not. So you can take you little ill thought spoils issue and put it where the sun don’t shine. Yes, tRump was well within his rights to remove Ms Yates but he is a moron for doing so. If a legal question arises I would trust Sally Yates more than I would trust the nincompoop you elected to office. I say thank you Sally for doing your job. Ultimately the courts will now decide. I will be happy to supply you with a little napkin to wipe the political egg off your face. Good bye.
          Oh, if you read something other than alternate facts and had some common sense maybe you could figure things out.

    7. AKLady says

      The Courts and Congress will out this wannabe dictator in his place.

  3. GODBlessRealAmerica says

    GO TRUMP NO NONSENSE KICK ASS PRESIDENT!!!OLD SCHOOL BARE KNUCKLES CLOBBER THESE LIBERAL PIGS!!!!!!!!! https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/a61eea02d9c7ec33e65de7e9989350fe5a3130ac547067a34b4e085cdbf35855.jpg

  4. Rob D says

    That dumb Obama reject thought DT was gonna take that crap from her? Go have a drink with Loretta, Eric and the rest of you traitorous socialist pigs. Dump them all in the gutter they crawled from.

    1. Rosie says

      EXACTLY! Screw ’em! And, this is just the beginning!

      1. Lindseywchristensen says

        Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj542d:
        On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
        !mj542d:
        ➽➽
        ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash542ShopCompanyGetPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★::::::!mj542d:….,….

    2. irish1919 says

      She learned well from Loretta. How to be corrupt, lie, obstruct and otherwise disrespect the constitution . What a loser !!!! We can and will do better.

      1. Carol Smith says

        i applaud yates. she was upholding the rule of law. trump does not care about the rule of law. he just fans his ego.

        1. InternetCensorsREvil says

          She was NOT upholding the rule of law. EOs and laws carry the same force until a FEDERAL court says otherwise. Since no court has done so, she is required by her oath of office to uphold ALL laws, or resign or be fired.

          She chose to make a political statement rather than do her damned job – so she was fired. Simple.

          1. Carol Smith says

            she upheld he law. look it up.

          2. jerrycollie says

            Trump should have had her arrested and drug out of her office by her hair and down the steps, thump, thump, thump!

          3. AKLady says

            You are insane.

          4. ELBIB says

            Ah, who better than you to know the sight of insanity, as you view it daily peering into it’s depth, viewing yourself within the mirror!

          5. AKLady says

            So very childish.
            The right-wing is simply amazing.

          6. Chiefbuck says

            Yes it is, in fact it’s the only responsible political party that we currently have. Just the fact that you are a democrat is more than enough proof that my point is accurate. Take a careful look and see who some of the other democrats are and decide exactly where you fit in. Take a look at Charlie Schumer’s little head and just imagine what size brain fits into that noggin. He should get a discount when buying hats.

          7. AKLady says

            Wow, 79 words that say absolutely nothing.

          8. Chiefbuck says

            GFY

          9. Debbie Bowman says

            We know you think so lol

          10. AKLady says

            Yet, another example of your lack of language comprehension.
            Are you a Russian troll?

          11. InternetCensorsREvil says

            The law is the EO. She refused to defend it in court, violating her oath of office, and was fired and justly so. Look it up…

          12. Retired says

            Libturds will never agree to that unless it is in their favor.

          13. AKLady says

            Name calling is childish.
            Most give it up by the 2nd or 3rd grade.
            You need to practice more, you have not yet gotten the conservative part down.

          14. Retired says

            Poor baby can’t handle the truth.

          15. AKLady says

            Thank you.
            Your input is always welcome
            It says so much about you.

          16. Rosie says

            Retired,
            AK(CRAZY) Lady said the same thing about one of my comments “blah blah blah it says so much about you blah blah blah”. I already figured her out. She’s either on a different planet, completely insane or is really in the third grade. As the saying goes – “There are none so blind as those who will not see”!

          17. Retired says

            She is a lonely old lady looking for attention, that is why she has a written script . She claims to have put THREE husband in the ground.

          18. Rosie says

            They probably buried themselves alive to get away from her. I guess that “says so much about her”!

          19. Retired says

            Someone else had said the same thing .

          20. AKLady says

            Thank you.
            Your input is always welcome
            It says so much about you.

          21. Benjamin Michel says

            With what ?????

          22. AKLady says

            Two of my husbands were KIA Vietnsm, they are buried at Arlington National Cemetery. My third husband died this past year. Part of his illness was due to wounds received while on active duty.

          23. NavymanBill says

            And she says she is a retired military doctor-I haven’t been able to determine the branch-who served during the Vietnam War, though she attended the Uniformed Service School of Health Science which wasn’t created until the early 80s (VN ended in ’75) and thinks she is better educated , more experienced, and of more superior intellect than anyone posting here. She used to annoy me. now i’m just kinda sorry for her.

          24. Retired says

            Her Stories just do not add up. All that had medics in the field, but I do not believe Dr. were in the field, hospitals that were set up away from the fighting yes.

          25. AKLady says

            Your beliefs are very different from actual facts.
            Your statements regarding Vietnam clearly indicate you did not serve in that war,

          26. Retired says

            Tell us the years you was there and who was your CO. .

          27. AKLady says

            “..you was there”
            Learn English and get back to me.

            Your statements regarding Vietnam clearly indicate you did not serve in that war

          28. Retired says

            So you can not remember the years or who your Co. was .

          29. AKLady says

            I was there.
            You were not there

            When to use ‘was’ versus ‘were’ https://wordcounter.net/blog/2016/03/21/101072_when-to-use-was-versus-were.html

          30. Debbie Bowman says

            Can’t answer a question. That’s the answer!!!!

          31. AKLady says

            Again, you have proven your lack of language mastery.
            Are you a Russian troll?

          32. AKLady says

            I am a retired surgeon.
            Uncle Sam sent me to medical school
            In return, he was paid with 6 years of my life.
            I served two tours in combat hospitals in Vietnam.
            TRY GETTING FACTS CORRECT, AT ;EAST ONCE IN AWHILE.

          33. NavymanBill says

            You had TWO Combat tours in VietNam as a physician??? YOU LIAR!! You are younger than I am!! You told me so that last time we “engaged on this site. I’m 62-I went in service in 1972-at 17! You TOLD me how old you are, and about your family

          34. AKLady says

            Try reading.
            Also, stop lying.
            I did two tours at combat hospitals in Vietnam, as a surgeon.
            I was in Vietnam in 1970 and 1971.
            I have two children on active duty in Afghanistan.

          35. NavymanBill says

            You keep telling everyone they are LIARS-YOU ARE THE BIGGEST LIAR ON HERE!!! You are YOUNGER than I AM-You ADMITTED it to me last year in another exchange, when you were on your “get yourself an education” rant. You told me about your father and growing up in a military family. You were not in Vietnam-at least not as a doctor or surgeon. You TOLD me that you graduated from Medical School at USUHS-which wasn’t established until the early 80s. Maybe you were a 12-14 y/o combat medic!!! (lol) . AKLady-I’ve had enough of you-you are a very sad and troubled person. I realize that these exchanges give an otherwise empty life some meaning. but you really do need some counseling. Seek some help. And if you can’t/won’t do that, at least try to remember who you told what story to. Pathetic.

          36. AKLady says

            The Uniform Services University of Health Sciences opened its doors in 1972.

          37. NavymanBill says

            And YOU said in this thread that you were an Army Surgeon in Vietnam in 1970-71!! . The ARMY left VietNam in ’73! (Except for a few guys at MACV) All the field hospitals, etc, returned to America in’73. That is when I GOT OUT of the Army. I went in USAF in ’74.(Served in USAF and later transferred to USN) There were only some Embassy types there, until the fall of VN in the spring of ’75. Most of what responded then were Navy and AF and some embarked Marines to assist in the evacuation. AKLady., you are in over your head now. Stop embarrassing yourself. You know and I know that you weren’t there.

          38. AKLady says

            Your post makes no sense, whatsoever.
            The troops left in 1973. I was in Vietnam in 1970 and 1971.

            1970 is THREE YEARS BEFORE 1973
            1971 is TWO YEARS BEFORE 1973.

            Please read the facts and do the counting.
            Stop embarrassing yourself.

          39. NavymanBill says

            AKLady-STOP LYING!! YOU are YOUNGER than I am!! . You told me that earlier in 2016. Where did you get your medical training-and when? You said you graduated from USUHS-Even by YOUR date of 9/1972-it wasn’t open in 1970-1971.!! Were you an EM? A Field Medic? Where did you get your surgical training? Med School? Who were you with? What units? Until you start being forthcoming, you are just peddling LIES. YOU ADMITTED TO ME LAST YEAR THAT YOU DID NOT SERVE IN VIETNAM!
            You are a troubled person. You can’t even remember your lies, or who you told them to.. I have had enough of your nonsense. I am going to ask your name and rank. and I will go to the National Personnel Records Bureau. I am also going to go to Stolen Valor-the website and report you. There are a lot of guys there who have a lot more time than I do, and will verify your service record, or not It is time to ‘fess up. Maybe you’re telling the truth. But I don’t think so.

          40. AKLady says

            Blah, blah, blah, lie, insult …repeat ad nauseam.
            Tedious, boring, repetitive …

          41. NavymanBill says

            Your usual responses aren’t working AKLady. I don’t have to insult you. You are more than capable of making a fool of yourself without any help. I have done some research, and am doing more. There were NO female Army surgeons/physicians in VietNam-ever! There were plenty of nurses, but that is not what you said you were! I have asked a good friend -Army nurse in “:Nam/later-now in State dept-and she has verified the same. I am also trying to verify the first graduation date at USUHS-it was well after Viet Nam ended-I’ll get back to you on it. And you said you were in Nam in ’70 and’71 as a Medical officer in a field hospital. (You admitted to me you weren’t in “Nam last year, BTW. ) And IF you were a commissioned officer/medical officer in Nam in 70 /71-that means that you would have HAD to be commissioned in at latest 1969. And you were in the Army for six years-as stated above.You would have been out of the Army before anyone graduated from USUHS. I’ll get back to you on the USUHS dates.

          42. AKLady says

            There were 11,000 military women were stationed in Vietnam during the conflict, all of them were volunteers.

            Maybe you should look into The Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service. They serve in over 20 government departments and agencies, including the Department of Defense.

            Maybe you should stop putting your foot in your mouth.

          43. NavymanBill says

            AKLady, sorry to say this but your numbers just don’t work. You said above that you did TWO tours in VietNam as an Army Medical Officer, 1970 and 71.(Back to back-hmm) And that you served in the Army for six years. THE USUHS website states that the first Pres of USUHS Dr Anthony Curreri, was appointed Jan 7. 1974. Their website considers their founding date in 1975 with Jay P. Sanford the Founding Dean. The EARLIEST possible class to graduate would have been at the end of 1976-early 77. And per your claim of six years of service with a Nam Tour in 1970, you would have already been out of the Army by then.
            No insults. Just the numbers. Yours don’t work. Q. E. D.

          44. AKLady says

            Again, you assume I did my entire training at the F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine. I’ve never claimed that to be the case. The first class graduated in 1980.

            The Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences was established in 1972.

            F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine is located in Bethesda, Maryland on the campus of the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center.

            I also state that my undergraduate degree is from Charter Oak State College. That college did not exist when I graduated, nor is it the name on my diploma. When my diploma was issued, the institution was officially known as the Connecticut Board for State Academic Awards.

          45. NavymanBill says

            You don’t have to lecture me about USUHS, I got one of my Medical Explorers into. It. I used to know the Admissions Director (circa 2002). I have been there several times. USUHS did NOT start admitting students until 1975-76. Go to their website. They didn’t even have a President until 1974, not a Dean until 1975, as I have mentioned. So If you were going there in 1972, it must have been pretty lonely.!!

            You said last year that you attended USUHS. Before you started saying that you served two tours in Viet Nam as an Army Medical Officer in 1970 and 1971. I almost believe you about that, But you didn’t do two tours in VietNam. There were NO female doctors or surgeons in VietNam. Only Nurses and some administrative types.

            Your story doesn’t hold up.

          46. NavymanBill says

            PS By your own admission ABOVE, the first class graduated in 1980. You said you served in the Army for six years. Even if you got a direct commission into the Army in 1970, and went to VietNam right away(not likely-All Drs spent a FEW months in an Army Hospital before going overseas, and miscellaneous training) , you STILL would have been out of the Army in 1975-76, per your six years of service admission in this thread. Your story doesn’t work.

          47. AKLady says

            You can insult all you want.
            You also seem to think that a name change equals a facility change.

            Your expectation of machismo leaves a very bad taste in the mouths of women who served In that war. Uncle Sam was happy to get every doctor it could. He did not care what gender, race or religion they were.

          48. NavymanBill says

            AKLady, I reached out to a good friend who was an Army Nurse at Long Binh 1968-69, and is now a big player at State Dept. (I’m not going to give you her name, -you have given us NOTHING about you but a half-baked story, but she is the genuine article.)
            Her message to me for you:
            “There were three kinds of women in country-nurses, more or less clerks/secretaries/administrative assistants (pretty much all assigned to Long Binh HQ) and a few enlisted maintenance types (motor pool and such) I never met a American female doc-not even one on familiarization tour(OK there were Red Cross girls and USO entertainers,too)_-NEVER HEARD OF ONE-AND WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY SURPRISED TO LEARN THAT ONE ACTUALLY EXISTED. (my caps). As a matter of personal safety (female nurses were outnumbered by men 500:1) she would have to be housed with the nurses-and we would have heard about, met, and/or at least heard rumors of one-if she actually existed. You can’t rely too much on central military records-they classified many women as men-trying to keep head count of women down in the official records. But the claim to have graduated the USUHS before it existed is way off. My opinion is that she is a fraud and will need serious mental help.”
            No insults from me. That is from someone who was there. AND YOU WEREN’T.

          49. AKLady says

            Names of female POWs, Vietnam War, per your demand:

            Evelyn Anderson, captured and later burned to death in Kengkok, Laos, 1972. Remains recovered and returned to U.S.

            Beatrice Kosin was captured and burned to death in Kengkok, Laos, 1972. Remains recovered and returned to U.S.

            Betty Ann Olsen was captured during a raid on the leprosarium in Ban Me Thuot during Tet 1968. She died in 1968 and was buried somewhere along Ho Chi Minh Trail by fellow POW, Michael Benge.

            Eleanor Ardel Vietti was captured at the leprosarium in Ban Me Thuot, May 30, 1962. She is still listed as POW.

          50. NavymanBill says

            Okay, Fair enough. You pulled them off of Google All USAID people. NOT MILITARY-which made their situation much more precarious.
            BUT that doesn’t change YOUR statements about YOUR TWO TOURS as an Army NEDICAL Officer. Still sticking with that?

          51. AKLady says

            Fact is fact.
            POW is POW.
            Give it up, you were proven wrong.
            Save the insults for someone you can impress.

          52. NavymanBill says

            Back On TOPIC, Please. We were talking about your TWO TOURS as an Army Medical Officer in VietNam 1970, 1971, as above. and SIX years in the Army but graduated from USUHS which didn’t graduate its first class in til 1980. YOU WERE PROVEN WRONG- There WERE NO female Army Medical Officers in VietNam!. EVER! You can’t/ won’t address your false statement!! You have been caught in a lie and are throwing out distractors and don’t have the backbone or the sense to accept that your lies have been disproven. As my REAL Army Nurse from VietNam said “You need serious mental help.” As for the POW women. fair enough. Four of them from USAID. But what does that have to do with YOU LYING about two tours in Vietnam 1970/1971 as an Army Medical Officer.? Please answer that or just go away.

          53. AKLady says

            YOU WHERE CAUGHT IN A LIE.

            YOU WERE CAUGHT CLAIMING

            THERE WERE NO FEMALE POWS DURING THE VIETNAM WAR.

            SAVE YOUR INSULTS’ FOR SOMEONE YOU CAN IMPRESS.

            STOP LYING

          54. NavymanBill says

            I didn’t KNOW about Female POWS, . That means you corrected me. There is a difference between NOT KNOWING, AND LYING! For someone who is supposedly so much smarter than all the rest of us, your faulty logic is rather sad. NOW, BACK TO THE TOPIC, PLEASE?

            WHAT UNIT WERE YOU IN IN VIETNAM?

            WHERE WERE YOU STATIONED?

            WHO WAS YOUR CO?

            WHEN DID YOU GRADUATE FROM USUHS? And STOP TELLING ME IT WAS ESTABLISHED IN ”72. IT DIDN”T GRADUATE THE FIRST CLASS UNTIL 1980. YOU SAID YOU WERE IN THE ARMY FOR SIX YEARS. 1970-1980 IS A TEN YEAR SPAN. (YOU TOLD ME LAST YEAR YOU DID NOT SERVE IN VIET NAM. Remember?)

            THERE WERE NO FEMALE US ARMY DOCTORS IN THE VIETNAM WAR, AKLADY. GIVE IT UP. You weren’t there as a Doctor, if you were there at all-which you weren’t

            YOU ARE A PHONY, OR A LIAR. And you need serious mental help.

            BTW I am not trying to impress YOU or anyone else. Eventually, I will find out who you are-I am already in contact with USUHS to try to determine who you are- I have a FOIA request into them-.and then I am going to out you on “Stolen Valor”. YOU are the one who tried to impress ALL OF US here with your fake persona and service record. The LIES here aren’t from ME! YOU are the one who lied about herself! And you will be exposed; A TWO TOUR FEMALE ARMY MEDICAL OFFICER IN VIETNAM-WHEN THERE WEREN’T ANY!!!

          55. AKLady says

            Please obtain psychiatric help before you harm yourself or others.

          56. NavymanBill says

            AKlady, I am not the one sitting alone in Alaska dreaming about my alternate life. “Blah, blah, blah, Repeat ad nauseum!” (roflmao) You would do well to follow your own advice, three husbands later!!

          57. NavymanBill says

            BTW, I have No intention of hurting UOU or anyone else. I just enjoy “outing” a fake.”Blah, Blah, Blah” “Repeat Ad nauseum’!!

          58. AKLady says

            “BTW, I have No intention of hurting UOU or anyone else. I just enjoy “outing” a fake.”Blah, Blah, Blah” “Repeat Ad nauseum’!!.”

            Do you even read what you type?

          59. AKLady says

            No, we are talking about your lies that I proved.
            There were women POWs during the Vietnam War.

          60. NavymanBill says

            No, you sad woman. Back on topic, please. We were TALKING ABOUT YOU! And YOUR make-believe service in VietNam as a US Army Doctor in 1970-71. Remember? I want THOSE QUESTIONS ANSWERED!!! That is how this discussion started, or is your damaged mind unable to process that? The femle POW is just a distractor. So what? What does that have to do with YOU and your SPURIOUS claim (lie) to have served in VietNam as a US Army Medical Officer? In a field hospital? Start answering those questions, or shut up and go away.

            BTW, I am investigating who you are at USUHS, thru FOIA. I should have some idea of who you really are fairly soon. We’ll see who the LIAR REALLY IS! (Hint-it isn’t me.)

          61. AKLady says

            You were proven wrong.
            Man up, behave like an adult.

          62. NavymanBill says

            Charter Oak State College-founded in 1973(!!) Even if you GRAUATED in 1973, the US Combat role ENDED with the Treaty of Paris on Jan 29. 1973. That college “did not exist when you graduated”? Then what was it known as? The Connecticut Board for State Academic Awards is NOT a college or institution! It is a governing body! It isn’t a schoolhouse, or a building. It is the GOVERNING body for Charter Oak State Colllege, like the NY or CALIF Board of Regents.You can’t graduate FROM IT! They CERTIFY the standards by which your institution/college/university convers your degree. And it was established in 1973. But you were in the US Army in VietNam as an Army Medical Officer in a Field Hospital in 1970, and again in 1971! Why would you go for an undergraduate degree after you were an Army Medical Doctor in VietNam two years earlier?? Just answer that and I will be satisfied. BTW-you also admitted last year that you are YOUNGER than I am. So you would have been a female Army Medical officer in VietNam in 1970 at about 14-15 years of age?? A female “Doogie Howser”!!! (roflmao) Stop the lies AKLADY. And stop with the POW stuff. It is a red herring -it has nothing to do with you saying that you served two tours in VietNam as an Army Medical Officer in 1970-71. You are a sad person. You have been caught out. I am investigating you as we speak. When I find out the truth about you, I am going to email everyone on this thread, and everyone you contact that you are a fraud and a liar, and in need of psychological care. Sick and sad.

          63. AKLady says

            You are an idiot.
            I have two diplomas on my wall that confirm you are an idiot.

            Charter Oak State College is governed by the Connecticut Board of Regents for Higher Education. The Board for State Academic Awards became Charter Oak College in 1973.

            There is also an institution known as Excelsior College.
            It was formally known as the Regents External Degree Program (REX).
            It is a program offered by New York State which is basically the same as the Connecticut program.

            You are a very sad person.
            Please obtain psychiatric care before you harm yourself or othes.

          64. NavymanBill says

            And you are the BIGGEST LIAR on here! Charter Oaks College was Established (FOUNDED) IN 1973,) My sailors used it to complete their degrees. (Anyone could do it./)

            You STILL haven’t answered about your fraudulent VietNam War claims:

            Where were you Stationed?

            What unit were you with?

            Who was your CO/ CO.’s?

            Until you tell me that, we can continue this as long as you like. I have a call into USUHS. I can determine enough about your profile from what I already know-where you were raised, where you went to college, the fact that you actually did go to Useless, and were commissioned in the Army (well after the Viet Nam War was over.)

            Nothing I like better than exposing Stolen Valor, and a fraud and a phony!

            By the way, “blah, blah, blah, insults insults insults, Repeat ad nauseum” )Where have I heard that before.? (lol)

          65. NavymanBill says

            AKLady, I sent earlier, but it didn’t post. Sending again:
            A friend of mine was an Army Nurse at Long Binh, RVN in 68-69. She now works for the State Department-Ph D. type. . I will not give you her name until you give me yours, but she is the genuine article.
            Her response to you:
            “There were three kinds of women in country-nurses, more or less clerks/secretaries/administrative assistants (pretty much all assigned to Long Binh HQ) and a few enlisted maintenance types (motor pool and such) . I NEVER MET A AMERICAN FEMALE DOC-NOT EVEN ONE ON FAMILIARIZATION TOUR (OK there were red cross girls and USO entertainers too)-NEVER HEARD OF ONE–AND WOULD HAVE BEEN VERY VERY SURPRISED TO LEARN THAT ONE ACTUALL EXISTED. (My caps) As a matter of personal safety (female nurses were outnumbered by men 500:1) she would have to housed with the nurses-and we would have heard about, met and/or at least heard rumors of one-IF SHE ACTUALLY EXISTED. You can’t rely too much on central military records-they classified many women as men-trying to keep head count of women down in the official records. But the claim to have graduated the USUHS before it existed is way off. My opinion is she is a fraud and will need serious mental help.”
            That from a REAL Army nurse 1LT from VN. I don’t need to add anything-wait. “No Women POWs no MIAS? Unbelievable. You don’t think that if ANY women were POWs/MIAs, there wouldn’t have been a HUGE public outcry? NAME ONE! And don’t tell me they kept them. I know all about Maj (now Gen) Rhonda Cornum, MC from Desert Storm, but the military was far different by then. You really need to get some professional help.

          66. AKLady says

            Evelyn Anderson, captured and later burned to death in Kengkok, Laos, 1972. Remains recovered and returned to U.S.

            Beatrice Kosin was captured and burned to death in Kengkok, Laos, 1972. Remains recovered and returned to U.S.

            Betty Ann Olsen was captured during a raid on the leprosarium in Ban Me Thuot during Tet 1968. She died in 1968 and was buried somewhere along Ho Chi Minh Trail by fellow POW, Michael Benge.

            Eleanor Ardel Vietti was captured at the leprosarium in Ban Me Thuot, May 30, 1962. She is still listed as POW.

          67. NavymanBill says

            Fair enough, but they weren’t military. CIA? Red Cross? Relief agencies? And Laos- US Govt never admitted to being there. Why those women’s deaths or POW status was never publicized.
            And that still doesn’t change YOUR claims to being a US Army MD in Viet Nam-two tours-1970-71. Not working.

          68. AKLady says

            You were proven wrong.
            Skip the excuses.

          69. Debbie Bowman says

            Alzheimer’s

          70. NavymanBill says

            Debbie, I just ignore her at this point.This blog gives her life some meaning.

          71. Retired Marine says

            Your research is to be applauded, and factual.
            Semper Fi

          72. NavymanBill says

            Semper Fi back at ya from “Righteous Navy”. (smile). Yeah, I actually made a nice friend thru RallyPoint who was a REAL 1LT Army Nurse at Long Binh-3rd Field Hospital-68-69, and she told me she never SAW nor heard of a female Army Doctor in those days-in country, or even back in the World (And ALL females were billeted together and were closely protected.) I contacted the US Army Women’s Museum at FT Lee, VA and spoke to the Director and the Curator on conf. call, and there were FIVE female Army Medical Officer types in Vietnam from beginning to end, and AKLady didn’t match any of their descriptions-in addition to which she admitted in an earlier thread that she is YOUNGER THAN I AM-and I first went in service in 1972 at 17 1/2. And she had TWO TOURS as a female Army MD(?) at age 15 or so? The female Doogie Howser!!! (lol, lol) (The Paris Peace accord went down on Jan 29, 1973.) A very deluded person. Not worth the effort.

          73. Retired Marine says

            LOL, I did love the “boat rides”. Thanks for your service Brother.

          74. Retired Marine says

            No doubt they all welcomed the ground, any escape, anything to avoid this Tolkien troll.
            Death would no doubt be a great escape and welcome release..

          75. AKLady says

            Yes, Rosie, the quote fits you very well “There are none so blind as those who will not see” The speaker was Jonathan Swift (1667-1745)

          76. grafra102 says

            Rosie: DID YOU JUST FIND THIS OUT??? YOU HAVEN’T BEEN ON ALL POST THAT THIS NIT WIT DOES, JUST “BEWARE”, NOW YOU CAN TAKE IT FOR WHAT IT IS WORTH, AND i AM NOT LYING!!!!

          77. Retired Marine says

            A typical dem, one poorly overloaded single brain cell which must keep it alive and somehow able to communicate mythical thoughts and ideas. They are so alike in the demoncratic party.

          78. Greg Hernandez says

            Then why don’t you practice what you preach and learn to respect President Donald J. Trump. and also learn that quoting left wing media will only get you corrections from the real world who do not live in the fools paradise that the so-called liberals live in.

          79. AKLady says

            Why do you lie?

          80. Debbie Bowman says

            Go cry a river. Your feelings hurt

          81. AKLady says

            You are ether a foreigner or illiterate.
            Which is it?

          82. Debbie Bowman says

            Your right!!!!

          83. AKLady says

            No, the EO is not law.
            Compliance with an EO is not mandated by her Oath of Office.
            He first duty is to the Constitution.

          84. Gray_Doug says

            True to a point; however, an executive order is a presidential order to be complied with by federal agencies. Federal agency compliance gives it the color of law.

          85. AKLady says

            Please note the federal employee’s Oath of Office says nothing about obeying executive orders, however, duty to the Constitution is foremost.

            “I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.” 5 U.S.C. §3331
            https://archive.opm.gov/constitution_initiative/oath.asp

          86. Greg Hernandez says

            Which gives the PRESIDENT the latitude to write that order and she was out of line. Again , READ the darned article, it explains it in the simple terms your simple mind requires

          87. AKLady says

            Do you believe everything printed in this rag?
            Maybe, you should try looking up facts for yourself,

          88. Greg Hernandez says

            If you believe this is a rag then what in hell are you doing here ? I always look up facts and not always on line as I have an extensive library and unlike you can read and do my own research.

          89. AKLady says

            Ha, ha, ha, ha , ha …

          90. Greg Hernandez says

            Ah the lovely sound of insane laughter coming from the halls of Bedlam.

          91. Rosie says

            Lmfao!

          92. Rosie says

            Greg Hernandez, Exactly correct! WTF is she doing on this site??? Ohh no, I said “WTF”!. Guess I’m getting another “it’s says so much about you” reply from AK (Crazy) Lady.

          93. NavymanBill says

            Rosie, as I said, it gives her otherwise empty life some meaning. She used to annoy me. Now I’m just kinda sorry for her. A sad person.

          94. grafra102 says

            NavymanBill: Just have fun with the miserable (it)!!!!

          95. grafra102 says

            Rosie: exactly!!! SHE IS A NUT CASE!!! BELONGS IN A WHITE JACKET!!!

          96. AKLady says

            You are mistaken. Nothing in her oath if office requires her to obey an unlawful order. The EO was unlawful. It violated The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 and the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

          97. InternetCensorsREvil says

            And yet, the EO was not an unlawful order. How many times did Obama do the same w/o you bleeding heart snowflakes raising hell over it? 19 times?

            Get over yourselves.

          98. AKLady says

            Neither President Obama nor the State Department banned or stopped applications entirely; the slowdown affected a single type of visa from a single country (and not all entry from several countries); the slowdown occurred in order to implement enhanced screening procedures, which remained in place in January 2017.

            Obama’s order slowed, not stopped, visas for Iraqis for a very specific six months., At that time, there was an ongoing court case involving two Iraqi immigrants were arrested on suspicion of ties to an insurgent group, according to American officials in Baghdad.

            Facts make a huge difference. Maybe you should try some, once in awhile?

          99. InternetCensorsREvil says

            You, like all liberal, butthurt snowflakes, haven’t a clue what facts are.

            You manufacture facts, get the tabloids like CNN to carry your putrid and fetid flag for you.

            Well, America isn’t buying your turds dresses up like tootsie rolls any longer.

          100. AKLady says

            Your claims are false.
            Your insults are Immature and foolish.

          101. InternetCensorsREvil says

            It was not unlawful and violates nothing. Once we get a conservative court who are ‘textualists’ and not liberal ‘activists’, who make judgements based upon what they think it should, or should have said, the EC will be fully enforce.

            Regardless, until a judge declares it unconstitutional, she had no standing to make that decision on her own. She served at the will of the president. End of Story.

          102. AKLady says

            Go over to the nearest junior college, register for an American Government Class.

            Our Founders established three branches of government for a reason — what you are witnessing is one of those reasons.

            The Judical Brank is not subject to the demands of the Executive or Legislative Branches. The Supreme Court is the head of the judicial branch. Unlike a criminal court, the Supreme Court rules whether something is constitutional or unconstitutional—whether or not it is permitted under the Constitution.

          103. InternetCensorsREvil says

            Go over to the nearest dumpster and toss your worthless opinions in it.

            You are a clueless snowflake.

          104. Retired says

            The only laws she supported was Obamas ,until you prove different.

          105. AKLady says

            If you are going to criticize our government, maybe you should learn how to write English.

          106. Retired says

            Yee who is lost in this world has the guts to criticize ?? Time for you to return to your cave and take the needed meds.

          107. AKLady says

            So childish. Senility has unquestionably taken root in your brain.

          108. Retired says

            Thank you for recognizing I have a Brain, senility is not there just passed my annual physical . Not as old as you are .

          109. grafra102 says

            Retired: OH YEAH AND SUCKED “ODUMBOS DICK”!!!

          110. Mr Rollo says

            You are insane.

          111. Greg Hernandez says

            READ the article. She blew it as all idiot liberals do.She went with her political beliefs and not what she was supposed to do.

          112. Chiefbuck says

            Greg, Don’t waste any valuable time trying to reason with the poor soul, take pity on her and limit your posts to her to only provide accurate insults.

          113. Mathew Molk says

            I did,,,,You obviously did not.

          114. Greg Hernandez says

            We did you didn’t.

          115. AKLady says

            Exactly. That was what her oath of office required.

          116. Gray_Doug says

            The issue is insubordination. She crossed the line in a public way and didn’t follow the process of advising the boss of her concerns before going public. She’s not only fired; SHE’S FIRED!

          117. AKLady says

            Wrong. She is sworn to uphold the law. Her first duty is to the law, not Trump.

          118. Greg Hernandez says

            You are ( Again ) the one who is wrong. ” The law ” gives the president the right to his executive order which BTW was vetted by the DOJ legal council. Didn’t you even read the article before making another inaccurate statement ?

          119. AKLady says

            Vetted by the DOJ???
            Exceot it was blocked by five (5) federal judges.
            It also has put the U.S. in a very difficult position.
            People died as a result of Trump’s ego and ignorance.
            They were in traveling to obtain health care.

          120. Greg Hernandez says

            BS. Now blocked by one judge in Seattle of all libtard places. No one died except you when your brain fried on election day.

          121. AKLady says

            Your data is out of date.
            Please expand your knowledge base.

          122. Abby701 says

            That is BS; the lady dying died 5 days before the ban. What if terrorist now enter the country on a visa and another 9/11 occurs? 5 versus 2,000???? There are always casualties in war. Use facts not inneundos.

          123. AKLady says

            Why do you lie?
            What do you gain by lying?

          124. AKLady says

            There had not been a single terror attack on American soil
            by a foreigner since 9/11.

          125. grafra102 says

            Abby701: DO NOT REPLY TO THIS DUMB ASS, SHE HAS NOTHING TO SAY!!!!

          126. Benjamin Michel says

            WHO was the five names please

          127. Debbie Bowman says

            Lol what pigs you are

          128. AKLady says

            Give me your wealthy, your rich, your huddled MBAs yearning to be tax-free.
            Send these, the English-speaking, fully insured to me.
            I lift my lamp beside the golden door and lift my leg upon your filthy poor.
            Colbert, August 3, 2017.

          129. big KAhuna says

            Never respond to AK Lady she is a Liberal plant to disrupt intelligent conversation
            Block that Bitch!

          130. grafra102 says

            bigKAhuna: Yes please do block the (it) she is known way back with this fucking comments!!!

          131. AKLady says

            Cite the law, paragraph and chapter.

          132. Greg Hernandez says

            Cite your rear end. Don’t need to waste effort on you as you are waaaay too ignorant to understand easy facts. Liberals always want to dot the i’s except when it comes to the stupidity y’all spout. Sorry but your education isn’t worth the effort.

          133. Debbie Bowman says

            Cite your one crap big mouth

          134. AKLady says

            Your language says you are either not American or you are a school dropout.
            Which is it?

          135. grafra102 says

            GREG: SHE IT IS A FUCKING DUMB ASS!!!

          136. Greg Hernandez says

            Yes she is. I have seen her tag all over conservative conversations and IT or as I call her AK Zygote , spouts the same manure day after day.

          137. NavymanBill says

            Another idiotic comment from the mentally deficient AKLADYwho BRAGS that she was a MILITARY DOCTOR?but doesn’t KNOW F##k ALL about chain of command. If Yates had half a brain, she’d have known that, if she couldn’t follow an order from the President(ANY President), she should have RESIGNED. The proper way to indicate disagreement. Instead she disobeyed-and was CORRECTLY FIRED!!!

          138. AKLady says

            Military command?? Which branch of the service — there are differences.

            There are no Warrant Officers, whatsoever, in the Air Force. An O1 is a Second Lieutenant the Army, Marines and Air Force, but an Ensign un the Coast Guard.

            An 03 is a Lieutenant JG in the Coast Guard, and a Captain in the Army. Marine and Air Force. …. and on and on and on. https://www.defense.gov/About/Insignias/Officers

            Educate yourself foolish NavymanBill.

          139. NavymanBill says

            Another idiotic response from a pathetic case. nobody said ANYTHING about different BRANCHES. IT DOESN”T MATTER! (I was in TWO, BTW). YOU TAKE THE ORDERS FROM the Commander-in-Chief. And that includes the DOJ. Please take your meds, you pathetic soul

          140. AKLady says

            I, [NAME], DO SOLEMNLY SWEAR (OR AFFIRM)

            THAT I WILL SUPPORT AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AGAINST ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC;

            that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same;

            that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and

            that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter. So help me God.

          141. NavymanBill says

            It depends on the version (date) that you are quoting, CrazyLady. I just gave an oath of enlistment LAST week to a USNR sailor(have YOU ever enlisted/ re-enlisted one of YOUR people? Somehow I doubt it.) I know MY FIRST ONE states “the President, and the officers legally appointed over me.” (1976) The one I did last week , states “the President, The Governor of the State of NY and the Officers appointed over me.(This for NYNM) Don’t lecture ME about the US Military, sweetie. You and I have gone this way before. I have been doing this since the time you started puberty.YOU HAVE NOTHING on me. And as a MEDICAL CORPS type, many of you showed an incomplete understanding of the chain of command-the point I was making initially before you started with your “out of left field ” lecture on warrant officers, etc. I FORGOT more about working with warrant officers than you will ever know, (especially since you’ve been up in the snow cave) I was talking about the Acting AG-and the fact that if she had decided that she wasn’t going to follow the President’s orders. She WAS INSUBORDINATE!! If she intended not to follow them, she should have voted with her feet -as I did from USAF in 1981. Instead, she disobeyed, and got FIRED! Correctly so. If you had ANY real work experience in the civilian sector,( I know you have little/none) you would know that a sharp disagreement with the Boss/CEO will likely get you canned!!! Most normal people understand this. You are a very troubled woman. I will pray for you.

          142. AKLady says

            Dear Bill, the oaths for officers and enlisted are different,
            Dear Bill, the oath for civilians and military are different.
            .
            There are Warrant Officers in the Army and the Coast Guard, as well as the Navy.
            United States Naval Forces, Alaska, are headquartered in Juneau
            No, darling, the judge is not/was not subordinate. She upheld her oath
            The President cannot order a judge on how to rule.

          143. grafra102 says

            NavymanBill: YOU WERE SO RESPECTFUL BY CALLING HER WOMAN, HOLY SHIT SHE MAY BE AN IT!!!

          144. franco leon says

            go tell that to all the mayors of the sanctuary cities; they haven’t read that part or are in violation.

          145. AKLady says

            Mayors work for cities, they are not federal employees.
            Their oaths are much different.

          146. Debbie Bowman says

            Got it off internet huh

          147. AKLady says

            Targeted harassment — posted or encouraged others to post harassing comments or hate speech targeting me, other individuals, or groups

          148. franco leon says

            She didn’t follow the law.

          149. AKLady says

            Trump did not follow the law.
            The Judge followed both the law, and her oath of office.

            The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965
            First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

          150. Debbie Bowman says

            Demi’s don’t think they need to follow law either huh

          151. AKLady says

            Are you an illegal?
            Your language usage says you are not American.

          152. Dawn Doran says

            You are the one that is wrong…

          153. astrc says

            Then why didn’t she “Uphold the Law”, as she “sworn to do”?

          154. Debbie Bowman says

            Oh shut up stupid

          155. AKLady says

            Are you a Russian troll?
            Your grammar is very faulty.

          156. AKLady says

            She di what her oath of office required her to do,
            She upheld the Constitution.
            She upheld the law.

          157. NavymanBill says

            Bullshit, CrazyLady.

          158. AKLady says

            Foul language, how impressive.
            Come talk tome when you develop some maturity.

          159. Debbie Bowman says

            Exactly!!!!!!!

          160. AKLady says

            Wrong. More than five federal judges have said the EU was unlawful,

          161. Greg Hernandez says

            READ the article while shutting mouth . You might just learn something , though I have my doubts. Please stop infecting intelligent conversations with you utter contempt for facts.

          162. AKLady says

            Your utter contempt for facts is the problem.

          163. concern4us says

            AK, did you not read the summary above ” The truth is that the DOJ’s Office of Legal Counsel had already approved the executive order with respect to its legality!”
            You don’t know what your stating, who are the five Federal Judges, Obama’s appointed, who doesn’t believe in the Constitution anyway!!!!!

          164. AKLady says

            Really? The ban is valid through 02/05/2017.

            Trump was forced to modify his ban to allow citizens and resident aliens to enter the country. Trump’s order is illegal, and extremely dangerous for the American People.

            The federal judges’ orders protects travelers from being removed from the country on a nationwide basis until at least February 21.
            The ignorant fool in the White House is tweeting. Lord knows, he can’t be impeached soon enough. He has placed America in immense danger, not to mention the many allies he has already insulted.

          165. Chiefbuck says

            The United States already is in serious danger due primarily the eight years when Obama was acting as president. Our reductions in military strength and intelligence abilities placed our country in serious risk. The “deals” that he made with Iran and other Islamic nations were bizarre. Obama set this country back at least ten years, it will require years to restore our nation to prosperity and to become secure again. Take a good look at our national debt and unsecured liabilities. His failure to assure the necessary fuel will make our energy costs escalate. Now that our President has restored the pipeline policies and other energy solutions we now will be assured that the necessary energy is available at reduced cost. The oath of Office states that a president must strive to protect our nation from harm. Clearly Obama failed to do that and during his time in office we were at serious risk. We will still be at risk until President Trump is able to restore our national defense to sufficient levels.

          166. AKLady says

            Are you willing to pay for what you demand?
            Of course not,
            You blame Obama, but the responsibility is yours,
            and that of people exactly like you,
            Bush gave us two wars paid for by money barrows from China.
            How much more debt do you want to add?

          167. Debbie Bowman says

            Liberals are the demanding one you stupid pig

          168. AKLady says

            Are you a Russian troll or are you a school dropout?
            Your language useage says you must be one or the other.

          169. ABO says

            Name them.

          170. AKLady says

            EOs are not laws. They do not carry the same force as laws.
            There is no requirement for any judge to enforce an unconstitutional EO.
            The federal oath requires that she uphold the Constitution.

          171. InternetCensorsREvil says

            If the EO is not declared unconstitutional, which this EO has not been, then it carries the force of law. Period and Full Stop.

          172. AKLady says

            Read The Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 and The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Then go look at what the judges actually had to say.

          173. YC says

            That Trump, I mean President Trump, is no joke! He is cleaning house like a fire sale. I have nothing but the utmost respect this POTUS. He is listening to the voice people and not the media. We finally have a President that is standing up for the silenced majority.

          174. dinkerduo says

            Right on—since when does a employee get to overturn a lawful order?!?
            I hope if one terrorists did/does get in the U.S. that this lady’s family is the one to suffer–and the people in WA State and the 9th Circuit so they can get a first hand look at what their stupid actions caused! Otherwise they just go on thinking they’re right!

        2. raledbetter says

          Honey take a valium and go to sleep for the next four years-you don’t understand the questions so how can you take part in discussions like this

        3. glorybe2 says

          More frightening yet is that CHUMP thinks he is the law. He has already proven to be totally incompetent as a leader. We have mobs in the streets and other nations are complaining and also have crowds in the streets protesting our idiotic president.

          1. Carol Smith says

            amen. he has no leadership qualities.

          2. Mr Rollo says

            And you have NO brain qualities.

          3. AKLady says

            Childish insults say so much about you.

          4. Greg Hernandez says

            We have to use childish insults because people like you do not understand adult conversation.

          5. Gray_Doug says

            He’s a billionaire for crying out loud. He’s travelled, managed, signed paychecks, and more. What did the last guy do before he became president? He was a community organizer. Who has no leadership skills?

          6. Donna Costa says

            AMEN and AMEN !!

          7. AKLady says

            Trump is a glorified salesman.
            Signed paychecks?? Ha. ha, ha …

            His daddy left him property.
            His daddy left him money.
            His faddy left him government contracts.
            .
            The last guy was a U.S. Senator.
            The last guy was a Professor of Constitutional Law.
            The last guy was a civil rights attorney.
            You might want to look up the job description for Community Organizer.
            It clearly describes many of the duties required of U.S. President.

          8. Greg Hernandez says

            President Trump had to do physical labor under his fathers tutelage ,
            His father made money and what kind of parent would not give his child money to start .My parents were poor but they helped all their children.
            It is a duty for a parent to try to give his child a leg up.
            The President had to sign THOUSANDS of paychecks as a world class builder.Obama never signed a paycheck and was never responsible to negotiate with labor unions and government agencies to complete multi- million dollar projects and bring them in early and under budget.
            The president had to negotiate many government contracts because they usually expire when the contracted job is done.
            The president also had to deal with laws and customs in other countries , besides dealing with their officials, something obama had absolutely no experience in.
            The last guy was an Illinois state senator who only sponsored one bill and that was to allow abortion ” doctors ” to just let a baby that survived an abortion to die without giving it anything.Otherwise he just ” Voted ” present ! That is the kind of guy he is. A POS.
            The last guy was a US senator who did nothing of note and sponsored nothing lasting. He occupied a seat while George Soros bought support for him.
            The last guy was an assistant professor of Constitional law who hated the Constitution and did all he could to circumvent it. How long did he work at that ?
            The last guy was “civil rights” attorney who worked as a ” Community Organizer “and who’s neighborhood home is worth 4 million dollars and who had never made more than 50 thousand a year. Hmmmmm ? The ” Neighborhood he was supposedly organizing has one of the worst murder and violent crime rates in the murder capitol of the USA.
            The ” Job Description ” of a community organizer is another lame liberal explanation for doing something they call ” Work ” and there is no legal description.It is another phony liberal make work job. I would not compare ANYTHING Barrack Hussein Obama has doneto the accomplishments of Donald J. Trump.
            Mr. Trump even starred in a TV show while running his multi-billion dollar corporation. Obama couldn’t walk and chew gum in comparison.
            It is clear to the world that Barrack Hussein Obama was a worthless non-entity foisted on the American people by the gullible donkeys of the Democrat party.He isn’t fit to wipe the rear end of President Trump.

          9. AKLady says

            Why do you need to tell these lies?
            Why do you embarrass America this way?
            Why do you believe it is acceptable to lie?
            Why do you believe it is acceptable to repeat lies?
            .
            Oh, and foolish one, government contracts can cover many years, some are valid for decades.

          10. richardwfaith says

            obamA certainly would never qualify for any job I have ever had. I design electronic and mechanical things, build things, play piano, write computer programs, document inventions and explain them to patent attorneys, and create spreadsheets for a wide variety of mathematical and logistical functions. As close as obamA comes to any of the latter is that he has some competency as a singer. If I were ever to get the opportunity to call him up to the podium at a ballgame, I would introduce him as the singer for the National Anthem, NOT because I have any doubt that he could SING it well if he WANTED to, but because I know he HATES THE SONG and would probably refuse to sing it, thus PUBLICLY EXPOSING a bit of his true self.

          11. AKLady says

            Are you nuts?
            Of course an attorney at law would not qualify to built electronics.

          12. richardwfaith says

            Especially a DISBARRED attorney.

          13. AKLady says

            Obama was never disbarred.

            Why do you need to tell this lie?
            Why do you embarrass America this way?
            Why do you believe it is acceptable to lie?
            Why do you believe it is acceptable to repeat lies?

          14. ABO says

            For once you’re right. However I see you conveniently ignore the rest of the story. Everything I’ve read in researching the subject says he gave up his Illinois Law License to avoid disbarment for having given fraudulent information to the Illinois Bar Assn. when he applied for the license. You’re just soooo good at spinning the truth to fit your agenda.

          15. Richard Faith says

            obamA voluntarily placed his law license on inactive status, and rumors developed that he was disbarred. You are correct in saying that he was never disbarred.
            My bad.

          16. AKLady says

            Thank you.
            The Continuing Education requirement is the reason most place their licrmse on inactive status. I cannot quite picture any university admitting any President. Doing do would disrupt the entire campus, causing loss to the entire student body.

          17. Greg Hernandez says

            Yeah, he was a ” Working ” lawyer for about a year. As a state senator he voted “present” about 39 times. He was too busy trying to understand ” Mad Magazine ” to vote for anything important. He is a POS and was picked by the democrap party because he was malleable and had no strong beliefs of his own. Is he still licensed ? I don’t think so.Or was that his wife ? I know one of them is disbarred.

          18. AKLady says

            Neither of the Obamas were disbarred.
            Stop with the leis, already.
            http://www.factcheck.org/2012/06/the-obamas-law-licenses/

          19. Richard Faith says

            Leis are Hawaiian necklaces made of flowers, commonly plumeria.

          20. grafra102 says

            Greg: I THINK SHE WAS, BUT HE NEEDED TO BE TOO, FUCKING MUSLIME!!!

          21. grafra102 says

            Gray: DAMNED HOW RIGHT YOU ARE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

          22. big KAhuna says

            Carol

            Your obviously in denial- your side lost by a landslide- it’s time to grow up act like an adult and stop being part of the problem. Trump has showed more leadership, outstanding cabinet choices, and a work ethic far superior to anyone prior. He’s already done more good for America than Obamas ever did in 8 yrs ( the most damaging and worst POTUS in American history). You and your Party is the big problem in this country: the Dems do not serve everyday Americans; nor are they our friends who care for us! They will lie, cheat, steal, take bribes, allow our enemies to get stronger as we get weaker BY THEIR HAND, and they will destroy people or have those they consider threats to their warped version of the ‘greater good’ put ‘away’, one way or another (Vince Foster, Ron Brown and many others)! They consider God and our Constitution as obstacles to their twisted agenda as both the Diety and the Document both hold them to account for their actions. Republicans are not perfect but with our assistance we can move them to where they are serving U.S. and a greater future, one with Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness as the main points of focus! Now, if we can only get the numbers required to push back all the Illegal and terrorist voters which they are trying to add to their ill-gotten voter contingent.

            The democratic platform has done way to much dammage to our country and those within to ever trust that platform again. The icing on the cake was their selection of a devout Muslim ( OBummer) to serve as our POTUS ( Who swore to be a Christian- nonsense). And now they want to put the most corrupt and lieing candidate
            To ever run – Hildabeast in charge. Their is no end to their corruption and destruction to our values/constitution/Allies. They promote: gay rights, abortion ( responsible for 100 million deaths of fetuses), athiesm ( taking God out of America),illegal immigration, Muslim immigration (people who will try to destroy our way of life- sharia law), socialism ( sponsor is Sorros), communism, ignoring our constitution ( all swore to support it before taking public office), world order/takeover, corruption, and cheating at the polls to get their ways— they are the “SATIN” within America and have lost their way. No wonder a record amount of democrats are abandoning this platform by the thousands after showing its ugly head.
            move on lib bot.

          23. Eric Hartman says

            OMG

          24. big KAhuna says

            Oh yes- the bad news is it’s true and we came close to loosing all our freedoms/country. The good news is Trump is now in charge and no more political correctness hiding the truth. Our schools and colleges must have constitutional scholars as professors– communism and Socialism have no place on our campuses, removal of illegals is a must, Muslim immigration must stop now. Sedition/ Treason must be charged against Sorros/Obama.
            Christians get first presidence on immigration in the future It supports our constitution. Those who want change should find a country that more suits their purpose- leave our country alone.

          25. Eric Hartman says

            Well, that was OMG as in you are paranoid and full of crap as the proverbial HOLIDAY turkey.

          26. big KAhuna says

            Your beyond hope– move on Troll!

          27. Eric Hartman says

            Methinks it is you and your ilk that is beyond hope.

          28. Debbie Bowman says

            No I agree with her… it’s YOU!!!!!

          29. Eric Hartman says

            How nice for you. You agree with her, I disagree with both of you 🙂

          30. brooksandstreams . says

            Dingbats like you cause boils on the butts of the liberals trying to be reasonable in a discussion.

          31. JMICHAEL270 says

            If you actually think that community organizer had any leadership qualities you better get off the oxymorons.

          32. Carol Smith says

            community organizing was a very small part of his list of accomplishments. read his resume.

          33. ELBIB says

            And you do, you blind fool.

          34. Greg Hernandez says

            You are right !!!! OMG you finally realize that Obama has no leadership abilities and was a coward and a phony to boot. Trump makes ozero look like just that , a ZERO.

          35. grafra102 says

            Carol Smith: WHO ARE YOU SPEAKING OF??????????????

          36. Gray_Doug says

            The issue is not the EO, it’s insubordination . . . defying the boss before the public . . . failure to use the process of disagreeing with the boss before throwing the insubordination in the public’s face. She’s fired for that. You can disagree about how the President does things; but, when he is the boss, you follow the process in house and give him options. Punch the boss in the face before the public? Plan on packing your desk and being tossed out the door.

          37. AKLady says

            Her first duty is to the Constitution.
            Her second duty is to the Law.
            Punch American people in the face, plan on being impeached.

          38. Gray_Doug says

            Sorry you disagree. We’ll have to agree to disagree, AKLady. Poor Barrack had a temper, fired experts that tried to help him, verbally slapped the stuffins out of Constitution and lawful authority before the public, constantly lied, refused to act to bring peace to the races . . . need I go on? He was the laughing stock before world leadership. He hated Israel and Great Britain. He deliberately attempted to interfere with free elections in Israel. He deliberately freed (pardoned) traitors, murders and terrorists (bad dudes that left Gitmo and returned to their form of jihad). Your memory surely isn’t that bad. Again, you and I will agree to disagree . . . that’s the American way.

          39. AKLady says

            Why do you need to tell these lies?
            Why do you embarrass America this way?
            Why do you believe it is acceptable to lie?
            Why do you believe it is acceptable to repeat lies?

          40. Greg Hernandez says

            Hey AK , it is no lie. Obama is the worst president America ever had.
            It is no lie that he lost respect from just about every ally and every enemy this country had.
            It is no lie that his inexperience led to the worst financial recovery since FDR.
            It is no lie that he was the laughing stock of NATO and the EU.
            He kissed the ass of every muslim leader while insulting our only faithful ally in the middle East, Israel.
            He drew a red line in the sand only in the swamp of his mind.
            He insulted England , Japan , France, Canada, Mexico and most of the rest of countries who were our friends while kissing up to the murderer Castro brothers. Putin laughed in his face.
            I don’t know why you are such a compulsive liar AK but your continued BS on articles that are somewhat pro conservative show you just are another democrap / liberal/ socialist snowflake with no real thoughts of your own, very little understanding of what truth means and only showing the one good thing about yourself. You are a fine example of snowflake mentality.. keep spreading manure until someone falls for it or because of it.

          41. AKLady says

            Why do you lie?
            The Cuban embargo failed long before Obama became President.
            Save your insults for someone you can impress with your immaturity and ignorance.

          42. Debbie Bowman says

            Peat and repeat

          43. AKLady says

            You cannot even get the insult correct.
            The correct version is “Pete and Repeat”.
            Is there any more ignorance you would like to share?

          44. Debbie Bowman says

            Up yours say as I wanna say it you hypocrite

          45. AKLady says

            Why do you embarrass America this way?

          46. grafra102 says

            Gray: AND HAD TEMPER TANTRUMS LIKE A 2 YEAR OLD!!!!

          47. Greg Hernandez says

            READ the article and if you try real hard you may see where you are so wrong. Otherwise realize you are just making a donkey out of yourself.

          48. grafra102 says

            Greg: I CALL THAT AN ASS HOLE!!!! LOL!!!

          49. Debbie Bowman says

            Well if your not American pack your bags and get out!!!

          50. AKLady says

            Your punctuation and language useage clearly documents that you are either not an American or you are a school dropout.
            Which is it?

          51. richardwfaith says

            Mobs of THUGS paid by soro$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, that is.

          52. AKLady says

            Why do you need to tell this lie?

            Why do you embarrass America this way?

            Why do you believe it is acceptable to lie?

            Why do you believe it is acceptable to repeat lies?

          53. Greg Hernandez says

            Why do you not understand TRUTH. ? Can’t you even read what’s printed on a bunch of those signs. We’ve had 8 years of embarrassment to America and that is OVER and done.. Didn’t you hear the testimony of the democrat operatives that tried to infiltrate and disturb Trump rallies ? You are the fool and it is zombies like you propagating the lies.

          54. ABO says

            Liberalism, Greg is a serious mental disorder. Cognitive dissonance is one of its symptoms. AKLoony is a prime example.

          55. AKLady says

            What about the right-wingers who did the same thing at Hillary rallies?
            You are the are foolish and ignorant.
            It is the brainwashed, like you, who are propagating the lies.

            The right- wing tried to join Democratic campaign staffs,

            http://mmc-news.com/politics/a-rightwing-activist-tried-to-infiltrate-a-democratic-campaign-it-didnt-go-well.html

            http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/another-okeefe-like-infiltrator-unmasked-mid-sting_us_57b4d490e4b034dc73257c61

            https://www.pinterest.com/pin/329536897717273660/

          56. ABO says

            Just for once try posting something relevant rather than your usual cut and paste blather. Apparently you are incapable of actually carrying on a normal conversation without resorting to your usual utterly baseless insults and accusations. Although, your myopic liberal mindset of course precludes the possibility that you would ever carry on a normal discussion without the insults and accusations so I assume you’ll just keep posting your childish cut and paste nonsense.

          57. Greg Hernandez says

            Yes, crowds of brain dead libtards who cannot put 2 thoughts together without screaming ” Bigot “, ” Chump”, ” Inclusion”, Racism and whatever is the walking dead mantra of the day.Mobs of trash , destroying other peoples property while screaming about love, when they should be thrown in jail and forced to pay for damages they’ve done while on their rampages. In truth, the ” Chump ” has done more in a week than the clown ozero did in 8 years.
            Those idiots and the Democrap garbage in DC were the reasons we now have a real president who works FOR the people. He has chosen a fine cabinet, a truly excellent judge for the Supreme Court and will do whatever he has to do to protect our citizens. Cry all you want and let your mind melt, Snowflake , Donald Trump is the President and “Oh what a relief it is ” after 8 years of the worst “Occupier ” of the White House in American History.
            Read the article , TRY to understand the concept and if that doesn’t work, go down to Mommy’s basement and hide for the next 8 years and cry yourself into a stupor.

          58. Debbie Bowman says

            Lovin it!!!!!

          59. Greg Hernandez says

            Have you seen how many swamp dwellers have been fired from the VA and EPA ?…Lot’s more to come.

          60. Mathew Molk says

            Law or no law,,,,which would go down to presidents set for decades, what would you do if YOUR lawyer sided with someone that was suing you? She was supposed to represent the President, not his opposition.

            This case is dead as a hammer.

          61. Chiefbuck says

            Who do you think is behind and supporting of the mobs of loons causing the damage? In case you really don’t know it’s your fellow progressive democrat parasites.

          62. grafra102 says

            glorybe2 : I HOPE YOU ARE SPEAKING OF “ODUMBO”??? State your person next time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

        4. Pepot says

          Which rule of law? The law of communist?

        5. Mathew Molk says

          Fool,,,,The rule of law was set up by Harry Truman….and Clintor, And what’s his name that is playing golf in Florida.

        6. David says

          “The rule of law”? Do you even have a clue what “the rule of law” even is?

        7. james gould says

          When you purposely disregard your superior, you need to quit or you’re going to be fired.

          1. NavymanBill says

            James, pretty basic, isn’t it?

        8. desert fox says

          You are as stupid as she is but then you are a demoncrat so its expected. We should have all be rioting and throwing a temper tantrum when the black muslim ash whole was signing his executive orders—but he did it hidden and the media waited until they were enacted before telling the public.

        9. NavymanBill says

          Bulls##t. The function of the DOJ and the Attorney General is to ADVISE the President. If she didn’t care to follow his orders, she should have resigned. She was INSUBORDINATE-and got fired.CYA!

        10. AKLady says

          For once we agree.

        11. franco leon says

          looks like your “applause” doesn’t help Yates. if you’re a leftist liberal lawyer, you can say Trump doesn’t care about the rule of law.

      2. Carol Smith says

        trump is proven to be corrupt. trump is well known for his daily lies and spicer et al. have to clean it up. ms. yates and lynch have integrity and are a hell of a lot smarter than trump. yates was fired for upholding the rule of law. trump was fanning his ego.

        1. jerrycollie says

          You are one of the fools that think aliens have the same rights as American citizens, to come and go in this country.

        2. Mr Rollo says

          And your brain “cell” is in need of major repair, my little buttercup.

        3. Retired says

          Their integrity is like toilet paper used to erase the brown stain on the few brain cells they poses.

        4. Donna Costa says

          And you, Carol Smith, are proven to be brain-damaged!!
          When you make terrible accusations like that, you should
          back them up with facts!! You have no facts? then SHUT UP!!

        5. Mathew Molk says

          What planet have you been on? Not a word of your gibberish ever happened.

          Hey gang. Looks like another NWO Marxist who is in full panic mode has gone over the edge. – Alternate facts, Rewritten history and hallucinations.

        6. Greg Hernandez says

          Yates and Lynch are both liberal liars. Trump has been ” Proven ” to be an honest businessman, true to his word and a good employer to his workers. You are a liar and a fool for believing the democrap propaganda. Spicer has been cleaning up the lies of the LAME stream media.

          1. Carol Smith says

            trump’s ‘proven’ record all comes from the right wing media. there is tons of credible info on his mistreatment of workers, nonpayments to people, scams, etc. then here is he human trafficking charge regarding his model agency. racketeering charges, one of those being trump university, in which he recently had to pay millions to keep from going to court. u must have missed all that.

      3. astrc says

        YEA, and OBAMA, former A.G. “crooked”, “Eric Holder”, who should have been, “Dis-barred” & Charge with the Criminal crimes & violations of his “Oath of Office, & the Laws. (Having a part in the “Selling of Illegal Automatic Weapons to the Mexican Drug Cartels, and used against our American citizens & in the killing of one of our Boarder Patrol Officer, for a START), and a “LOT more”.

        1. Mathew Molk says

          The fat lady hasn’t had her solo yet. It aint over ’till it’s over and sure as hell isn’t over yet.

          Jeff has not gone into session yet. I say heads will roll.

          1. John Otradovec says

            Did you mean Rosie ,the mouth.?

        2. AKLady says

          Ha, ha, ha, ha …
          Name one administration whicy has nt provided weapons to terrorists and/or revolutionaries. Are you just very young or I it poorly informed?

          1. astrc says

            I “Wish ” I was, “very young” Again, & “YES”, your are right about, Most U.S. Administrations have PROVIDED, GIVEN, or LEFT), weapons to other counties,( “During WAR), & to Allies,) & there are “Gun Dealers”, who sell to Any counties that will buy them.
            However this “Selling of Illegal Automatic Weapons to the Mexican Drug Cartels”, by the OBAMA Admin. appointed , “Former A.G. “Eric Holder” & the DEA Admin.
            (for which we do not know the “REAL” reasons behind it) & then used to murder one of our boarder patrol officer, & more) was a clean violation of our Criminal codes. YOU show us, ONE past Admin. that has committed this type of violation of law?

          2. AKLady says

            Cite the law, paragraph and chapter.
            Also, tell us which diploma mill you studied law at.

          3. astrc says

            NO, you can “look them up”, if you know so much about what you are mouthing off about.. & cite them.. “Diploma mill” ? (I will list ALL of my, “Diploma Mill”, (Education, training, & experience, & knowledge, etc..), AFTER you list ALL of yours, Do you DENY that this, “Fast & Furious” , Illegal selling of guns to the Mexican Drug cartels DID’NT happen?

          4. AKLady says

            “Project Gunrunner”, “Fast and Furious”, “Wide Receiver”, “Castaway”, “Too Hot to Handle” … Maybe you should read “The Unpopular History of the United States by Uncle Sam Himself” by Harris Dickson,
            Frederick A. Stokes Company, 1917 – United States

          5. AKLady says

            Plagiarization is stealing
            You are a thief.

          6. NavymanBill says

            Astrc, careful. AKLady is a very sick person. She is an ace at distractors, but also a pathological liar. She has stated that she served TWO tours as an Army Medical Officer (Doctor) in VietNam-1970-71. Only problem-the Army didn’t HAVE women doctors in those days. She also told me last year in another thread that she DID NOT serve in VietNam, but graduated from USUHS in DC. Only problem-the first class didn’t graduate until 1980-five years after VietNam ended.She has told so many falsehoods, she can’t remember what she said to who. Being on this thread gives her lonely and empty life some meaning. Use caution. A very disturbed person.

          7. astrc says

            From “One Navy Man to another”, I came to that same conclusion, but just had a moment to goat her. Thanks for the Info.

          8. NavymanBill says

            Good to hear from you. Have a good friend who was Army Nurse 1LT at Long Binh RVN 68=69. Now a big player at State Dept. SHE NEVER SAW, nor met, nor heard rumor of a female Army Medical Corps Officer/surgeon. LOTS of nurses, some admin types (WAC still existed then) and a few female maint types (motorpool, repairs, etc.) She never even saw any female MDs back in the States!!I went in service in 1972-and I think I am older than our “friend”.(And I was 17 1/2.in july 72.) It just doesn’t add up Take care..

          9. astrc says

            Hell you’re just a “young guy” I Join the Washington National Guard before I was 15, in 1954, & when I “tried” to transfer into the Navy I was 16, I was all processed (4A), than the recruited took a “better look” at my Birth certificate,
            my attempt to change 1939 to 1938, didn’t come out to good, and he told me “to come back when I turned 17. Which I did in 1956, Attended the First Boot camp
            Co. 443, @ the News navel base at San Diego. Thanks for your Service.

          10. grafra102 says

            ASTRC: RIGHT ON SIR, AND YOU WERE MY AGE WHEN I WENT INTO THE AIR FORCE!!! THANK ALL OUR VETERANS THAT COMMENT ON THIS POST.

            VETERAN, UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, 1956/1958

          11. Michael Dennewitz says

            Vietnam vet. ’62 to ’68..USN

          12. Debbie Bowman says

            Thanks to you all for your services

          13. JJ says

            Amen!

          14. grafra102 says

            NavymanBill, : YES, YOU ARE RIGHT, AND PEOPLE SUCK INTO HER FUCKING SHIT LIES!!!! “BEWARE EVERYONE”!!!

          15. JJ says

            She sounds exactly like Obama’s sister. They both can lie like dogs

          16. grafra102 says

            astrc: DON’T BOTHER WITH THIS FUCKING (IT), ALL IS A LIBTURD. I HEAR SHE GETS PAID FOR ALL THE ONE PEOPLE THAT RESPONDS TO HER. DON’T HELP TO FILL HER CHECKING ACCOUNT!!!

          17. JJ says

            Oh Lord, she is back! She is a turd and turds don’t have brain cells.

          18. NavymanBill says

            Probably the same place you went to Med School! (roflmao)

          19. AKLady says

            Thank you.
            Your input is always welcome
            It says so much about you.

          20. NavymanBill says

            And you. AKlady, I am actually enjoying this. You are a pathetic soul, but you aren’t stupid. This is fun.

            Please continue-one more time: You have said you were two tours in Viet Nam 1970 and 1971. I’ll be talking to DA about that tomorrow.

            Where were you stationed in “Nam?

            What unit were you in?

            Who was your C.O./C.O.s?

            have a nice evening.

          21. AKLady says

            Have a nice evening.
            Try not to insult too many people with your foolishness.

          22. NavymanBill says

            Not foolishness , AKLady. I am just looking for the truth.

            You stated that you served in the VietNam War-two tours 1970 and 1971.Where were you stationed?

            What unit were you with?

            Who was your C.O./C.O.s?

          23. AKLady says

            Find someone else to harass.
            You are now blocked.
            I suggest you obtain a mental health professional.

          24. NavymanBill says

            I guess it’s tough accepting someone who calls you out on your lies, and you can’t respond!! ROFLMAO!!!

            BTW, I had a great weekend-I have a real life with my family. I don’t have to annoy people I disagree with to give my empty life some meaning.

          25. AKLady says

            I’d love to have a great weekend with my family,
            but you see they are in Afghanistan fighting your war.

          26. NavymanBill says

            AKLady, I thought YOU BLOCKED ME?!! Apparently you just keep coming back for more!!?? . Again, I guess I give your empty life some meaning- Pathetic. And NOBODY MADE YOUR KIDS FIGHT ANYONE ANYWHERE!! The DRAFT ENDED IN 1973! If YOU pushed them into it, based on your heroic stories of the two tours you DIDN’T have in VietNam, THAT’S YOUR PROBLEM! You told me about how you made them go into it and pull their own weight LAST YEAR when you ADMITTED THAT YOU DIDN’T SERVE IN VIETNAM. (Obviously I have a better memory than you do.) But keep coming back and embarrassing yourself. I have a call into USPHS today about ANY USPHS who served in VietNam. We’ll find out, won’t we.

          27. Debbie Bowman says

            Thought you were blocking lol

          28. AKLady says

            …Targeted harassment — posted or encouraged others to post harassing comments or hate speech targeting me, other individuals, or groups

          29. blogengeezer says

            Good questions. Been following your exchange with the repetitive copy paste robot. One thing aside from our dog tag numbers, we immediately recall our CO’s. Every last one of them.

            I still to this day remember being intrigued by the jagged shrapnel scar from a MIG, …completely through the face… of my ‘Top’. He was one seriously experienced Master Sergeant, with his 20 + and two live fire wars active. If he ordered me, as a ‘Staff’ Sgt, to do Anything, I and the entire group would immediately accomplish Anything he desired. :>)

          30. NavymanBill says

            Hi “Blo”. Yeah, a ‘World Class” disseminator and prevaricator. Everytime you get close to the truth, her story changes. I have determined that she did NOT do TWO tours of duty in VietNam as an Army Medical Officer. I got that directly from the US Army Womens Museum at Fort Lee. I was on the phone with the Director and the Chief Archivist. I called them, and they returned my call! The numbers and who she “tried to represent herself as” JUST didn’t work. THEN she starts in with USPHS-like we don’t KNOW about it. I know a nurse in it NOW, and an old girlfriend’s brother worked in the Indian Health Service. It would be sadly comical-like a female Walter Mitty-except she is SUCH a POSEUR, a good look in the mirror would probably KILL her! Pathetic, but I have known too many like her to let it pass..

          31. blogengeezer says

            Recently got into a heated discussion with a ‘partial’ native American, where wife works part time. They have attitude a bit commie, to say the least.

            Whenever I corrected her with the hard ‘Facts’ on the subjects surrounding tribal affairs, customs and lack of productive self motivation [non productive Motorola plants] vs reduced payments received, she got into my face and glaring into my eyes said, “Well that doesn’t make it right”. Motorola went belly up on the Rez.

            I worked the ‘Rez’ for over 40 years and in that time, met a few people, most in the financial and med profession, and saw the ‘Real’ situation with nanny govt running their lives.

            I suspect a major sector of AK population is a similar, dependency addicted recipient of govt funding, perpetually angry because it is never quite enough…

            Sec of the Interior years ago, James Watt, said that… “if you want to see the Communist Government in action, go live on the US Reservations for a time”. or to that effect…

            Of course, after that statement, the liberal Leftist Progressives drove him out of DC. He returned to his private business, as a western states financial advisor on dealings with Govt.

            Ironic, his immediate clients were the Indian Reservations…. paying him to get them more Govt funding.

            After the way he was treated in DC, he quickly obliged them, using his insider expertise, to Really get them some Big bucks, of which he got a percentage 🙂

            Large population of AK is non productive native Inuit and others on welfare, EBT, SNAP, Food credits, child allowances and Section Eight, in addition to Govt healthcare. Of course it is never enough, and they always demand more.

            Watch Alaska State Troopers on you tube, to see the real situations across that vast state. The money flows in and the sleds and dogs of the old ways are traded for snowmobiles.

            Pretty dead end life in those remote villages, dismal in winter. No wonder such a drug problem. With federal and state money, they buy drugs and alcohol. An associate’s son is law enforcement in AK and sees the harsh realities.

            He said that the fatty monthly oil allowance given to all inhabitants of AK by Big Oil [Sarah Palin helped write that contract on depletion allowances], is all but dead now. During fat times of the past, an extra K a month was avg for him.

          32. NavymanBill says

            Hey, Blo. Interesting post. I’ve spent some time in Alaska. Interesting place-but it was a while ago, and as you said, they were flush with the oil money. I know about the Inuits as well-I remember seeing them sleeping under the overpasses by 4th St in Anchorage. Certainly not all of them, but enough that it was a problem, and every now and then one would freeze to death. The situations on most of the reservations is tough even in more temperate climates. Had an old girlfriend in college who was from a tribe in NC. She was smart and good looking, but had a real self-destructive side to her. it was kinda sad.

          33. grafra102 says

            blogengeezer: YES, I REMEMBER MY DOG TAG TOO AND MY SUPERIOR, I BET SHE CAN NOT GIVE YOU ANY OF THAT INFO BECAUSE SHE IS A FUCKING FAKE!!!!

          34. Robert Uda says

            She’s not going to answer your questions because she can’t. Top Secret. LOL!

          35. NavymanBill says

            Robert, I stopped dealing with “her” (?) months ago. Just someone getting their jollies stirring the pot. Everytime you catch her out, the story changes. Not worth the effort. Have a friend who was a Army Nurse-terrific lady – in 3rd Surgical Hospital at Long Binh in ’68-69. ALL of the women were billeted together -for their safety-and she told me that she never saw nor heard of any Army female MD’s in “Nam-or even in the States when she DEROS’d. .And if there were, she would have known about them, as they were pretty rare in those days, and would have been billeted close by, in “Nam or in the states. I don’t bother with this other person anymore. not worth the effort.

          36. NavymanBill says

            Aklady, I spoke to the Director and Archivist at the US Army Women’s Museum at Fort lee, Virginia yesterday. There were FIVE women Doctors/Medical Corps Officers in VietNam throughout the entire conflict. You weren’t one of them. (I don’t know your name, but you didn’t match any of their profiles, as pertains to rank, dates of tour, etc.)

          37. AKLady says

            Internet fantasy, is it not beautiful to behold?

          38. NavymanBill says

            There were FIVE US ARMY Female Medical Officers in Viet Nam. That is per the US Army’s OWN Museum for Military Women at Fort Lee, VA. Their records are the OFFICIAL records. You were not one of the five.

          39. AKLady says

            “There were FIVE US ARMY Female Medical Officers in Viet Nam.”
            Suggest you read your post.
            .
            Have a nice evening.
            Try not to insult too many people with your foolishness.

          40. NavymanBill says

            AKLADY, I just did, the same as the last two times. There were FIVE US ARMY MEDICAL CORPS OFFICERS IN VIETNAM. That is from 1961-1975. Not very many, by any measure. And YOU DID NOT MATCH any of the five women’s profiles. I’m not insulting anyone. You are insulting those who served there by saying you did when you didn’t. I actually believe that you did serve in the Army Medical Corps, and you did go to USUHS. But you did NOT serve two Tours in VietNam as an Army Medical Corps Officer.

          41. AKLady says

            Those with eyes who cannot see.

          42. NavymanBill says

            Oh, I see. The story changes. “Catch Me If You Can.” (lol.lol) I have my sources at USPHS, too. And NOAA and the French Foreign Legion, etc. I’ll get back to you on this latest one. It’ll take a few days, but I already know you didn’t serve two tours in VietNam in 1970 and 1971-not as the Army Medical Officer Major that you have said that you were. USPHS officers use naval ranks, but aren’t in the Navy, and I’m pretty sure they don’t leave the US/US Territories. But I’ll find out and get back to you!!

          43. AKLady says

            Maybe you should have read my post more slowly.

            Try again: Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service wear many different uniforms and serve in many agencies.

          44. AKLady says

            Plagiarization is stealing.
            You are a thief.

          45. evangelinebrabant says

            But not in various branches of the U.S. Military, as you claimed you did.

          46. AKLady says

            You are incorrect. I suggest you look up facts before posting.
            In fact, every medical officer wearing a U.S. Coast Guard uniform is part of the Commissioned Corps of the U.S. Public Health Service.

          47. grafra102 says

            NavymanBill: “CATCH ME IF YOU CAN” she is probably too damned fucking fat and she would fall on her face!!! HA, HA, HA!!!! STUPID IT!!!!

          48. grafra102 says

            NavymanBill: OH SHIT I JUST SPILLED MY COKE AND BOURBON ON MY KEY BOARD!!!! LOL!!!

          49. AKLady says

            I would suggest you do further research into the issue of women who served in Vietnam.

          50. NavymanBill says

            AKLADY, I have ALREADY called you out! You are a LIAR. There is NO RECORD of ANY Female Medical Corps Officer matching YOUR description that served in VietNam.-AND NONE OF THE FIVE DID TWO TOURS-as you have said you did. And you are younger than I am, and I went in service in 1972 at 17 1/2. Stop embarrassing yourself and picking fights you can’t win. GO AWAY!

          51. AKLady says

            Stop embarrassing yourself and picking fights you can’t win. GO AWAY!
            I would suggest you do further research into the issue of women who served in Vietnam. Recognition of women’s war efforts are still missing from as far back as WW I. Get a life and stop issuing insults about things you know little or nothing about. Younger than you are — another assumption. Apparently, you have forgotten the rhyme about ass-u-me.

          52. NavymanBill says

            AKlady, I told you last month to stay away from me, and I wouldn’t respond. Instead, you pick up a 9 month old thread and come back at me?? You are the biggest LIAR on this page!!! Telling ME to go away? Read your own posts, you phony loser!. You can’t even remember what lies you have told!! Army Medical Corps Officer with TWO tours in VietNam? I TOLD YOU ALREADY-I spoke to the Director AND the Curator of the US Army Woman’s Museum at Fort lee, VA. There were FIVE Women Medical Corps Officers in VietNam from 1965-1972. NONE served there twice-EXCEPT YOU!!! (ROFLMAO!!) I’m sure you are going to tell me that THEY ARE LYING ALSO?? You’re pathetic! You told me you graduated from USUHS, Fair enough, but the FIRST Graduating class was in 1980!!! (The Army’s combat role in Nam ended in 1973! You also said something about enrolling in Charter Oak College(?) in CT, but that only opened in 1973. All you have to do is tell me what unit you were in ON EITHER Tour (lol) in Nam, and who your CO was!!. Or were you an MD in the US Public Health service then?(ROFL) You told me about growing up in a military family(?) in CT(?) in the early 60s. Remember? That was when you were telling everyone to “get educated” like you. You ADMITTED that you were younger than me!! I even believe you about Charter oak College and USUHS, but YOU DIDN’T SERVE IN NAM, AND WE ALL KNOW IT!! And the two husbands killed there.??(What -you married at 15 and then again at 17? (LOL) I realize we all give your pathetic and empty life some meaning, but until you tell me what units you were in, and who your COs were, I suggest you go bother someone else.And the schoolyard rhyme reference?? You’re losing your touch!! Blah, blah, blah, repeat ad nauseum! (lmao)

          53. AKLady says

            You have the ability to block my posts. I suggest you do so.
            You have impressed me, however, not in the way you desire.

            You obviously support refusal to recognize the contributions women have made to this Nation in times of war. Why you wish to demean them is beyond my understanding.

            Dear Navyman, do you realize that in 1973, what is now Charter Oak College, did not have a campus, staff or classrooms? Apparently, you are under the impression that someone would have to be present in Connecticut to be enrolled in a degree program at what was originally “The Connecticut Board for State Academic Awards”.

            Dear Navyman, I never set foot in a classroom at what is now known as Charter Oak College. In fact, Charter Oak College did not have a campus in 1973. Dear Navyman, I tested out of my undergraduate degree except for the chemistry labs and biology labs required for medical school.

            Now, take your ignorance, foolishness, insults, les and go harass someone else. Oh, and foolish one who assumes, assumes, and assaumes, I was married first at age 17. Oh, and by the way, I also obtained my high school diploma through testing. And just for grins, I happen to be a member od Mensa.

            For your information, one can also obtain a college degree by testing through the New York Regency Program.

          54. NavymanBill says

            Blah, blah, blah, ad nauseum. I have NO problem with women, in the military or out. I have referenced my 1LT Army Nurse friend-the genuine article-a year tour in Nam-She never SAW a female Medical Corps Officer -in Nam, or back in “the world” when she DEROS’d. YOU keep misrepresenting yourself-and I and a lot of others on here WILL NOT LET YOU GET AWAY WITH IT. You are a LIAR AND A FRAUD AND A FAKE AND A POSER! All you have to do is answer me-what unit(s) were you in, in Nam, and who were your COs?. I can take it from there. Simple question. For someone as “brilliant” as you, it should be a simple answer!! LAST THING! YOU ARE HARASSING ME, YOU SIMPLETON! YOU INITIATED THIS CONTACT!! IF you can’t stand the heat, go play somewhere else, you sick woman. UNIT and CO’s , all I’m asking for! Night, night!

          55. AKLady says

            Good-by.
            You have been blocked.
            You began the insult fest.

          56. NavymanBill says

            AKLady (and all reading this) You said you were blocking me about a year ago. (lol, lol) . That is fine. TO ALL WHO READTHIS- I have had enough of AKLADY and her nonsense about two tours in Viet Nam as an Army Medical Corps officer when she would have been about 15 y/o. And had not one but TWO of her three husbands killed in VietNam. And became a Doctor out of USUHS in DC-which graduated its first class in 1980. I have decided that I am going to contact STOLEN VALOR on her. We know ENOUGH about her. Graduate of Charter oak State College in CT, Graduate of USUHS-commissioned into the Army, and TWO husbands killed in Viet Nam!Quite a resume. When I finally get some answers- I will post on here for all to see. Should prove very informative.

          57. AKLady says

            Harassment — posted or encouraged others to post harassing comments or hate speech targeting me, other individuals, or groups

          58. AKLady says

            Harassment # 2— posted or encouraged others to post harassing comments or hate speech targeting me, other individuals, or groups

          59. AKLady says

            Harassment #3 — posted or encouraged others to post harassing comments or hate speech targeting me, other individuals, or groups

          60. AKLady says

            Harassment #4 — posted or encouraged others to post harassing comments or hate speech targeting me, other individuals, or groups

          61. NavymanBill says

            AKLady, I thought you blocked me!) Repeating the same charge FOUR times. Very sane (lol) . I’m NOT harassing you. I AM VERIFYING you. Have a message into the POW network-they are good at verification, and also to stolen Valor. Will be contacting several other agencies. Not trying to harass you, unless you consider exposing your fraudulent persona “Harrassment.” Have a nice day. I’ll get back to you.

          62. grafra102 says

            NavymanBill: I am having fun at the “IT’S” expense…LOL, I HOPE I DON’T PISS MY PANTS!!!!

          63. Debbie Bowman says

            That would be….YOU

          64. AKLady says

            Yes, Debbie, that would be me.
            I served America in uniform.
            What have you done, besides play childish games?

          65. Robert Uda says

            Liberalism is a mental disorder, which requires brain surgery, especially for this nut of a woman. LOL!

          66. grafra102 says

            NavyMan: WE ARE AWARE THERE ARE NO RECORDS, SHE/IT IS FULL OF SHIT!!!

          67. AKLady says

            Why do you need to tell these lies?
            Why do you embarrass America this way?
            Why do you believe it is acceptable to lie?
            Why do you believe it is acceptable to repeat lies?

          68. Debbie Bowman says

            Look who’s talking stupo

          69. AKLady says

            Targeted harassment — posted or encouraged others to post harassing comments or hate speech targeting me, other individuals, or groups

          70. grafra102 says

            NavymanBill: Don’t reply to the damned stupid mental retard with an IQ of “0”!!

          71. AKLady says

            Plagiarization is stealing.
            You are a thief.

          72. GODBlessRealAmerica!!! says
          73. AKLady says

            .
            Plagiarization is stealing
            You are a thief.

          74. Robert Uda says

            That list just proves “Liberalism is a mental disorder.”

          75. Debbie Bowman says

            Cite it yourself fat mouth!!!!

          76. AKLady says

            You are not an American.
            You cannot write correctly.
            Are you a Russian troll?

          77. obamasucks says

            The reason I heard was so the DEA could catch drug runners with the firearms so they could further apply pressure on abolishing, destroying and/or eliminating our Second Amendment.
            It worked just as they planned. But then someone(as usual) got trigger-happy, loosed a few rounds. That opened the way for both sides to start blasting away. In the aftermath a Border Patrol Agent was shot and died.
            That part wasn’t in the plan and was what got the pot of beans knocked over. Thankfully, our Cowardly Congress and ‘I Know Nothing!’ FBI banded together and HID everything as well as they could from the public. But, leaks happen and we found out. And NOTHING happened. No one went to jail or was yelled at.

          78. astrc says

            I admit that as a former Law Enforcement officer, I haven’t had the opportunity to review the WHOLE Report/records, If what you say is true, it could be a case of “Entrapment” on the DEA & A.G. Eric Holder’s involvement ?, However it was a criminal violation of the law, in “Selling illegal Automatic Weapons” to the Mexican Drug cartel, for “Any Reason”, and someone should have been “Charged” (Eric Holder #1.? ) No matter the INTENT, is sure as hell was not for the “Good of our country”. Thank You for your reply.

          79. grafra102 says

            astrc: YOU CAN ADD FUCKING “ODUMBO” WITH IT!!!

          80. Mary says

            Agree

          81. Warren says

            I don’t agree with you claiming they were Automatic Weapons they were sold to Holder buyers from US Gun Stores had to be Semi Automatic unless the DEA gave Fully Automatic Guns to sell that would make it another offence.

          82. mlmaston says

            Any way you look at it. It is the very definition of Strawman Purchasing followed closely by blatant Gun-Running. Both are crimes.

          83. Warren says

            In 2009, the State Department approved sales of 18,709 weapons to Mexico, almost 10 times the number sold to illegal straw buyers in Fast and Furious, and more guns than the U.S. sold to either Afghanistan or Iraq. That number includes $20 million in semi- and “fully-automatic” weapons.

          84. Tim says

            Ronald Reagan declared ( War on Drugs ) when he was president and the ‘Entrapment’ went out the window. Still to this day it’s in effect. Any law enforcement officer can talk you into buying drugs from them, and turn you around and bust you for the drugs you just bought from him. If you even talk to them about anything that is consider drug related they got you on conspiracy

          85. dinkerduo says

            They also gave the excuse that they were tracking “straw buyers”—not likely–or as likely as “a video” caused the Benghazi attacks! And those guns are still showing up at different crime sites!
            I think they were given to ISIS who are in Mexico all along the border at different sites–and they were used to train Mexico’s drug cartels to fight along with ISIS against the U.S. We’ll see if they don’t attack us someday–in different cities to create as mush havoc as possible!

          86. Janelle says

            But the people in this country did and are arming up. I am sure in spite of lots of contrary evidence……the 535 in Congress are well aware of that. And face it, there are a lot more of us.

          87. Debbie Bowman says

            Got that right!!!!

          88. JJ says

            You damn straight!

          89. grafra102 says

            astrc: OH SHIT, THAT BITCH LIBTURD IS BACK AGAIN!!!. LET’S GIVE HER A “FOAB” UP HER/IT’S ASS, I AM TELLING YOU JUST DELETE HER FROM THE COMMENTS, SHE HAS HER NOSE UP “ODUMBOS ASS”. OMG HAVEN’T HEARD FROM IT IN AWHILE AND FELT GREAT!!!!

          90. Warren says

            Well the biggest violation was the same Administration when obama & hillary created the Arab Spring deposing Gaddafi to get his Weapons Cache to be sent from Benghazi to Qatar & Turkey then forwarded to Al Qaeda in Syria that became ISIS on top of that had our Air Force drop them more supplies & Weapons by several Mistake? drops in an otherwise empty Desert. With the technology we have today our Air Force is not even close to being that incompetent. A Muslim Brotherhood Gift courtesy of the Marxist Muslim Mutt

          91. Debbie Bowman says

            Another slippery slip for dumbos to approve it’s ok for them to do it but cry if we do. Boohooo

          92. Mary says

            ERIC HOLDER should be charged with CRIMES during his employment
            under huseeins administration.

          93. Tom says

            Must agree OUR government is just as giutly as any , but two wrongs don’t make a right

          94. AKLady says

            Every administration has undertaken arms sales.
            Fact is fact,
            Congress authorizes it.
            You elect Congress.

          95. Tim says

            Donald J Trump administration!! That’s who Ha, ha, ha, ha….. Also President Bush (44) had stopped the sell of the weapons to the Mexican cartel & the Eric Holder and Odumber administration started it back with no concern that the weapons could be used to kill the very people who protect us. So yea, both of them no good black bastard are guilty & should be hung by the neck or spend the rest of there life in prison..

          96. AKLady says

            The realities America continues to deny: racism and sexism.

          97. Tim says

            I have never in life Denied being a racist or showing sexism.That’s like saying I’m afraid of the truth and hide from it like a scared liberal. I believe my race (WHITE) is now & always has been the most dominant race in history. Call it racism if you want to, but it’s a fact . No female is superior to a male in any way. They’re here to breed and be a man’s partner not his competition. A man who lets a female make the decisions is no man, that would be a sissy weak ass bitch-boy.another Fact

        3. Brad Fisher says

          It’s shocking to say the least.

      4. Andrew says

        I totally agree with you Irish1919.

      5. evangelinebrabant says

        It’s a Democrat thing.

    3. gerald kaminski says

      She did exactly what Senator Sessions, during her confirmation hearing, advised was her legal duty to do and what she advised Senator Sessions she would do.

      1. Progressive Republican says

        Ooooh, facts.

        I’m certain that’ll go over well here in FRWNJland.

        1. AKLady says

          Amen, exactly!

      2. Garys_opinion says

        And what exactly was that?

    4. AKLady says

      Ignorance and sewer language; Trump’s America …

      1. Col C says

        Marxism and terrorism, Obama, Hillary, and Soros nation, what a good combo, love the new American look, beautiful woman in a hijab of bondage, nothing says America like that. Nothing says freedom like Sharia Law, in which women have no rights, only Muslim men, and gays are executed, that America sounds so much better than turning our nation back over to American citizens and immigrants who actually want freedom, not the bondage they came from.

        1. AKLady says

          “[H]ijab of bondage, yet more assumptions from an ignorant right-winger.
          Women of several religions sects cover their hair.
          If you read the Bible, you will understand why.
          Oh, and bigoted one, freedom of religion is a Constitutional right in America.

          Do you claim that America is a Christian nation? — Christian Sharia in the U.S.
          Demands that same-sex marriage be illegal — Christian Sharia in the U.S.
          Legally deny service to same-sex couples –Christian Sharia in the U.S.
          Access to abortion restricted — Christian Sharia in the U.S..
          Objection to government funded birth control — Christian Sharia in the U.S.
          Demands that our laws agree with God’s law — U.S. Sharia.
          No abortion allowed for rape victims — Christian Sharia in the U.S.
          Interacial marriage ban — Christian Sharia in the U.S.
          Not that long ago, businesses were required to close on Sunday — Christian Sharia in the U.S.

          1. Col C says

            I know the truth is really hard to accept, especially when the lies have become so familiar. Rape accounts for only 2% of baby murders, so the other 98% should die without due process, simply because they have no CHOICE? Christians are the ones forced to participate in gay marriage ceremonies through photography, flower arrangements, wedding cakes and catering, and as far as businesses closing on Sunday, it was never a law, it was optional, and nobody’s head was cut off for not closing on Sunday, unless I missed that story. Women aren’t killed when they dishonor their husbands, (or their fellow countrymen as in your case), like in Sharia Law, in fact I just read this morning that a sign on a Starbuck’s in Saudi Arabia said women aren’t allowed to come in and get coffee, they must have a man get it for them. Jesus Christ, on the other hand, stood up for the woman caught in adultery, and confronted all the hypocrite men who wanted her stoned, and his famous words changed the course of history when he said “Neither do I condemn you, go and sin no more”

          2. AKLady says

            If your business is open to the public you serve the public.
            If you want to limit your customers, you open a private club.
            .
            Sperm meet the scientific definition of life.
            Zygotes do not.
            You approve the killing of a life form
            and damn the removal of a parasite.

          3. Col C says

            Then you are saying that an atheist caterer has to cater a Baptist Convention if asked, correct, or he must be persecuted and/or fined by the government? And an animal rights activist has to do a photo shoot for a hunting magazine, correct, or be persecuted and/or fined by the government? Because both the caterer and the photographer are open for business, correct?

            As for the second part of your diatribe, which is barely understandable, a baby in the womb is not a parasite, it is created by the mother and the father, and is dependent on the mom and dad until the baby is old enough to fend for herself/himself, and is of the same “Species” as the mother and father. A parasite is an organism that lives and feeds on or in an organism of a “Different Species” and causes harm to its host.

          4. AKLady says

            That is not what I said.

            Why do you put words in people’s mouths?
            Doing that is no different than lying.

            Parasite: an organism that lives in or on another organism (its host) and benefits by deriving nutrients at the host’s expense. Right down to the calcium from the host’s teeth and bones.

            Let me know when a man can become pregnant and/or serve as a host to a zygote. There are scientific facts, and there are opinions.

          5. Col C says

            You need to seriously look up the definition of a parasite, a parasite is a different species than the host, are you being dumb on purpose? It has nothing to do with pregnancy, and the fact that you think babies in the womb are parasites, gives me insight into your sad little mind, not to mention the fact that it is simply not true, the baby and the mother are of the same species, end of story. The fact that my children are dependent on me until they are adults does not make them parasites.

          6. ABO says

            She makes up her “facts” as she goes along Col C. Her entire persona consists of lies, fabrication and obfuscation. Your statements on the other hand are accurate and truthful.

          7. Carol Smith says

            u r delusional.

          8. Mr Rollo says

            U R communist.

          9. richardwfaith says

            Why not just leave her alone? If she’s consistent at all in her convictions, she must ultimately come to the conclusion that she herself was a “parasite” in her mother’s womb.

          10. Col C says

            lol, that would be the ultimate conclusion, by her own logic.

          11. richardwfaith says

            I just don’t have the heart to deprive her of it!

          12. AKLady says

            Your children do not live in, or on you.
            Suggest you increase your reading comprehension.

          13. jerrycollie says

            Definition of a parasite = Democrat.

          14. AKLady says

            Definition of ignorance = Republican.
            Definition of brainwashed = Republican.
            Definition of a parasite = Republican.

          15. pineapple says

            “A parasite is an organism that lives and feeds on or in an
            organism of a “Different Species” and causes harm to its host.”

            Much like a Democrat.

          16. AKLady says

            So you agree that Republicans are not entirely human!
            Amazing!

          17. Debbie Bowman says

            No your not human

          18. AKLady says

            The word “your” is a possessive pronoun.
            It is not a contraction for “you are”.
            Are you one of those Russian trolls, or did you simply drop out of school?

          19. glorybe2 says

            A parasite can prey upon its own species and an embryo is in a parasitic relationship with its host. Sharks often take a chunk out of another shark if they can get away with it. More than one alligator has eaten the young of other alligators and even its own young when they have grown a bit. Humans have been known to capture other humans and eat their blood or use it to transfuse others of their tribe and also eaten the flesh of other humans. To this very day if you get into remote areas of Haiti you can buy a dish called “The Hand”. It is a stew like meal with a chopped up human hand as the meat. It is sort of part of a tribal justice system as when one person offends another the penalty is often a hand. It does not pay to be a debtor in rural Haiti.

          20. richardwfaith says

            You are certainly a walking encyclopedia of irrelevant atypical trivia.

          21. tompinva says

            AKLady ain’t all there……………….

          22. Debbie Bowman says

            Oh I get it she’s a parasite

          23. jerrycollie says

            You ought to sign up for biology101.

          24. AKLady says

            No species has been found in which homosexual behaviour has not been shown to exist, with the exception of species that never have sex at all, such as sea urchins and aphis. Moreover, a part of the animal kingdom is hermaphroditic, truly bisexual. For them, homosexuality is not an issue.

            “Same-sex Behavior Seen In Nearly All Animals, Review Finds”, Science Daily

            ^ “Same-sex behavior seen in nearly all animals”. Physorg.com. 2009-06-16. Retrieved 2010-11-17.

            Bagemihl, Bruce (1999). Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity. St. Martin’s Press. ISBN 978-0312253776.

            Harrold, Max (1999-02-16). “Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity”. The Advocate, reprinted in Highbeam Encyclopedia. Retrieved 2007-09-10.

            Joan Roughgarden, Evolutions rainbow: Diversity, gender and sexuality in nature and people, University of California Press, Berkeley, 2004; pp. 13–183

            Norris, K. S.; Dohl, T. P. (1980). “Behaviour of the Hawaiian spinner dolphin, Stenella longirostris”. Fishery Bulletin. 77: 821–849.

            Bagemihl, Bruce (1999). Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity. New York, New York: St. Martin’s Press. p. 164.

          25. Alvis Jenkins says

            Those last four words is the answer to eternal life, “go and sin no more”.

          26. glorybe2 says

            No Christian is ever forced to serve at any gay event. people who are in business are obligated to treat all equally but no one is required to own a business permit unless they seek to serve the entire public. No society can exist when businesses are allowed to charge who they wish to charge or serve. Oh. I can’t hire a black waitress as many of my customers will not eat here, type of reasoning perpetuates hate and causes other businesses to have the same policies whether they wish to or not. So if it bothers you to have gay buyers or Jewish buyers or black buyers please close your doors and become a laborer or something.

          27. richardwfaith says

            Your lack of empathy for business OWNers seems to be a clear enough indication that you never owned a business for any significant period of time. A prime commonality between communism and globalism is a determination to render the entire concept of OWNERship extinct.

          28. Ronnie says

            Non of us are listening please go away you don’t belong here!

          29. pineapple says

            I blocked the bitch and don’t regret it.

          30. Herculesx Blade says

            She Never Saw an AK in Her Life,Maybe a Picture of an AR-15 thought is was an AK. 100 Xanax will Help Her Sleep,She’ll be refreshed and Ready for her next stop HELL!

          31. rocky says

            I assumed that ‘AK’ was simply short for ‘Arkie-Saw’ . I doubt that she would even gaze upon a firearm in a magazine rack.
            Her reference to ‘Christian-Sharia’ is a contradiction in terms, and a bit offensive to me.

          32. glorybe2 says

            Yet it is quite accurate. For example bars are often not allowed to open until the afternoon on Sundays in order to boost church attendance. Yet only Christians have Sunday as a holy day. In our fairly recent history some towns had laws against eating ice cream on Sundays as they expected people to be in worship or religious contemplation or training until Monday.

          33. James Edmond says

            Liberalism is a cult of satan and has no place in America.

          34. AKLady says

            Do you claim that America is a Christian nation? — Christian Sharia in the U.S.

            Not that long ago, businesses were required to close on Sunday — Christian Sharia in the U.S.

            Demands that same-sex marriage be illegal — Christian Sharia in the U.S.

            Legally deny service to same-sex couples –Christian Sharia in the U.S.

            Access to abortion restricted — Christian Sharia in the U.S..

            Objection to government funded birth control — Christian Sharia in the U.S.

            Demands that our laws agree with God’s law — U.S. Sharia.

            No abortion allowed for rape victims — Christian Sharia in the U.S.

            Interracial marriage ban — Christian Sharia in the U.S.

          35. Debbie Bowman says

            Lies

          36. AKLady says

            Really?
            Exactly, which of those facts do you consider a lie?
            Are you a Russian troll or a school dropout?
            Your knowledge of American history is seriously lacking.

          37. AKLady says

            The Conservative Crusade For Christian Sharia Law

            It’s not just the fringe anymore. Mainstream conservatives are trying to bring America’s laws into agreement with ‘God’s law.’

            The question isn’t: W